Abstract
The choice of fertilization method was very important for improving fertilizer utilization and reducing the loss of fertilizer in pear production applications. The experiment material was 'Aiganshui' pear tree. In this experiment, the pear cultivar 'Aigan Water' was used as a test material. Three treatments were set up in the trial, such as the application of ordinary compound fertilizers, ordinary slow-release fertilizers and bag-controlled slow release fertilizers. Each process sets 4 repetitions. The results show that there was no significant effect of bag-controlled slow-release fertilizer on the morphological index of fruit quality. However, slow-release fertilizers in intrinsic quality increase the Vc content of fruits compared to ordinary compound fertilizers. And slow-release fertilizers increase the soluble solids content and the nutritional value of the fruit. The ratio of sugar to acid in the bag-controlled slow-release fertilizer was significantly increased, the flavor of the fruit was improved, the taste was better, and the cost of fertilizer for the 'Aiganshui' pear tree was decreased.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Bag-controlled slow-release fertilizer had no significant effect on morphological fruit quality.
- Taxon
- Pear Tree
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=60)
Pyrus communist0 - Material
- ‘Aiganshui’t0
- Treatment
- bag-controlled slow-release fertilizere0
- Outcome
- morphological index of fruit qualitye0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“‘Aiganshui’ Pear Tree”
e0“there was no significant effect of bag-controlled slow-release fertilizer on the morphological index of fruit quality.”
Claim · model-written summary
Slow-release fertilizers increased fruit Vc content compared with ordinary compound fertilizers.
- Taxon
- Pear TreePyrus communist0
- Material
- ‘Aiganshui’t0
- Treatment
- slow-release fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- Vc content of fruitse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- ordinary compound fertilizerse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“‘Aiganshui’ Pear Tree”
e0“slow-release fertilizers in intrinsic quality increase the Vc content of fruits compared to ordinary compound fertilizers.”
Claim · model-written summary
Slow-release fertilizers increased pear fruit soluble solids content.
- Taxon
- Pear TreePyrus communist0
- Material
- ‘Aiganshui’t0
- Treatment
- slow-release fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- soluble solids contente0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“‘Aiganshui’ Pear Tree”
e0“slow-release fertilizers increase the soluble solids content and the nutritional value of the fruit.”
Claim · model-written summary
Slow-release fertilizers increased pear fruit nutritional value.
- Taxon
- Pear TreePyrus communist0
- Material
- ‘Aiganshui’t0
- Treatment
- slow-release fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- nutritional value of the fruite0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“‘Aiganshui’ Pear Tree”
e0“slow-release fertilizers increase the soluble solids content and the nutritional value of the fruit.”
Claim · model-written summary
Bag-controlled slow-release fertilizer significantly increased the sugar-to-acid ratio.
- Taxon
- Pear TreePyrus communist0
- Material
- ‘Aiganshui’t0
- Treatment
- bag-controlled slow-release fertilizere0
- Outcome
- ratio of sugar to acide0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“‘Aiganshui’ Pear Tree”
e0“The ratio of sugar to acid in the bag-controlled slow-release fertilizer was significantly increased”
Claim · model-written summary
Bag-controlled slow-release fertilizer improved pear fruit flavor and taste.
- Taxon
- Pear TreePyrus communist0
- Material
- ‘Aiganshui’t0
- Treatment
- bag-controlled slow-release fertilizere1
- Outcome
- flavor of the fruite0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“‘Aiganshui’ Pear Tree”
e0“the flavor of the fruit was improved, the taste was better”
e1“The ratio of sugar to acid in the bag-controlled slow-release fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
Bag-controlled slow-release fertilizer decreased fertilizer cost for Aiganshui pear.
- Taxon
- pear treePyrus communise0
- Material
- 'Aiganshui'e0
- Treatment
- bag-controlled slow-release fertilizere1
- Outcome
- cost of fertilizere0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“‘Aiganshui’ Pear Tree”
e0“the cost of fertilizer for the 'Aiganshui' pear tree was decreased.”
e1“The ratio of sugar to acid in the bag-controlled slow-release fertilizer”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: general · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
fertilization · quality: grain · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →fertilization · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results
31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.