Paper · 1987 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Effects of Sequential Low-oxygen and Standard Controlled Atmosphere Storage Regimens on Apple Quality

P.D. Lidster; E.C. Lougheed; K.B. McRae

15
claims
26
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Storing ‘McIntosh’ apples ( Malus domestica Borkh.) initially in 1.0% or 1.5% CO 2 plus 1.0% O 2 at 3°C (LO) was more effective in retarding firmness loss than initial storage in 4.5% or 5.0% CO 2 plus 3.0% O 2 at 3° (SCA), indicating that early exposure to LO suppressed the subsequent rate of softening in SCA. ‘McIntosh’ firmness retention, determined 1 day after storage and after 7 days at 20°, decreased with fruit maturity for all LO and SCA storage regimens, but mature fruit tended to soften more rapidly in SCA after being exposed initially to LO. Initial storage in SCA for >75 days with subsequent storage in LO (in 1984) did not result in firmer apples than those stored continuously in SCA. The initial exposure period in LO needed to induce retention of apple firmness depended on cultivar and temperature. For ‘McIntosh’, ‘Spartan’, and ‘Golden Delicious’ cultivars, respectively, maximum post-storage fruit firmness was reached after 7.5, 4.5, and 1.5 months of initial exposure to LO at 0° and after 4.5, 3.0, and 3.0 months at 3°. Poststorage evolution of CO 2 and C 2 H 4 and the severity of senescent disorders generally decreased with continuing storage in LO, but the incidence of low-O 2 injury increased. Poststorage ethanol evolution increased with exposure to 1.0% O 2 in ‘McIntosh’ apples stored at 0°, and ‘Spartan’ apples held at either 0° or 3°. Chemical name used: butanedioic acid mono(2,2-dimethylhydrazide) (daminozide).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial low-oxygen storage retarded McIntosh firmness loss more effectively than initial standard controlled atmosphere storage.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Material
‘McIntosh’e0
Treatment
1.0% or 1.5% CO 2 plus 1.0% O 2 at 3°C (LO)e0
Outcome
firmness losse0
Direction
retardinge0
Comparator
4.5% or 5.0% CO 2 plus 3.0% O 2 at 3° (SCA)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Storing ‘McIntosh’ apples ( Malus domestica Borkh.) initially in 1.0% or 1.5% CO 2 plus 1.0% O 2 at 3°C (LO) was more effective in retarding firmness loss than initial storage in 4.5% or 5.0% CO 2 plus 3.0% O 2 at 3° (SCA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–231 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early low-oxygen exposure suppressed subsequent softening in standard controlled atmosphere storage.

Treatment
early exposure to LOe0
Outcome
rate of softeninge0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“early exposure to LO suppressed the subsequent rate of softening in SCA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–320 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

McIntosh firmness retention decreased with maturity across storage regimens.

Material
‘McIntosh’e0
Organ / stage
fruit maturitye0
Outcome
firmness retentione0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
1 day after storage and after 7 days at 20°e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘McIntosh’ firmness retention, determined 1 day after storage and after 7 days at 20°, decreased with fruit maturity for all LO and SCA storage regimens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–474 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mature fruit tended to soften faster in SCA following initial LO exposure.

Organ / stage
mature fruite0
Treatment
exposed initially to LOe0
Outcome
softene0
Direction
more rapidlye0
Qualifier
tendede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mature fruit tended to soften more rapidly in SCA after being exposed initially to LO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–565 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial SCA for over 75 days followed by LO did not produce firmer apples than continuous SCA in 1984.

Treatment
Initial storage in SCA for >75 days with subsequent storage in LOe0
Outcome
firmer applese0
Direction
did not result in firmere0
Comparator
stored continuously in SCAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Initial storage in SCA for >75 days with subsequent storage in LO (in 1984) did not result in firmer apples than those stored continuously in SCA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–712 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

McIntosh maximum firmness required 7.5 months of initial LO at 0°.

Material
‘McIntosh’e0
Treatment
initial exposure to LO at 0°e0
Outcome
post-storage fruit firmnesse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
7.5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For ‘McIntosh’, ‘Spartan’, and ‘Golden Delicious’ cultivars, respectively, maximum post-storage fruit firmness was reached after 7.5, 4.5, and 1.5 months of initial exposure to LO at 0° and after 4.5, 3.0, and 3.0 months at 3°.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spartan maximum firmness required 4.5 months of initial LO at 0°.

