Abstract
Peaches stored in air for 40 days at OC developed severe internal breakdown and poor quality after transferring them to 20C to ripen. Comparable fruit stored under controlled atmosphere (1% O 2 + 5% CO 2 ) and then ripened at 20C had no breakdown and retained good quality. Fruit stored under CA had less reducing sugars but more sucrose than air stored fruit. Fruit pH increased and titratable acidity decreased over a 40 day storage period. Citric acid increased slightly while malic acid decreased during storage. Little or no differences in overall acidity and individual organic acids existed between CA and air storage. Little or no change in individual phenolic acid content occurred during storage or between CA and air storage. Internal color darkened and became redder with storage. CA stored fruit was significantly firmer than air stored fruit. Sensory evaluation indicated CA stored fruit was more acidic, sweeter, and had better overall flavor than air stored fruit.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Air stored peaches developed severe breakdown and poor quality after ripening.
- Taxon
- Peaches
Prunus persicae0 - Treatment
- stored in air for 40 days at OCe0
- Outcome
- severe internal breakdown and poor qualitye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Peaches stored in air for 40 days at OC developed severe internal breakdown and poor quality after transferring them to 20C to ripen”
Claim · model-written summary
Controlled atmosphere fruit had no breakdown and retained good quality after ripening.
- Taxon
- Peaches
Prunus persicae1 - Treatment
- controlled atmosphere (1% O 2 + 5% CO 2 )e0
- Outcome
- no breakdown and retained good qualitye0
- Comparator
- stored in aire1
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Comparable fruit stored under controlled atmosphere (1% O 2 + 5% CO 2 ) and then ripened at 20C had no breakdown and retained good quality”
e1“Peaches stored in air for 40 days at OC”
Claim · model-written summary
Controlled atmosphere fruit had less reducing sugar than air stored fruit.
- Taxon
- PEACH
Prunus persicat0 - Treatment
- CAe0
- Outcome
- reducing sugarse0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Comparator
- air stored fruite0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Fruit stored under CA had less reducing sugars but more sucrose than air stored fruit”
t0“PEACH QUALITY”
Claim · model-written summary
Controlled atmosphere fruit had more sucrose than air stored fruit.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Fruit stored under CA had less reducing sugars but more sucrose than air stored fruit”
t0“PEACH QUALITY”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit pH rose over 40 days of storage.
- Taxon
- PEACH
Prunus persicat0 - Outcome
- Fruit pHe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- 40 day storage periode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Fruit pH increased and titratable acidity decreased over a 40 day storage period”
t0“PEACH QUALITY”
Claim · model-written summary
Titratable acidity fell over 40 days of storage.
- Taxon
- PEACH
Prunus persicat0 - Outcome
- titratable aciditye0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Qualifier
- 40 day storage periode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Fruit pH increased and titratable acidity decreased over a 40 day storage period”
t0“PEACH QUALITY”
Claim · model-written summary
Citric acid increased slightly during storage.
- Taxon
- PEACH
Prunus persicat0 - Outcome
- Citric acide0
- Direction
- increased slightlye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Citric acid increased slightly while malic acid decreased during storage”
t0“PEACH QUALITY”
Claim · model-written summary
Malic acid decreased during storage.
- Taxon
- PEACH
Prunus persicat0 - Outcome
- malic acide0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Citric acid increased slightly while malic acid decreased during storage”
t0“PEACH QUALITY”
Claim · model-written summary
Overall acidity and individual organic acids differed little between air and controlled atmosphere storage.
- Taxon
- PEACH
Prunus persicat0 - Treatment
- CAe0
- Outcome
- overall acidity and individual organic acidse0
- Direction
- Little or no differencese0
- Comparator
- air storagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Little or no differences in overall acidity and individual organic acids existed between CA and air storage”
t0“PEACH QUALITY”
Claim · model-written summary
Individual phenolic acids changed little during storage or between atmospheres.
- Taxon
- PEACH
Prunus persicat0 - Outcome
- individual phenolic acid contente0
- Direction
- Little or no changee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Little or no change in individual phenolic acid content occurred during storage or between CA and air storage”
t0“PEACH QUALITY”
Claim · model-written summary
Internal color darkened and reddened with storage.
- Taxon
- PEACH
Prunus persicat0 - Outcome
- Internal colore0
- Direction
- darkenede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Internal color darkened and became redder with storage”
t0“PEACH QUALITY”
Claim · model-written summary
Controlled atmosphere fruit was significantly firmer than air stored fruit.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“CA stored fruit was significantly firmer than air stored fruit”
t0“PEACH QUALITY”
Claim · model-written summary
Sensory evaluation rated controlled atmosphere fruit more acidic, sweeter and better in overall flavor.
- Taxon
- PEACH
Prunus persicat0 - Treatment
- CAe0
- Outcome
- more acidic, sweeter, and had better overall flavore0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- air stored fruite0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“CA stored fruit was more acidic, sweeter, and had better overall flavor than air stored fruit”
t0“PEACH QUALITY”
The same questions in other papers
co2 · quality: general · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →storage · quality: general · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.