Paper · 2016 · Journal of Functional And Environmental Botany

Microbial Colonization of Tomato Phylloplane is Influenced by Leaf Age

Beenish Saleem; P.K. Paul

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Nutrient status on the leaf alters as it matures, which often restructures the microbial population. To understand the effect of age on phylloplane colonization, two varieties of tomato (Pusa early dwarf and F1-Priya-6636) were sampled. Various stages of leaf development and microbial colonization was studied by leaf imprint culture method. The bacterial species were identified by 16S rRNA sequencing, and fungal species by microscopic methods. The dominant bacterial species were Pseudomonas koreensis, P. stutzeri, P. jesseni, Sphingobacterium daejonense, Klebsiella pneumoneae, Serratia fonticola and fungal species were Alternaria alternata, A. citrifolia, Aspergillus niger, A. flavus, A. candidus, A. nidulans, Penicillium expansum, Curvlaria lunata, Cladosporium cladosporioides, C. herbarum, Fusarium oxysporum, Trichoderma harzianum and Rhizoctonia solani. Leaf surfaces were investigated by assessment of microbial colonization patterns. Adaxial surface was found to be densely populated with age.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial colonization of the adaxial tomato leaf surface became denser with leaf age.

Organ / stage
Adaxial surfacee2
Outcome
microbial colonizatione1
Direction
increaseinferrede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two varieties of tomato (Pusa early dwarf and F1-Priya-6636) were sampled”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–235 · show in text ↑
e1

“Various stages of leaf development and microbial colonization was studied by leaf imprint culture method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–341 · show in text ↑
e2

“Adaxial surface was found to be densely populated with age”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1009 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas koreensis and P. stutzeri were among the dominant bacterial species on tomato phylloplanes.

Interactor
Pseudomonas koreensisPseudomonas koreensise3other
Second interactor
P. stutzerie3other
Outcome
dominant bacterial speciese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two varieties of tomato (Pusa early dwarf and F1-Priya-6636) were sampled”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–235 · show in text ↑
e3

“The dominant bacterial species were Pseudomonas koreensis, P. stutzeri, P. jesseni, Sphingobacterium daejonense, Klebsiella pneumoneae, Serratia fonticola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–602 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. jesseni and Sphingobacterium daejonense were among the dominant bacterial species on tomato phylloplanes.

Interactor
P. jessenie3other
Second interactor
Sphingobacterium daejonensee3other
Outcome
dominant bacterial speciese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two varieties of tomato (Pusa early dwarf and F1-Priya-6636) were sampled”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–235 · show in text ↑
e3

“The dominant bacterial species were Pseudomonas koreensis, P. stutzeri, P. jesseni, Sphingobacterium daejonense, Klebsiella pneumoneae, Serratia fonticola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–602 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Klebsiella pneumoneae and Serratia fonticola were among the dominant bacterial species on tomato phylloplanes.

Interactor
Klebsiella pneumoneaee3other
Second interactor
Serratia fonticolaSerratia fonticolae3other
Outcome
dominant bacterial speciese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Serratia fonticola
Serratia fonticola · Second interactorGiuseppe Lorenzo · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two varieties of tomato (Pusa early dwarf and F1-Priya-6636) were sampled”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–235 · show in text ↑
e3

“The dominant bacterial species were Pseudomonas koreensis, P. stutzeri, P. jesseni, Sphingobacterium daejonense, Klebsiella pneumoneae, Serratia fonticola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–602 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternaria alternata and A. citrifolia were among the fungal species on tomato phylloplanes.

Interactor
Alternaria alternataAlternaria alternatae4other
Second interactor
A. citrifoliae4other
Outcome
fungal speciese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMarta Hiromi Taniwaki, Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two varieties of tomato (Pusa early dwarf and F1-Priya-6636) were sampled”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–235 · show in text ↑
e4

“fungal species were Alternaria alternata, A. citrifolia, Aspergillus niger, A. flavus, A. candidus, A. nidulans, Penicillium expansum, Curvlaria lunata, Cladosporium cladosporioides, C. herbarum, Fusarium oxysporum, Trichoderma harzianum and Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–867 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aspergillus niger and A. flavus were among the fungal species on tomato phylloplanes.

