Paper · 2009 · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)

Evaluation of silages elaborated with corn produced under two fertilization levels: II. Quality.

Hero Alfaya; Letícia Andriani dos Santos; A. A. A. Raupp; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

To minimize produc on costs small farmers at the Pelotas dairy basin use as maximum fer liza on level for silage produc on, the one recommended for grain produc on. Therefore, this study evaluated the effect of two levels of fer liza on (for grains; for silage) upon quality, level and adequacy of nutrients for three groups of animals (lacta ng, growing and nishing catle) in silages of two corn cul vars (variety corn; hybrid corn). Quality parameters (dry mater, crude ash, organic mater, crude protein, ether extract, crude ber, non nitrogen extract, neutral detergent ber, acid detergent ber, and in vitro organic mater diges bility), as well as available nutrients (diges ble crude protein, total diges ble nutrients, metabolizable energy, net energy lacta on, net energy maintenance, net energy gain, calcium and phosphorus) per kilogram of dry mater were es mated. Milk produc on capacity, per ton and per hectare, was es mated. The experimental design was the randomized complete blocks, with four replicates. Nutrient levels of silages of both cul vars and at both levels of fer liza on are characteris c of those found for corn silages. Fer liza on for silage produc on increases the levels of crude ash, crude protein and diges ble crude protein as well as in vitro organic mater diges bility coe cient. Silages of both cul vars su ce as far as energy for milk and beef is concerned; however, silages of both cul vars are very de cient in protein, calcium and phosphorus at both levels of fer liza on. Fer liza on level for silage produc on shows greater poten al for milk produc on per ton and per hectare, for both cul vars. Fer liza on level for silage produc on and protein and minerals for animal supplementa on is advisable.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silage nutrient levels were characteristic of corn silage across cultivars and fertilization levels.

Outcome
Nutrient levels of silagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nutrient levels of silages of both cul vars and at both levels of fer liza on are characteris c of those found for corn silages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1146 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silage fertilization increased crude ash, crude protein and digestible crude protein.

Treatment
Fer liza on for silage produc one0
Outcome
crude ash, crude protein and diges ble crude proteine0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fer liza on for silage produc on increases the levels of crude ash, crude protein and diges ble crude protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1257 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silage fertilization increased in vitro organic matter digestibility.

Treatment
Fer liza on for silage produc one0
Outcome
in vitro organic mater diges bility coe ciente0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fer liza on for silage produc on increases the levels of crude ash, crude protein and diges ble crude protein as well as in vitro organic mater diges bility coe cient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1314 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both cultivars supplied sufficient energy for milk and beef.

Outcome
energy for milk and beefe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Silages of both cul vars su ce as far as energy for milk and beef is concerned”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1394 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silages of both cultivars were deficient in protein, calcium and phosphorus at both fertilization levels.

Outcome
protein, calcium and phosphoruse0
Qualifier
at both levels of fer liza one0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“silages of both cul vars are very de cient in protein, calcium and phosphorus at both levels of fer liza on”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1512 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silage fertilization increased milk production potential per ton and per hectare.

Treatment
Fer liza on level for silage produc one0
Outcome
poten al for milk produc on per ton and per hectaree0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fer liza on level for silage produc on shows greater poten al for milk produc on per ton and per hectare, for both cul vars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1637 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–42 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended silage fertilization and protein and mineral supplementation.

Outcome
Fer liza on level for silage produc on and protein and minerals for animal supplementa one0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fer liza on level for silage produc on and protein and minerals for animal supplementa on is advisable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1639–1741 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–42 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 12 positive, 4 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.