Paper · 2005 · Acta Horticulturae

POSTHARVEST APPLICATION OF THE YEAST CRYPTOCOCCUS LAURENTII REDUCES APPLE ROTS

L.E.B. Blum; C.V.T. Amarante; R.M. Valdebenito-Sanhueza

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Rots might be responsible for substantial post-harvest losses on apples (Malus domestica). The blue mold caused by Penicillium expansum, the bitter rot caused by Glomerella cingulata and the ?bull?s-eye rot? induced by Pezicula malicorticis are among the most common rots. Great attention has been given to less environmental damaging alternatives for the control of post-harvest diseases. The post-harvest application of yeasts, such as Cryptococcus laurentii, is one of the options to control fruit rots. This study was carried out to test the efficiency of C. laurentii on fruit rots control in ?Fuji? and ?Gala? apples. After application of treatments by immersion, the fruits were stored in laboratory (15-20°C and 60-70% RH) or in cold storage (1°C and 90-95% RH). The pathogens were applied at the concentration of 102 conidia mL-1, the yeast at 107 cells mL-1 and the fungicides at 150 mg l-1. An isolate (36) of C. laurentii was as efficient as the fungicides (thiabendazole and iprodione) to reduce apple fruit rots (G. cingulata, P. expansum, and P. malicorticis). In cold storage trials, C. laurentii was as efficient as the fungicides (thiabendazole, iprodione, chlorhexidine digluconate, sodium dichloro-s-triazinetrione, sodium dicloroisocyanurate and sodium hypochlorite) to reduce P. expansum fruit rot. The application of C. laurentii did not affect flesh firmness and total soluble solids content of the fruits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An isolate of Cryptococcus laurentii applied postharvest reduced apple fruit rots as well as the fungicides thiabendazole and iprodione.

Treatment
An isolate (36) of C. laurentiie1
Interactor
P. expansumPenicillium expansume1pathogen
Second interactor
C. laurentiiPapiliotrema laurentiie1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
apple fruit rotse1
Direction
reducee1
Qualifier
G. cingulata, P. expansum, and P. malicorticise1
Comparator
fungicides (thiabendazole and iprodione)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium expansum
Penicillium expansum · InteractorH.J. Larsen, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“POSTHARVEST APPLICATION OF THE YEAST CRYPTOCOCCUS LAURENTII REDUCES APPLE ROTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“An isolate (36) of C. laurentii was as efficient as the fungicides (thiabendazole and iprodione) to reduce apple fruit rots (G. cingulata, P. expansum, and P. malicorticis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1074 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In cold storage, Cryptococcus laurentii reduced Penicillium expansum fruit rot as well as the listed fungicides did.

Treatment
C. laurentiie2
Interactor
P. expansumPenicillium expansume2pathogen
Second interactor
C. laurentiiPapiliotrema laurentiie2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
P. expansum fruit rote2
Direction
reducee2
Comparator
fungicides (thiabendazole, iprodione, chlorhexidine digluconate, sodium dichloro-s-triazinetrione, sodium dicloroisocyanurate and sodium hypochlorite)e2
Setting
cold storagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium expansum
Penicillium expansum · InteractorH.J. Larsen, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“POSTHARVEST APPLICATION OF THE YEAST CRYPTOCOCCUS LAURENTII REDUCES APPLE ROTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 · show in text ↑
e2

“In cold storage trials, C. laurentii was as efficient as the fungicides (thiabendazole, iprodione, chlorhexidine digluconate, sodium dichloro-s-triazinetrione, sodium dicloroisocyanurate and sodium hypochlorite) to reduce P. expansum fruit rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1319 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of Cryptococcus laurentii did not affect flesh firmness or total soluble solids content of apple fruit.

Treatment
application of C. laurentiie3
Interactor
C. laurentiiPapiliotrema laurentiie3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
flesh firmness and total soluble solids contente3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“POSTHARVEST APPLICATION OF THE YEAST CRYPTOCOCCUS LAURENTII REDUCES APPLE ROTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78 · show in text ↑
e3

“The application of C. laurentii did not affect flesh firmness and total soluble solids content of the fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1429 · show in text ↑

Papiliotrema laurentii · Penicillium expansum · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.