Paper · 2006 · Acta Horticulturae

EFFECTS OF IRRADIATION ON QUALITY ATTRIBUTES OF TWO CULTIVARS OF MANGO

A. Uthairatanakij; P. Jitareerat; S. Kanlavanarat

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Irradiation is a commercial technology for reducing postharvest losses, reducing microbial infections and fruit fly infestation and extending shelf-life of fresh produce. The effects of gamma irradiation at 0, 0.4 and 0.6 kGy from Cobalt 60 on the texture, colour and disease incidence in mangoes were investigated. The mangoes cv. Nam Dokmai and Chok Anan were harvested at the 70% and 90% stages of maturity and assessed after ripening at 25°C. Ripened 'Chok Anan' mangoes harvested at 70% and 90% maturity were softer than untreated fruits. In contrast, ripened irradiated 'Nam Dokmai' mangoes appeared firmer compared to untreated fruits. Polygalacturonase activity in 'Nam Dokmai' mangoes of 90% maturity was not affected by gamma irradiation. Gamma irradiation had no effect on skin or flesh colour and soluble solids content of mangoes of both cultivars harvested at both maturity stages. It was concluded that gamma irradiation at doses up to 0.6 kGy had no adverse effects on ripening of the test mangoes harvested at both maturity stages.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiated Chok Anan mangoes at both maturity stages were softer than untreated fruit.

Material
Chok Anane0
Organ / stage
70% and 90% maturitye0
Treatment
gamma irradiatione1
Outcome
softere0
Direction
softere0
Comparator
untreated fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ripened 'Chok Anan' mangoes harvested at 70% and 90% maturity were softer than untreated fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–542 · show in text ↑
e1

“gamma irradiation at 0, 0.4 and 0.6 kGy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–225 · show in text ↑
t0

“MANGO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiated Nam Dokmai mangoes were firmer than untreated fruit.

Material
Nam Dokmaie0
Treatment
gamma irradiatione1
Outcome
firmere0
Direction
firmere0
Comparator
untreated fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ripened irradiated 'Nam Dokmai' mangoes appeared firmer compared to untreated fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–641 · show in text ↑
e1

“gamma irradiation at 0, 0.4 and 0.6 kGy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–225 · show in text ↑
t0

“MANGO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gamma irradiation did not affect polygalacturonase activity in Nam Dokmai mangoes at 90% maturity.

Material
Nam Dokmaie0
Organ / stage
90% maturitye0
Treatment
gamma irradiatione0
Gene
Polygalacturonasee0
Outcome
Polygalacturonase activitye0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Polygalacturonase activity in 'Nam Dokmai' mangoes of 90% maturity was not affected by gamma irradiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–747 · show in text ↑
t0

“MANGO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation did not affect skin or flesh colour or soluble solids in either cultivar.

Treatment
Gamma irradiatione0
Outcome
skin or flesh colour and soluble solids contente0
Direction
no effecte0
Qualifier
both cultivars harvested at both maturity stagese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gamma irradiation had no effect on skin or flesh colour and soluble solids content of mangoes of both cultivars harvested at both maturity stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“MANGO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–70 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that irradiation up to 0.6 kGy caused no adverse ripening effects.

Treatment
gamma irradiation at doses up to 0.6 kGye0
Outcome
ripeninge0
Direction
no adverse effectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gamma irradiation at doses up to 0.6 kGy had no adverse effects on ripening of the test mangoes harvested at both maturity stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1047 · show in text ↑
t0

“MANGO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–70 · show in text ↑

radiation · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.