Paper · 2012 · Guoshu xuebao

Effects of manure types on sugars and acids content and flavor of pear(Pyrus pyrifolia cv.Hwangkumbae)

Wei QinPing

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this study,field experiment was carried out to investigate firmness and soluble solid concentration(SSC),and different types of sugar and acid in Hwangkumbae pear after various types of manure application.In the first and second years,fruit SSC of treatments compost manure + amino acid foliage fertilizer and mature animal waste compost was significantly higher than CK.Total sugar and fructose content of all the treatments were increased significantly in the first year,however,in the second,only in the two treatments(compost manure + amino acid foliage fertilizer and mature animal waste compost),total sugar,fructose and glucose content of the two treatments of were enhanced.Moreover,content of total acid,tartaric acid,malic acid,citric acid and succinic acid was decreased and fruit flavor was improved after various types of manure application.It could be concluded that field grown Hwangkumbae pear applying compost manure + amino acid foliage fertilizer or mature animal waste compost could increase sugar content,decrease organic acids,enhance flavor and improve quality.Its effects could be continued more than two years after one application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

compost manure + amino acid foliage fertilizer increased pear fruit SSC in both years.

Material
Hwangkumbaet0
Treatment
compost manure + amino acid foliage fertilizere0
Outcome
fruit SSCe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
first and second yearse0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the first and second years,fruit SSC of treatments compost manure + amino acid foliage fertilizer and mature animal waste compost was significantly higher than CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–373 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear(Pyrus pyrifolia cv.Hwangkumbae)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

mature animal waste compost increased pear fruit SSC in both years.

Material
Hwangkumbaet0
Treatment
mature animal waste composte0
Outcome
fruit SSCe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
first and second yearse0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the first and second years,fruit SSC of treatments compost manure + amino acid foliage fertilizer and mature animal waste compost was significantly higher than CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–373 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear(Pyrus pyrifolia cv.Hwangkumbae)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All manure treatments increased pear total sugar and fructose in the first year.

Treatment
all the treatmentse0
Outcome
Total sugar and fructose contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
first yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total sugar and fructose content of all the treatments were increased significantly in the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–475 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear(Pyrus pyrifolia cv.Hwangkumbae)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

compost manure + amino acid foliage fertilizer enhanced pear sugars in year two.

Treatment
compost manure + amino acid foliage fertilizere0
Outcome
total sugar,fructose and glucose contente0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
seconde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the second,only in the two treatments(compost manure + amino acid foliage fertilizer and mature animal waste compost),total sugar,fructose and glucose content of the two treatments of were enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–684 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear(Pyrus pyrifolia cv.Hwangkumbae)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

mature animal waste compost enhanced pear sugars in year two.

Treatment
mature animal waste composte0
Outcome
total sugar,fructose and glucose contente0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
seconde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the second,only in the two treatments(compost manure + amino acid foliage fertilizer and mature animal waste compost),total sugar,fructose and glucose content of the two treatments of were enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–684 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear(Pyrus pyrifolia cv.Hwangkumbae)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure decreased pear total acid,tartaric acid,malic acid.

Treatment
various types of manure applicatione0
Outcome
total acid,tartaric acid,malic acide0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“content of total acid,tartaric acid,malic acid,citric acid and succinic acid was decreased and fruit flavor was improved after various types of manure application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear(Pyrus pyrifolia cv.Hwangkumbae)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure decreased pear citric acid and succinic acid.

Treatment
various types of manure applicatione0
Outcome
citric acid and succinic acide0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“content of total acid,tartaric acid,malic acid,citric acid and succinic acid was decreased and fruit flavor was improved after various types of manure application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear(Pyrus pyrifolia cv.Hwangkumbae)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure improved pear fruit flavor.

Treatment
various types of manure applicatione0
Outcome
fruit flavore0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“content of total acid,tartaric acid,malic acid,citric acid and succinic acid was decreased and fruit flavor was improved after various types of manure application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear(Pyrus pyrifolia cv.Hwangkumbae)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–102 · show in text ↑

amino acid · molecular: metabolites · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

amino acid · quality: sugar starch · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 13 positive, 5 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.