Abstract
Potassium is an essential mineral nutrient for fruit growth and quality. Foliar sprays start to be used by fruit growers in addition to soil application. This study was undertaken in order to evaluate the effects of potassium foliar applications as the only way of fertilization on growth, fruit quality and mineral status of Royal Glory mid season peach cultivar. Potassium as potassium sulfate was applied via foliar sprays at (50 and 100%) of the tree requirements. The foliar sprays were split according to the various critical stages of the fruits growth. Another treatment using fertigation as potassium fertilization method was also observed. In this treatment, 100% of the potassium tree requirement was given. The results showed that foliar sprays did not have a significant effect on vegetative growth. The two foliar sprays at 50 and 100% showed an increase of fruit weight. Fruit quality was improved for the 100% foliar spray with a higher soluble solid content and lower fruit acidity. No significant effect was observed on the foliar mineral content for the different mineral elements between the three treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium foliar sprays had no significant effect on vegetative growth of Royal Glory peach.
- Taxon
- PEACH TREES
Prunus persicat0 - Material
- ROYAL GLORYt0
- Treatment
- foliar sprayse0
- Outcome
- vegetative growthe0
- Direction
- did not have a significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“ROYAL GLORY PEACH TREES”
e0“foliar sprays did not have a significant effect on vegetative growth”
Claim · model-written summary
The 50% and 100% potassium foliar sprays increased fruit weight.
- Taxon
- PEACH TREES
Prunus persicat0 - Material
- ROYAL GLORYt0
- Treatment
- foliar sprays at 50 and 100%e0
- Outcome
- fruit weighte0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“ROYAL GLORY PEACH TREES”
e0“The two foliar sprays at 50 and 100% showed an increase of fruit weight”
Claim · model-written summary
The 100% foliar spray gave a higher soluble solid content in fruit.
- Taxon
- PEACH TREES
Prunus persicat0 - Material
- ROYAL GLORYt0
- Treatment
- 100% foliar spraye0
- Outcome
- soluble solid contente0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“ROYAL GLORY PEACH TREES”
e0“100% foliar spray with a higher soluble solid content”
Claim · model-written summary
The 100% foliar spray gave lower fruit acidity.
- Taxon
- PEACH TREES
Prunus persicat0 - Material
- ROYAL GLORYt0
- Treatment
- 100% foliar spraye0
- Outcome
- fruit aciditye0
- Direction
- lowere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“ROYAL GLORY PEACH TREES”
e0“100% foliar spray with a higher soluble solid content and lower fruit acidity”
Claim · model-written summary
No significant effect on foliar mineral content was observed between the three treatments.
- Taxon
- PEACH TREES
Prunus persicat0 - Material
- ROYAL GLORYt0
- Treatment
- three treatmentse0
- Outcome
- foliar mineral contente0
- Direction
- No significant effect was observede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“ROYAL GLORY PEACH TREES”
e0“No significant effect was observed on the foliar mineral content for the different mineral elements between the three treatments”
The same questions in other papers
application · molecular: metabolites · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →application · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →application · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
31 papers more in this group
See all 35 papers →application · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.