Paper · 2016 · Plant Cell & Environment

Time of day determines Arabidopsis transcriptome and growth dynamics under mild drought

Marieke Dubois; Hannes Claeys; Lisa Van den Broeck; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
117
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Drought stress is a major problem for agriculture worldwide, causing significant yield losses. Plants have developed highly flexible mechanisms to deal with drought, including organ- and developmental stage-specific responses. In young leaves, growth is repressed as an active mechanism to save water and energy, increasing the chances of survival but decreasing yield. Despite its importance, the molecular basis for this growth inhibition is largely unknown. Here, we present a novel approach to explore early molecular mechanisms controlling Arabidopsis leaf growth inhibition following mild drought. We found that growth and transcriptome responses to drought are highly dynamic. Growth was only repressed by drought during the day, and our evidence suggests that this may be due to gating by the circadian clock. Similarly, time of day strongly affected the extent, specificity, and in certain cases even direction of drought-induced changes in gene expression. These findings underscore the importance of taking into account diurnal patterns to understand stress responses, as only a small core of drought-responsive genes are affected by drought at all times of the day. Finally, we leveraged our high-resolution data to demonstrate that phenotypic and transcriptome responses can be matched to identify putative novel regulators of growth under mild drought.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth responses to drought were highly dynamic.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Outcome
growthe0
Qualifier
highly dynamice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We found that growth and transcriptome responses to drought are highly dynamic.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–683 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transcriptome responses to drought were highly dynamic.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Outcome
transcriptome responses to droughte0
Qualifier
highly dynamice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We found that growth and transcriptome responses to drought are highly dynamic.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–683 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought repressed Arabidopsis growth only during the day.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
Growthe0
Direction
repressede0
Qualifier
during the daye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth was only repressed by drought during the day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–735 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–34 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Circadian clock gating may explain daytime growth repression by drought.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Outcome
Growth was only repressed by drought during the daye1
Qualifier
gating by the circadian clocke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“our evidence suggests that this may be due to gating by the circadian clock.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–817 · show in text ↑
e1

“Growth was only repressed by drought during the day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–735 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–34 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Time of day strongly affected the extent, specificity and sometimes direction of drought induced gene expression changes.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
drought-induced changes in gene expressione0
Qualifier
time of daye0

Not reportedSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“time of day strongly affected the extent, specificity, and in certain cases even direction of drought-induced changes in gene expression.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–966 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only a small core of drought responsive genes responded at all times of day.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Gene
drought-responsive genese0
Outcome
drought-responsive genes are affected by drought at all times of the daye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only a small core of drought-responsive genes are affected by drought at all times of the day.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–34 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Matching phenotype and transcriptome responses identified putative novel regulators of growth under mild drought.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Outcome
identify putative novel regulators of growth under mild droughte0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“phenotypic and transcriptome responses can be matched to identify putative novel regulators of growth under mild drought.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1366 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–34 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · ArabidopsisPositive and negative results

12 papers: 2 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.