Paper · 1967 · Journal of Food Science

Irradiation Effects on the Ripening of Kent Mangoes

R.A. DENNISON; E.M. AHMED

18
claims
35
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY— Kent mango fruit irradiated with 0, 100, 200, and 300 Krad were ripened at 20°C for 0, 4, and 8 days. Irradiated mangoes were less firm than control fruit immediately after irradiation, but fruit softening due to ripeness was more pronounced than softening induced by irradiation. Irradiated fruit contained higher water‐soluble and lower Versene‐vinsoluble pectic fractions as compared to unirradiated fruit. NO differences were observed in the content of the Versene‐soluble fraction among all irradiation dosages. Higher PE activities were exhibited by the irradiated fruit throughout the ripening period. Irradiated fruit contained higher AIS and lower soluble solids than control fruit. No differences in sucrose content due to irradiation were observed, but there were less reducing and total sugars at the 300 Krad dose as compared to other dosages. Changes in pectic fractions and PE activity were more pronounced immediately following irradiation in comparison to those occurring during ripening. The increase in soluble solids as well as sucrose, and the decrease in AIS, titratable acidity, reducing sugars and firmness during ripening proceeded at faster rates in control fruit than in the irradiated fruit. These variable rates of change were reflected by the significant irradiation dose and storage duration interactions. Results suggest that irradiation induces a delay in ripening of Kent mangoes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiated mangoes were less firm than control fruit immediately after irradiation.

Taxon
mangoesMangifera indicae0
Material
Kentt0
Treatment
Irradiatede0
Outcome
firme0
Direction
less firme0
Qualifier
immediately after irradiatione0
Comparator
control fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irradiated mangoes were less firm than control fruit immediately after irradiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–193 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kent Mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ripening softened mango fruit more strongly than irradiation.

Taxon
MangoesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
ripenesse0
Outcome
fruit softeninge0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Comparator
irradiatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit softening due to ripeness was more pronounced than softening induced by irradiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–288 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kent Mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiated mango fruit had higher water-soluble pectic fractions than unirradiated fruit.

Taxon
MangoesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
Irradiatede0
Outcome
water‐solublee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
unirradiated fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irradiated fruit contained higher water‐soluble and lower Versene‐vinsoluble pectic fractions as compared to unirradiated fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–418 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kent Mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiated mango fruit had lower Versene-vinsoluble pectic fractions than unirradiated fruit.

Taxon
MangoesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
Irradiatede0
Outcome
Versene‐vinsoluble pectic fractionse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
unirradiated fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irradiated fruit contained higher water‐soluble and lower Versene‐vinsoluble pectic fractions as compared to unirradiated fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–418 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kent Mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Versene-soluble fraction content did not differ among irradiation dosages.

Taxon
MangoesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
irradiation dosagese0
Outcome
content of the Versene‐soluble fractione0
Direction
NO differencese0
Comparator
all irradiation dosagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NO differences were observed in the content of the Versene‐soluble fraction among all irradiation dosages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–525 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kent Mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiated fruit had higher PE activity throughout ripening.

Taxon
MangoesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
irradiatede0
Outcome
PE activitiese0
Direction
Highere0
Qualifier
throughout the ripening periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher PE activities were exhibited by the irradiated fruit throughout the ripening period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–617 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kent Mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiated fruit had higher AIS than controls.

Taxon
MangoesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
Irradiatede0
Outcome
AISe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irradiated fruit contained higher AIS and lower soluble solids than control fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–700 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kent Mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiated fruit had lower soluble solids than controls.

Taxon
MangoesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
Irradiatede0
Outcome
soluble solidse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
control fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irradiated fruit contained higher AIS and lower soluble solids than control fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–700 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kent Mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose content did not differ with irradiation.

Taxon
MangoesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
irradiatione0
Outcome
sucrose contente0
Direction
No differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No differences in sucrose content due to irradiation were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–767 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kent Mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 300 Krad dose resulted in less reducing sugar than other dosages.

Taxon
MangoesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
300 Krad dosee0
Outcome
reducinge0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
other dosagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were less reducing and total sugars at the 300 Krad dose as compared to other dosages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kent Mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 300 Krad dose resulted in less total sugar than other dosages.

Taxon
MangoesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
300 Krad dosee0
Outcome
total sugarse0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
other dosagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were less reducing and total sugars at the 300 Krad dose as compared to other dosages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kent Mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pectic fraction changes were more pronounced immediately after irradiation than during ripening.

Taxon
MangoesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
irradiatione0
Outcome
Changes in pectic fractionse0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Qualifier
immediately following irradiatione0
Comparator
during ripeninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Changes in pectic fractions and PE activity were more pronounced immediately following irradiation in comparison to those occurring during ripening.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kent Mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PE activity changes were more pronounced immediately after irradiation than during ripening.

Taxon
MangoesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
irradiatione0
Outcome
PE activitye0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Qualifier
immediately following irradiatione0
Comparator
during ripeninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Changes in pectic fractions and PE activity were more pronounced immediately following irradiation in comparison to those occurring during ripening.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kent Mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During ripening, soluble solids and sucrose increased faster in control than irradiated fruit.

Taxon
MangoesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
control fruite0
Outcome
soluble solids as well as sucrosee0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
during ripeninge0
Comparator
irradiated fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in soluble solids as well as sucrose, and the decrease in AIS, titratable acidity, reducing sugars and firmness during ripening proceeded at faster rates in control fruit than in the irradiated fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kent Mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During ripening, AIS, titratable acidity, and reducing sugars decreased faster in control than irradiated fruit.

Taxon
MangoesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
control fruite0
Outcome
AIS, titratable acidity, reducing sugarse0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
during ripeninge0
Comparator
irradiated fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in soluble solids as well as sucrose, and the decrease in AIS, titratable acidity, reducing sugars and firmness during ripening proceeded at faster rates in control fruit than in the irradiated fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kent Mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During ripening, firmness decreased faster in control than irradiated fruit.

Taxon
MangoesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
control fruite0
Outcome
firmnesse0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
during ripeninge0
Comparator
irradiated fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in soluble solids as well as sucrose, and the decrease in AIS, titratable acidity, reducing sugars and firmness during ripening proceeded at faster rates in control fruit than in the irradiated fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kent Mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation dose and storage duration interacted significantly in the rates of ripening changes.

Taxon
MangoesMangifera indicat0
Treatment
irradiation dosee0
Outcome
variable rates of changee0
Qualifier
storage duration interactionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These variable rates of change were reflected by the significant irradiation dose and storage duration interactions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1345 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kent Mangoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that irradiation delays ripening of Kent mangoes.

Taxon
Kent mangoese0
Treatment
irradiatione0
Outcome
delay in ripeninge0
Direction
delaye0

Verbatim

e0

“Results suggest that irradiation induces a delay in ripening of Kent mangoes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1423 · show in text ↑

radiation · molecular: metabolites · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

radiation · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.