Material
‘Spartan’e0
Treatment
initial exposure to LO at 0°e0
Outcome
post-storage fruit firmnesse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4.5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For ‘McIntosh’, ‘Spartan’, and ‘Golden Delicious’ cultivars, respectively, maximum post-storage fruit firmness was reached after 7.5, 4.5, and 1.5 months of initial exposure to LO at 0° and after 4.5, 3.0, and 3.0 months at 3°.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Golden Delicious maximum firmness required 1.5 months of initial LO at 0°.

Material
‘Golden Delicious’e0
Treatment
initial exposure to LOe0
Outcome
post-storage fruit firmnesse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1.5 monthse0
Qualifier
at 0°e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For ‘McIntosh’, ‘Spartan’, and ‘Golden Delicious’ cultivars, respectively, maximum post-storage fruit firmness was reached after 7.5, 4.5, and 1.5 months of initial exposure to LO at 0° and after 4.5, 3.0, and 3.0 months at 3°.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

McIntosh maximum firmness required 4.5 months of initial LO at 3°.

Material
‘McIntosh’e0
Treatment
initial exposure to LOe0
Outcome
post-storage fruit firmnesse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4.5e0
Qualifier
at 3°e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For ‘McIntosh’, ‘Spartan’, and ‘Golden Delicious’ cultivars, respectively, maximum post-storage fruit firmness was reached after 7.5, 4.5, and 1.5 months of initial exposure to LO at 0° and after 4.5, 3.0, and 3.0 months at 3°.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spartan maximum firmness required 3.0 months of initial LO at 3°.

Material
‘Spartan’e0
Treatment
initial exposure to LOe0
Outcome
post-storage fruit firmnesse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3.0e0
Qualifier
at 3°e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For ‘McIntosh’, ‘Spartan’, and ‘Golden Delicious’ cultivars, respectively, maximum post-storage fruit firmness was reached after 7.5, 4.5, and 1.5 months of initial exposure to LO at 0° and after 4.5, 3.0, and 3.0 months at 3°.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Golden Delicious maximum firmness required 3.0 months of initial LO at 3°.

Material
‘Golden Delicious’e0
Treatment
initial exposure to LOe0
Outcome
post-storage fruit firmnesse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3.0 monthse0
Qualifier
at 3°e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For ‘McIntosh’, ‘Spartan’, and ‘Golden Delicious’ cultivars, respectively, maximum post-storage fruit firmness was reached after 7.5, 4.5, and 1.5 months of initial exposure to LO at 0° and after 4.5, 3.0, and 3.0 months at 3°.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuing LO storage generally decreased poststorage CO2 and ethylene evolution and senescent disorder severity.

Treatment
continuing storage in LOe0
Outcome
Poststorage evolution of CO 2 and C 2 H 4 and the severity of senescent disorderse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
generallye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Poststorage evolution of CO 2 and C 2 H 4 and the severity of senescent disorders generally decreased with continuing storage in LO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1190 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LO storage increased low-oxygen injury incidence.

Treatment
continuing storage in LOe0
Outcome
incidence of low-O 2 injurye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with continuing storage in LO, but the incidence of low-O 2 injury increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exposure to 1.0% oxygen increased ethanol evolution in McIntosh stored at 0°.

Material
‘McIntosh’e0
Treatment
exposure to 1.0% O 2e0
Outcome
Poststorage ethanol evolutione0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
stored at 0°e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Poststorage ethanol evolution increased with exposure to 1.0% O 2 in ‘McIntosh’ apples stored at 0°”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exposure to 1.0% oxygen increased ethanol evolution in Spartan held at 0° or 3°.

Material
‘Spartan’e0
Treatment
exposure to 1.0% O 2e0
Outcome
Poststorage ethanol evolutione0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
held at either 0° or 3°e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Poststorage ethanol evolution increased with exposure to 1.0% O 2 in ‘McIntosh’ apples stored at 0°, and ‘Spartan’ apples held at either 0° or 3°.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1385 · show in text ↑

storage · crop injury · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

co2 · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 19 positive, 5 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
    Low oxygen storage maintained apple firmness by an average 0.86 kg compared with conventional atmospheres.

    Responses of ‘McIntosh’ Apples to Low Oxygen Storage1 · 1981 · compared with conventional controlled atmospheres (5% CO 2 + 2.8% O 2 )

    Same directionCited by this paper

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

storage · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

64 papers: 47 positive, 17 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.