Paper · 2016 · Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of Salinity on Photosynthesis and Leaf Carbohydrate Content in Two Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Cultivars

Alireza Dadkhah; Ghorbanali Rassam

12
claims
26
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Plant growth is the result of many integrated and regulated physiological processes. Salinity, which is one of the major abiotic stresses, causes alterations in a wide range of physiological, biochemical and molecular processes in plants. Therefore, a factorial pot experiment was conducted based on randomized complete blocks design in green house condition to investigate the effect of salt stress on photosynthesis, leaf carbohydrate concentration and daytime leaf carbon budget of two wheat cultivars (CR and Ghods) over photoperiod. Plants were exposed to 0, 50, 150 and 250 mM salinity (NaCl and CaCl2 in 5:1 molar ratio) for 60 days. Measurements were done on fully youngest expanded leaves. Salinity caused a significant reduction in leaf net photosynthesis consequently total carbon fixed in both cultivars. Plants grown at low (50 mM) and high (250 mM) levels of salinity had net photosynthesis rates of 78.9 and 20.6% respectively compared to the control. However, salt stress significantly increased soluble carbohydrate concentration in both cultivars from 50 mM in the control to 150 mM at highest salt treatment. Starch concentration of leaves also increased with increasing salinity. As salinity had inverse effect on photosynthesis process, the total carbon fixed decreased with increasing salinity. At control condition the total carbon fixed by leaves of cultivars CR and Ghods were 255.2 and 225.3 mmol C m-2 leaf respectively, while at high level salt concentration (250 mM) only 95.4 (CR) and 63.1 (Ghods) mmol C m-2 fixed. Daytime amount of carbon translocated from leaf was reduced by salinity. However, CR exported greater amount of carbon from leaf than Ghods.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly reduced wheat leaf net photosynthesis and total fixed carbon.

Treatment
Salinitye0
Outcome
leaf net photosynthesis consequently total carbon fixede0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity caused a significant reduction in leaf net photosynthesis consequently total carbon fixed in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–815 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 50 mM salinity, photosynthesis was 78.9% of control.

Treatment
50 mMe0
Outcome
net photosynthesis ratese0
Value
78.9e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low (50 mM) and high (250 mM) levels of salinity had net photosynthesis rates of 78.9 and 20.6% respectively compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–965 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 250 mM salinity, photosynthesis was 20.6% of control.

Treatment
250 mMe0
Outcome
net photosynthesis ratese0
Value
20.6%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high (250 mM) levels of salinity had net photosynthesis rates of 78.9 and 20.6% respectively compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–965 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress significantly increased soluble leaf carbohydrate concentration in both cultivars.

Treatment
salt stresse0
Outcome
soluble carbohydrate concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
150 mMe0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salt stress significantly increased soluble carbohydrate concentration in both cultivars from 50 mM in the control to 150 mM at highest salt treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf starch concentration rose with salinity.

Treatment
increasing salinitye0
Outcome
Starch concentration of leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Starch concentration of leaves also increased with increasing salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1198 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–102 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total fixed carbon fell as salinity increased.

Treatment
increasing salinitye0
Outcome
total carbon fixede0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total carbon fixed decreased with increasing salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At control conditions, CR fixed 255.2 mmol C m-2 leaf.

Material
CRe0
Outcome
total carbon fixed by leavese0
Value
255.2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At control condition the total carbon fixed by leaves of cultivars CR and Ghods were 255.2 and 225.3 mmol C m-2 leaf respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At control conditions, Ghods fixed 225.3 mmol C m-2 leaf.

Material
Ghodse0
Outcome
total carbon fixed by leavese0
Value
225.3 mmol C m-2 leafe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At control condition the total carbon fixed by leaves of cultivars CR and Ghods were 255.2 and 225.3 mmol C m-2 leaf respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 250 mM salt, CR fixed 95.4 mmol C m-2.

Material
CRe0
Treatment
250 mMe0
Outcome
total carbon fixede1
Direction
onlye0
Value
95.4e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at high level salt concentration (250 mM) only 95.4 (CR) and 63.1 (Ghods) mmol C m-2 fixed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1544 · show in text ↑
e1

“total carbon fixed by leaves of cultivars CR and Ghods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1396 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 250 mM salt, Ghods fixed 63.1 mmol C m-2.

Material
Ghodse0
Treatment
250 mMe0
Outcome
total carbon fixede1
Direction
onlye0
Value
63.1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at high level salt concentration (250 mM) only 95.4 (CR) and 63.1 (Ghods) mmol C m-2 fixed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1544 · show in text ↑
e1

“total carbon fixed by leaves of cultivars CR and Ghods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1396 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced daytime leaf carbon export.

Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
carbon translocated from leafe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Daytime amount of carbon translocated from leaf was reduced by salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1546–1617 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CR exported more leaf carbon than Ghods.

Material
CRe0
Outcome
amount of carbon from leafe0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
Ghodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CR exported greater amount of carbon from leaf than Ghods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1628–1685 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–102 · show in text ↑

salinity · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 3 positive, 13 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

salinity · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

87 papers: 19 positive, 68 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

83 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

salinity · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

100 papers: 11 positive, 89 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.