Paper · 1998 · HortScience

Responses of Broccoli Seedlings to Light Quality during Low-temperature Storage in Vitro: I. Morphology and Survival

Sandra B. Wilson; Keiko Iwabuchi; Nihal C. Rajapakse; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Broccoli ( Brassica oleracea L. Botrytis group `Green Duke') seeds were cultured in vitro photoautotrophically (without sugar in the medium) or photomixotrophically (with sugar in the medium) for 3 weeks at 23 °C and 150 μmol·m -2 ·s -1 photosynthetic photon flux ( PPF ). Vessels were then stored at 5 °C under 1.6, 4.1, or 8.6 μmol·m -2 ·s -1 of white (400-800 nm), red (600-700 nm), or blue (400-500 nm) light. Concentrations of CO 2 inside the vessels were monitored until equilibrium was reached. Light compensation point was reached at 3.5 μmol·m -2 ·s -1 for photoautotrophic seedlings and at 6.5 μmol·m -2 ·s -1 for photomixotrophic seedlings. Therefore, in the long-term storage experiment, seedlings were stored for 4, 8, or 12 weeks at 5 °C in darkness or under 5 μmol·m -2 ·s -1 (average light compensation point) of white, red, or blue light. Illumination during storage was necessary to maintain dry mass, leaf area, and regrowth potentials of in vitro seedlings. All seedlings stored in darkness were of poor quality and died when transferred to the greenhouse. Red light during storage increased seedling dry mass and chlorophyll content and improved overall appearance, whereas blue light decreased chlorophyll content and increased stem elongation. The addition of 2% sucrose to media increased dry mass and leaf area and maintained overall seedling quality during illuminated storage. However, plantlets stored for more than 4 weeks did not survive poststorage greenhouse conditions, regardless of light treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The light compensation point was 3.5 μmol·m -2 ·s -1 for photoautotrophic seedlings.

Material
photoautotrophic seedlingse0
Outcome
Light compensation pointe0
Value
3.5 μmol·m -2 ·s -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Light compensation point was reached at 3.5 μmol·m -2 ·s -1 for photoautotrophic seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–592 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The light compensation point was 6.5 μmol·m -2 ·s -1 for photomixotrophic seedlings.

Outcome
photomixotrophic seedlingse0
Value
6.5 μmol·m -2 ·s -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at 6.5 μmol·m -2 ·s -1 for photomixotrophic seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–650 · show in text ↑
t0

“Responses of Broccoli Seedlings to Light Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Illumination during storage maintained seedling dry mass, leaf area and regrowth potential.

Treatment
Illumination during storagee0
Outcome
dry mass, leaf area, and regrowth potentialse0
Direction
maintaine0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Illumination during storage was necessary to maintain dry mass, leaf area, and regrowth potentials of in vitro seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–976 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dark-stored seedlings were poor quality and died after transfer to the greenhouse.

Treatment
darknesse0
Outcome
poor quality and diede0
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All seedlings stored in darkness were of poor quality and died when transferred to the greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red light increased seedling dry mass and chlorophyll content and improved appearance.

Treatment
Red lighte0
Outcome
seedling dry mass and chlorophyll content and improved overall appearancee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Red light during storage increased seedling dry mass and chlorophyll content and improved overall appearance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1185 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue light decreased chlorophyll content.

Treatment
blue lighte0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“blue light decreased chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1235 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue light increased stem elongation.

Treatment
blue lighte0
Outcome
stem elongatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“blue light decreased chlorophyll content and increased stem elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1265 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 2% sucrose increased dry mass and leaf area and maintained seedling quality during illuminated storage.

Treatment
2% sucrosee0
Outcome
dry mass and leaf area and maintained overall seedling qualitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of 2% sucrose to media increased dry mass and leaf area and maintained overall seedling quality during illuminated storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plantlets stored more than four weeks did not survive greenhouse conditions regardless of light treatment.

Outcome
did not survivee0
Qualifier
more than 4 weekse0
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plantlets stored for more than 4 weeks did not survive poststorage greenhouse conditions, regardless of light treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1532 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–31 · show in text ↑

sucrose · quality: general · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

light · quality: general · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

storage · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

light · physiology: pigments · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 29 positive, 3 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

light · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 40 positive, 14 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.