Paper · 2016 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Cu-Chitosan Nanoparticle Mediated Sustainable Approach To Enhance Seedling Growth in Maize by Mobilizing Reserved Food

Vinod Saharan; R. V. Kumaraswamy; Ram Chandra Choudhary; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
311
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Food crop seedlings often have susceptibility to various abiotic and biotic stresses. Therefore, in the present study, we investigated the impact of Cu-chitosan nanoparticles (NPs) on physiological and biochemical changes during maize seedling growth. Higher values of percent germination, shoot and root length, root number, seedling length, fresh and dry weight, and seed vigor index were obtained at 0.04-0.12% concentrations of Cu-chitosan NPs as compared to water, CuSO4, and bulk chitosan treatments. Cu-chitosan NPs at the same concentrations induced the activities of α-amylase and protease enzymes and also increased the total protein content in germinating seeds. The increased activities of α-amylase and protease enzymes corroborated with decreased content of starch and protein, respectively, in the germinating seeds. Cu-chitosan NPs at 0.16% and CuSO4 at 0.01% concentrations showed inhibitory effect on seedling growth. The observed results on seedling growth could be explained by the toxicity of excess Cu and growth promotory effect of Cu-chitosan NPs. Physiological and biochemical studies suggest that Cu-chitosan NPs enhance the seedling growth of maize by mobilizing the reserved food, primarily starch, through the higher activity of α-amylase.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.04-0.12%, Cu-chitosan nanoparticles increased germination and seed vigor relative to water, CuSO4 and bulk chitosan.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
seedlinge0
Treatment
0.04-0.12% concentrations of Cu-chitosan NPse0
Outcome
percent germinatione0
Direction
Highere0
Comparator
water, CuSO4, and bulk chitosan treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher values of percent germination, shoot and root length, root number, seedling length, fresh and dry weight, and seed vigor index were obtained at 0.04-0.12% concentrations of Cu-chitosan NPs as compared to water, CuSO4, and bulk chitosan treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–505 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.04-0.12%, Cu-chitosan nanoparticles increased shoot and root length, root number and seedling length relative to comparator treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
0.04-0.12% concentrations of Cu-chitosan NPse0
Outcome
shoot and root length, root number, seedling lengthe0
Direction
Highere0
Comparator
water, CuSO4, and bulk chitosan treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher values of percent germination, shoot and root length, root number, seedling length, fresh and dry weight, and seed vigor index were obtained at 0.04-0.12% concentrations of Cu-chitosan NPs as compared to water, CuSO4, and bulk chitosan treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–505 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.04-0.12%, Cu-chitosan nanoparticles increased fresh and dry weight relative to comparator treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
0.04-0.12% concentrations of Cu-chitosan NPse0
Outcome
fresh and dry weighte0
Direction
Highere0
Comparator
water, CuSO4, and bulk chitosan treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher values of percent germination, shoot and root length, root number, seedling length, fresh and dry weight, and seed vigor index were obtained at 0.04-0.12% concentrations of Cu-chitosan NPs as compared to water, CuSO4, and bulk chitosan treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–505 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu-chitosan nanoparticles induced α-amylase and protease activities in germinating maize seeds.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
germinating seedse1
Treatment
Cu-chitosan NPse0
Outcome
activities of α-amylase and protease enzymese0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cu-chitosan NPs at the same concentrations induced the activities of α-amylase and protease enzymes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–606 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“in germinating seeds. The increased activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–698 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu-chitosan nanoparticles increased total protein content in germinating maize seeds.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
germinating seedse0
Treatment
Cu-chitosan NPse1
Outcome
total protein contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased the total protein content in germinating seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–672 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cu-chitosan NPs at the same concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–549 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher enzyme activities coincided with decreased starch and protein content in germinating seeds.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
germinating seedse0
Gene
α-amylase and protease enzymese0
Outcome
content of starch and proteine0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increased activities of α-amylase and protease enzymes corroborated with decreased content of starch and protein, respectively, in the germinating seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–830 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu-chitosan nanoparticles at 0.16% inhibited seedling growth.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Cu-chitosan NPs at 0.16%e0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
inhibitorye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cu-chitosan NPs at 0.16% and CuSO4 at 0.01% concentrations showed inhibitory effect on seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CuSO4 at 0.01% inhibited seedling growth.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
CuSO4 at 0.01%e0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
inhibitorye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cu-chitosan NPs at 0.16% and CuSO4 at 0.01% concentrations showed inhibitory effect on seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute maize seedling growth promotion to reserve starch mobilization through greater α-amylase activity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Cu-chitosan NPse0
Gene
α-amylasee0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Qualifier
mobilizing the reserved food, primarily starche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cu-chitosan NPs enhance the seedling growth of maize by mobilizing the reserved food, primarily starch, through the higher activity of α-amylase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1267 · show in text ↑

copper(II) sulfate · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

182 papers: 161 positive, 21 negative or no effect

160 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

178 papers more in this group

See all 182 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: enzyme activity · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.