Paper · 2016 · Journal of progressive agriculture

Impact study on climate resilient technology demonstrated in NICRA village-Choma kot in Vertisol of Rajasthan

B. S. Meena; Ganga Sahay Meena; K.C. Meena

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Chaumakot in Kota district of Rajasthan is a water scarcity village. The annual rainfall is 780 mm. The soil of the village is clay loam heavy textured with pH 8.20–8.53, low in available nitrogen (145–160 kg/ha), organic carbon (0.48–0.50%), medium in available phosphorus (23–34 kg/ha) and high in available potassium (345–365 kg/ha). Climate-resilient technologies i.e. raised bed planting in soybean and wheat, short duration varieties of soybean (JS 95–60 and JS 93–05), in-situ moisture conservation by field bunding, Broad bed furrow, deep ploughing and inter cropping on soybean + maize (5: 2 rows) were demonstrated at farmer fields along with existing practices during kharif and rabi seasons of 2011–2013 under NICRA. Results revealed that raised bed planting in soybean and wheat gave the highest seed yield (18.25 and 61.92 q/ha) and B: C ratio (3.44 and 4.65), respectively in comparison to conventional sowing. Drought resistant variety JS 95–60 took minimum number of days for attaining maturity and gave higher seed yield(17.60 q/ha) and B;C ratio(3.18) over check variety JS 335. Cultivation of soybean and mustard after adaptation of moisture conservation technologies proved better with 43.42, 16.12 and 12.77% increased in seed yield of bunding-soybean, deep ploughing-soybean and BBF-mustard plots over the respective check. Inter cropping of Soybean + Maize (5: 2 rows) system produced higher profit (Rs 60, 360/ha) and B: C ratio (3.48) over sole soybean and maize and the system was found more efficient, profitable and suitable for rainfed situations. These climateresilient technologies will help the farmers to cope with such extremes situations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised bed planting gave the highest seed yield in soybean: 18.25, compared with conventional sowing.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
raised bed plantinge0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
18.25e0
Comparator
conventional sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results revealed that raised bed planting in soybean and wheat gave the highest seed yield (18.25 and 61.92 q/ha) and B: C ratio (3.44 and 4.65), respectively in comparison to conventional sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–925 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised bed planting gave the highest seed yield in wheat: 61.92 q/ha, compared with conventional sowing.

Treatment
raised bed plantinge0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
61.92 q/hae0
Comparator
conventional sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results revealed that raised bed planting in soybean and wheat gave the highest seed yield (18.25 and 61.92 q/ha) and B: C ratio (3.44 and 4.65), respectively in comparison to conventional sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–925 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised bed planting gave the highest B: C ratio in soybean: 3.44, compared with conventional sowing.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
raised bed plantinge0
Outcome
B: C ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.44e0
Comparator
conventional sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results revealed that raised bed planting in soybean and wheat gave the highest seed yield (18.25 and 61.92 q/ha) and B: C ratio (3.44 and 4.65), respectively in comparison to conventional sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–925 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised bed planting gave the highest B: C ratio in wheat: 4.65, compared with conventional sowing.

Treatment
raised bed plantinge0
Outcome
B: C ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.65e0
Comparator
conventional sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results revealed that raised bed planting in soybean and wheat gave the highest seed yield (18.25 and 61.92 q/ha) and B: C ratio (3.44 and 4.65), respectively in comparison to conventional sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–925 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

bunding-soybean increased soybean seed yield by 43.42 over its check.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
bunding-soybeane0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
43.42e0
Comparator
respective checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivation of soybean and mustard after adaptation of moisture conservation technologies proved better with 43.42, 16.12 and 12.77% increased in seed yield of bunding-soybean, deep ploughing-soybean and BBF-mustard plots over the respective check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1346 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

deep ploughing-soybean increased soybean seed yield by 16.12 over its check.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
deep ploughing-soybeane0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16.12e0
Comparator
respective checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivation of soybean and mustard after adaptation of moisture conservation technologies proved better with 43.42, 16.12 and 12.77% increased in seed yield of bunding-soybean, deep ploughing-soybean and BBF-mustard plots over the respective check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1346 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BBF-mustard increased mustard seed yield by 12.77% over its check.

Taxon
mustarde0
Treatment
BBF-mustarde0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.77%e0
Comparator
respective checke0

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivation of soybean and mustard after adaptation of moisture conservation technologies proved better with 43.42, 16.12 and 12.77% increased in seed yield of bunding-soybean, deep ploughing-soybean and BBF-mustard plots over the respective check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1346 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean and maize intercropping gave higher profit (Rs 60, 360/ha) than sole crops.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Inter cropping of Soybean + Maize (5: 2 rows)e0
Outcome
profite0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs 60, 360/hae0
Comparator
sole soybean and maizee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inter cropping of Soybean + Maize (5: 2 rows) system produced higher profit (Rs 60, 360/ha) and B: C ratio (3.48) over sole soybean and maize and the system was found more efficient, profitable and suitable for rainfed situations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1577 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean and maize intercropping gave higher B: C ratio (3.48) than sole crops.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Inter cropping of Soybean + Maize (5: 2 rows)e0
Outcome
B: C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.48e0
Comparator
sole soybean and maizee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inter cropping of Soybean + Maize (5: 2 rows) system produced higher profit (Rs 60, 360/ha) and B: C ratio (3.48) over sole soybean and maize and the system was found more efficient, profitable and suitable for rainfed situations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1577 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean and maize intercropping was judged more efficient and suitable for rainfed situations.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
more efficient, profitable and suitable for rainfed situationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inter cropping of Soybean + Maize (5: 2 rows) system produced higher profit (Rs 60, 360/ha) and B: C ratio (3.48) over sole soybean and maize and the system was found more efficient, profitable and suitable for rainfed situations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1577 · show in text ↑

Zea mays · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 58 positive, 21 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

intercropping · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

218 papers: 131 positive, 87 negative or no effect

130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 79 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

214 papers more in this group

See all 218 papers →

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.