Paper · 2010 · Acta Horticulturae

MANAGEMENT OF NITROGEN AND POTASSIUM FERTILIZER INPUTS ON FERTIGATED PEAR ORCHARDS AND ITS INFLUENCE ON YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY

L. Duarte; P.V. Jordão; F. Calouro; et al.

4
claims
12
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to optimize the management of nitrogen and potassium fertilizer inputs with fertigation in soils under pear tree orchard cultivation, two field experiments were carried out in the Portuguese Region of Oeste over seven years. The experiments were conducted in two fertigated orchards of the Portuguese cultivar Rocha grafted on EMA, with different ages (P1 was planted in 1991, and P2 in 1998). The experiments were randomized complete block designs with three replications. Seven experimental treatments were imposed, consisting of different partitions of the same levels of nitrogen and potassium fertilization (on average 43 kg ha -1 , N and 80 kg ha -1 , K20 at P1, and 44 kg ha -1 , N and 71 kg ha -1 , K 2 O at P2) over the growing season, plus a control, without fertilization. No significant differences (P=0.05) were found among the experimental treatments on the yield and quality parameters in the younger orchard. In contrast, in P1 the application of nitrogen in at three different times -1/3 at bud stage + 1/3 after fruit set + 1/3 before fruits reached 14 mm of equatorial diameter, plus the application of potassium every week, from bud stage to one week before harvest - lead to the highest mean annual yield (around 33 kg per tree), although without significant differences (P=0.05) from the experimental treatment consisting of the application of nitrogen every week and the application of potassium three times a year. The quality parameters of the produced fruits (firmness of the pulp, total soluble solids, and titratable acidity), in both trials, were within the adequate range values for the cultivar, although they were affected by the experimental treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the younger orchard, nitrogen and potassium fertigation partitions did not differ significantly in yield or quality parameters.

Treatment
different partitions of the same levels of nitrogen and potassium fertilizatione1
Outcome
yield and quality parameterse2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Qualifier
in the younger orcharde2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FERTIGATED PEAR ORCHARDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–82 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seven experimental treatments were imposed, consisting of different partitions of the same levels of nitrogen and potassium fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–620 · show in text ↑
e2

“No significant differences (P=0.05) were found among the experimental treatments on the yield and quality parameters in the younger orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–932 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In P1, nitrogen applied at three times with weekly potassium gave the highest mean annual yield, around 33 kg per tree, without significant difference from weekly nitrogen with potassium three times a year.

Treatment
in P1 the application of nitrogen in at three different timese3
Outcome
mean annual yielde4
Direction
higheste4
Value
around 33 kg per treee4
Comparator
the application of nitrogen every week and the application of potassium three times a yeare5
Setting
P1e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FERTIGATED PEAR ORCHARDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–82 · show in text ↑
e3

“in P1 the application of nitrogen in at three different times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1008 · show in text ↑
e4

“lead to the highest mean annual yield (around 33 kg per tree)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1258 · show in text ↑
e5

“although without significant differences (P=0.05) from the experimental treatment consisting of the application of nitrogen every week and the application of potassium three times a year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1446 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and potassium fertigation treatments affected the firmness, total soluble solids and titratable acidity of pear fruit.

Treatment
experimental treatmentse7
Outcome
firmness of the pulp, total soluble solids, and titratable aciditye6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FERTIGATED PEAR ORCHARDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–82 · show in text ↑
e6

“The quality parameters of the produced fruits (firmness of the pulp, total soluble solids, and titratable acidity), in both trials, were within the adequate range values for the cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1634 · show in text ↑
e7

“although they were affected by the experimental treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1636–1694 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Firmness, total soluble solids and titratable acidity of pear fruit were within the adequate range values for the cultivar.

Outcome
firmness of the pulp, total soluble solids, and titratable aciditye6
Qualifier
within the adequate range values for the cultivare6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FERTIGATED PEAR ORCHARDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–82 · show in text ↑
e6

“The quality parameters of the produced fruits (firmness of the pulp, total soluble solids, and titratable acidity), in both trials, were within the adequate range values for the cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1634 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: general · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.