Paper · 2012

Effects of manure types on sugar and acid contents and flavor of pear(Pyrus pyrifolia ‘Hwangkumbae')at different mature stages

Wei QinPing

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

【Objective】To optimize manure application method and acquire the optimum harvest timing,【Method】the field experiment was carried out to investigate sugar and organic acid contents and flavor in 5-year-old 'Hwangkumbae' pear at different mature stages after the application of five type manures.【Result】Total sugar,fructose,glucose and sucrose contents increased significantly,and total acid,malic acid and citric acid decreased in the treatments of compost manure + amino acid fertilizer and mature animal waste compost,however,two treatments of chicken dung + peat and compost manure + bacterial manure showed no significant difference compared with CK(compost manure).Fruit total sugar,fructose,glucose and sucrose contents and flavor index increased and then decreased,however,total acid,malic acid and citric acid had the opposite changes during the sampling period(14 Sept.-10 Oct.).The highest sugar content and flavor index and the lowest total acid and organic acid contents were observed on 28 Sept.【Conclusion】The results suggested that compost manure + amino acid fertilizer and mature animal waste could increase fruit quality and flavor,and the optimum harvest timing for 'Hwangkumbae' pear is about on 28 Sept.in Beijing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost manure plus amino acid fertilizer significantly increased fruit sugars.

Treatment
compost manure + amino acid fertilizere0
Outcome
Total sugar,fructose,glucose and sucrose contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear(Pyrus pyrifolia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“Total sugar,fructose,glucose and sucrose contents increased significantly,and total acid,malic acid and citric acid decreased in the treatments of compost manure + amino acid fertilizer and mature animal waste compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mature animal waste compost significantly increased fruit sugars.

Treatment
mature animal waste composte0
Outcome
Total sugar,fructose,glucose and sucrose contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear(Pyrus pyrifolia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“Total sugar,fructose,glucose and sucrose contents increased significantly,and total acid,malic acid and citric acid decreased in the treatments of compost manure + amino acid fertilizer and mature animal waste compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost manure plus amino acid fertilizer decreased fruit acids.

Treatment
compost manure + amino acid fertilizere0
Outcome
total acid,malic acid and citric acide0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear(Pyrus pyrifolia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“total acid,malic acid and citric acid decreased in the treatments of compost manure + amino acid fertilizer and mature animal waste compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mature animal waste compost decreased fruit acids.

Treatment
mature animal waste composte0
Outcome
total acid,malic acid and citric acide0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear(Pyrus pyrifolia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“total acid,malic acid and citric acid decreased in the treatments of compost manure + amino acid fertilizer and mature animal waste compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chicken dung plus peat did not differ significantly from compost manure.

Treatment
chicken dung + peate0
Outcome
no significant differencee0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
CK(compost manure)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear(Pyrus pyrifolia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“two treatments of chicken dung + peat and compost manure + bacterial manure showed no significant difference compared with CK(compost manure)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–669 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost manure plus bacterial manure did not differ significantly from compost manure.

Treatment
compost manure + bacterial manuree0
Outcome
no significant differencee0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
CK(compost manure)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear(Pyrus pyrifolia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“two treatments of chicken dung + peat and compost manure + bacterial manure showed no significant difference compared with CK(compost manure)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–669 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit sugars and flavor index first increased and then decreased through the sampling period.

Outcome
Fruit total sugar,fructose,glucose and sucrose contents and flavor indexe0
Direction
increased and then decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear(Pyrus pyrifolia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit total sugar,fructose,glucose and sucrose contents and flavor index increased and then decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–771 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit acid contents followed the opposite temporal pattern from sugars.

Outcome
total acid,malic acid and citric acide0
Qualifier
sampling period(14 Sept.-10 Oct.)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear(Pyrus pyrifolia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“total acid,malic acid and citric acid had the opposite changes during the sampling period(14 Sept.-10 Oct.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–888 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar content and flavor index were highest on 28 September.

Outcome
sugar content and flavor indexe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
28 Sept.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear(Pyrus pyrifolia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest sugar content and flavor index and the lowest total acid and organic acid contents were observed on 28 Sept.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1008 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total acid and organic acid contents were lowest on 28 September.

Outcome
total acid and organic acid contentse0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
28 Sept.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear(Pyrus pyrifolia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest sugar content and flavor index and the lowest total acid and organic acid contents were observed on 28 Sept.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1008 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude compost manure plus amino acid fertilizer can improve fruit quality and flavor.

Treatment
compost manure + amino acid fertilizere0
Outcome
increase fruit quality and flavore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear(Pyrus pyrifolia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“compost manure + amino acid fertilizer and mature animal waste could increase fruit quality and flavor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1149 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude mature animal waste can improve fruit quality and flavor.

Treatment
mature animal wastee0
Outcome
increase fruit quality and flavore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear(Pyrus pyrifolia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“compost manure + amino acid fertilizer and mature animal waste could increase fruit quality and flavor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1149 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify about 28 September in Beijing as the optimum harvest time.

Outcome
optimum harvest timinge0
Qualifier
about on 28 Sept.e0
Setting
Beijinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear(Pyrus pyrifolia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“the optimum harvest timing for 'Hwangkumbae' pear is about on 28 Sept.in Beijing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1235 · show in text ↑

amino acid · molecular: metabolites · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

amino acid · quality: sugar starch · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 13 positive, 5 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.