Interactor
Aspergillus nigerAspergillus nigere4other
Second interactor
A. flavusAspergillus flavuse4other
Outcome
fungal speciese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus niger
Aspergillus niger · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Y tambe assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · Second interactorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two varieties of tomato (Pusa early dwarf and F1-Priya-6636) were sampled”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–235 · show in text ↑
e4

“fungal species were Alternaria alternata, A. citrifolia, Aspergillus niger, A. flavus, A. candidus, A. nidulans, Penicillium expansum, Curvlaria lunata, Cladosporium cladosporioides, C. herbarum, Fusarium oxysporum, Trichoderma harzianum and Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–867 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. candidus and A. nidulans were among the fungal species on tomato phylloplanes.

Interactor
A. candidusAspergillus candiduse4other
Second interactor
A. nidulansAspergillus nidulanse4other
Outcome
fungal speciese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus candidus
Aspergillus candidus · InteractorMedmyco · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus nidulans
Aspergillus nidulans · Second interactorPlasmidmap · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two varieties of tomato (Pusa early dwarf and F1-Priya-6636) were sampled”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–235 · show in text ↑
e4

“fungal species were Alternaria alternata, A. citrifolia, Aspergillus niger, A. flavus, A. candidus, A. nidulans, Penicillium expansum, Curvlaria lunata, Cladosporium cladosporioides, C. herbarum, Fusarium oxysporum, Trichoderma harzianum and Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–867 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penicillium expansum and Curvlaria lunata were among the fungal species on tomato phylloplanes.

Interactor
Penicillium expansumPenicillium expansume4other
Second interactor
Curvlaria lunatae4other
Outcome
fungal speciese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium expansum
Penicillium expansum · InteractorH.J. Larsen, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two varieties of tomato (Pusa early dwarf and F1-Priya-6636) were sampled”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–235 · show in text ↑
e4

“fungal species were Alternaria alternata, A. citrifolia, Aspergillus niger, A. flavus, A. candidus, A. nidulans, Penicillium expansum, Curvlaria lunata, Cladosporium cladosporioides, C. herbarum, Fusarium oxysporum, Trichoderma harzianum and Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–867 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cladosporium cladosporioides and C. herbarum were among the fungal species on tomato phylloplanes.

Interactor
Cladosporium cladosporioidesCladosporium cladosporioidese4other
Second interactor
C. herbarumCladosporium herbarume4other
Outcome
fungal speciese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cladosporium cladosporioides
Cladosporium cladosporioides · InteractorMedmyco · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two varieties of tomato (Pusa early dwarf and F1-Priya-6636) were sampled”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–235 · show in text ↑
e4

“fungal species were Alternaria alternata, A. citrifolia, Aspergillus niger, A. flavus, A. candidus, A. nidulans, Penicillium expansum, Curvlaria lunata, Cladosporium cladosporioides, C. herbarum, Fusarium oxysporum, Trichoderma harzianum and Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–867 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium oxysporum and Trichoderma harzianum were among the fungal species on tomato phylloplanes.

Interactor
Fusarium oxysporumFusarium oxysporume4other
Second interactor
Trichoderma harzianumTrichoderma harzianume4other
Outcome
fungal speciese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two varieties of tomato (Pusa early dwarf and F1-Priya-6636) were sampled”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–235 · show in text ↑
e4

“fungal species were Alternaria alternata, A. citrifolia, Aspergillus niger, A. flavus, A. candidus, A. nidulans, Penicillium expansum, Curvlaria lunata, Cladosporium cladosporioides, C. herbarum, Fusarium oxysporum, Trichoderma harzianum and Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–867 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizoctonia solani was among the fungal species on tomato phylloplanes.

Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie4other
Outcome
fungal speciese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two varieties of tomato (Pusa early dwarf and F1-Priya-6636) were sampled”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–235 · show in text ↑
e4

“fungal species were Alternaria alternata, A. citrifolia, Aspergillus niger, A. flavus, A. candidus, A. nidulans, Penicillium expansum, Curvlaria lunata, Cladosporium cladosporioides, C. herbarum, Fusarium oxysporum, Trichoderma harzianum and Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–867 · show in text ↑