Paper · 2010 · Acta Horticulturae

EFFECTS OF POTASSIUM FOLIAR SPRAYS ON ROYAL GLORY PEACH TREES

M. Ghanem; M. Ben Mimoun

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Potassium is an essential mineral nutrient for fruit growth and quality. Foliar sprays start to be used by fruit growers in addition to soil application. This study was undertaken in order to evaluate the effects of potassium foliar applications as the only way of fertilization on growth, fruit quality and mineral status of Royal Glory mid season peach cultivar. Potassium as potassium sulfate was applied via foliar sprays at (50 and 100%) of the tree requirements. The foliar sprays were split according to the various critical stages of the fruits growth. Another treatment using fertigation as potassium fertilization method was also observed. In this treatment, 100% of the potassium tree requirement was given. The results showed that foliar sprays did not have a significant effect on vegetative growth. The two foliar sprays at 50 and 100% showed an increase of fruit weight. Fruit quality was improved for the 100% foliar spray with a higher soluble solid content and lower fruit acidity. No significant effect was observed on the foliar mineral content for the different mineral elements between the three treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium foliar sprays had no significant effect on vegetative growth of Royal Glory peach.

Taxon
PEACH TREESPrunus persicat0
Material
ROYAL GLORYt0
Treatment
foliar sprayse0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
did not have a significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ROYAL GLORY PEACH TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“foliar sprays did not have a significant effect on vegetative growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–811 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% and 100% potassium foliar sprays increased fruit weight.

Taxon
PEACH TREESPrunus persicat0
Material
ROYAL GLORYt0
Treatment
foliar sprays at 50 and 100%e0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ROYAL GLORY PEACH TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“The two foliar sprays at 50 and 100% showed an increase of fruit weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–884 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% foliar spray gave a higher soluble solid content in fruit.

Taxon
PEACH TREESPrunus persicat0
Material
ROYAL GLORYt0
Treatment
100% foliar spraye0
Outcome
soluble solid contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ROYAL GLORY PEACH TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“100% foliar spray with a higher soluble solid content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–974 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% foliar spray gave lower fruit acidity.

Taxon
PEACH TREESPrunus persicat0
Material
ROYAL GLORYt0
Treatment
100% foliar spraye0
Outcome
fruit aciditye0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ROYAL GLORY PEACH TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“100% foliar spray with a higher soluble solid content and lower fruit acidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–998 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant effect on foliar mineral content was observed between the three treatments.

Taxon
PEACH TREESPrunus persicat0
Material
ROYAL GLORYt0
Treatment
three treatmentse0
Outcome
foliar mineral contente0
Direction
No significant effect was observede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ROYAL GLORY PEACH TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“No significant effect was observed on the foliar mineral content for the different mineral elements between the three treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1128 · show in text ↑

application · molecular: metabolites · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 18 positive, 2 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

application · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 26 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

application · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 31 positive, 8 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.