Paper · 2016 · Global Change Biology

Plant adaptation or acclimation to rising CO2? Insight from first multigenerational RNA‐Seq transcriptome

Alexander Watson‐Lazowski; Yunan Lin; Franco Miglietta; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
49
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Atmospheric carbon dioxide ( CO 2 ) directly determines the rate of plant photosynthesis and indirectly effects plant productivity and fitness and may therefore act as a selective pressure driving evolution, but evidence to support this contention is sparse. Using Plantago lanceolata L. seed collected from a naturally high CO 2 spring and adjacent ambient CO 2 control site, we investigated multigenerational response to future, elevated atmospheric CO 2 . Plants were grown in either ambient or elevated CO 2 (700 μmol mol −1 ), enabling for the first time, characterization of the functional and population genomics of plant acclimation and adaptation to elevated CO 2 . This revealed that spring and control plants differed significantly in phenotypic plasticity for traits underpinning fitness including above‐ground biomass, leaf size, epidermal cell size and number and stomatal density and index. Gene expression responses to elevated CO 2 (acclimation) were modest [33–131 genes differentially expressed ( DE )], whilst those between control and spring plants (adaptation) were considerably larger (689–853 DE genes). In contrast, population genomic analysis showed that genetic differentiation between spring and control plants was close to zero, with no fixed differences, suggesting that plants are adapted to their native CO 2 environment at the level of gene expression. An unusual phenotype of increased stomatal index in spring but not control plants in elevated CO 2 correlated with altered expression of stomatal patterning genes between spring and control plants for three loci ( YODA , CDKB 1;1 and SCRM 2 ) and between ambient and elevated CO 2 for four loci ( ER , YODA , MYB 88 and BCA 1 ). We propose that the two positive regulators of stomatal number ( SCRM 2 ) and CDKB 1;1 when upregulated act as key controllers of stomatal adaptation to elevated CO 2 . Combined with significant transcriptome reprogramming of photosynthetic and dark respiration and enhanced growth in spring plants, we have identified the potential basis of plant adaptation to high CO 2 likely to occur over coming decades.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring and control Plantago plants differed significantly in phenotypic plasticity for above-ground biomass, leaf size and epidermal cell size.

Taxon
Plantago lanceolata L.Plantago lanceolatae0
Material
spring and control plantse2
Outcome
phenotypic plasticitye2
Qualifier
above‐ground biomass, leaf size, epidermal cell sizee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plantago lanceolata
Plantago lanceolata · Taxonsannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using Plantago lanceolata L. seed collected from a naturally high CO 2 spring and adjacent ambient CO 2 control site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–384 · show in text ↑
e2

“spring and control plants differed significantly in phenotypic plasticity for traits underpinning fitness including above‐ground biomass, leaf size, epidermal cell size and number and stomatal density and index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–913 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring and control Plantago plants differed significantly in phenotypic plasticity for epidermal cell number and stomatal density and index.

Taxon
Plantago lanceolata L.Plantago lanceolatae0
Material
spring and control plantse2
Outcome
phenotypic plasticitye2
Qualifier
stomatal density and indexe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plantago lanceolata
Plantago lanceolata · Taxonsannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using Plantago lanceolata L. seed collected from a naturally high CO 2 spring and adjacent ambient CO 2 control site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–384 · show in text ↑
e2

“spring and control plants differed significantly in phenotypic plasticity for traits underpinning fitness including above‐ground biomass, leaf size, epidermal cell size and number and stomatal density and index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–913 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gene expression responses to elevated CO2 (acclimation) were modest, with 33-131 differentially expressed genes.

Taxon
Plantago lanceolata L.Plantago lanceolatae0
Treatment
elevated CO 2e1
Outcome
gene expression responses to elevated CO 2 (acclimation)e1
Value
33–131 genes differentially expressede1
Qualifier
modeste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plantago lanceolata
Plantago lanceolata · Taxonsannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using Plantago lanceolata L. seed collected from a naturally high CO 2 spring and adjacent ambient CO 2 control site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–384 · show in text ↑
e1

“Gene expression responses to elevated CO 2 (acclimation) were modest [33–131 genes differentially expressed ( DE )], whilst those between control and spring plants (adaptation) were considerably larger (689–853 DE genes)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1135 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gene expression differences between control and spring plants (adaptation) were considerably larger, with 689-853 DE genes.

Taxon
Plantago lanceolata L.Plantago lanceolatae0
Material
control and spring plantse1
Outcome
gene expression responsese1
Value
689–853 DE genese1
Qualifier
considerably largere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plantago lanceolata
Plantago lanceolata · Taxonsannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using Plantago lanceolata L. seed collected from a naturally high CO 2 spring and adjacent ambient CO 2 control site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–384 · show in text ↑
e1

“Gene expression responses to elevated CO 2 (acclimation) were modest [33–131 genes differentially expressed ( DE )], whilst those between control and spring plants (adaptation) were considerably larger (689–853 DE genes)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1135 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genetic differentiation between spring and control Plantago plants was close to zero, with no fixed differences.

Taxon
Plantago lanceolata L.Plantago lanceolatae0
Material
spring and control plantse3
Outcome
genetic differentiation between spring and control plantse3
Qualifier
close to zero, with no fixed differencese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plantago lanceolata
Plantago lanceolata · Taxonsannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using Plantago lanceolata L. seed collected from a naturally high CO 2 spring and adjacent ambient CO 2 control site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–384 · show in text ↑
e3

“population genomic analysis showed that genetic differentiation between spring and control plants was close to zero, with no fixed differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1292 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Plantago plants are adapted to their native CO2 environment at the level of gene expression.

Taxon
Plantago lanceolata L.Plantago lanceolatae0
Outcome
adapted to their native CO 2 environmente7
Qualifier
at the level of gene expressione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plantago lanceolata
Plantago lanceolata · Taxonsannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using Plantago lanceolata L. seed collected from a naturally high CO 2 spring and adjacent ambient CO 2 control site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–384 · show in text ↑
e7

“suggesting that plants are adapted to their native CO 2 environment at the level of gene expression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1393 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal index increased in spring plants but not control plants under elevated CO2.

Taxon
Plantago lanceolata L.Plantago lanceolatae0
Material
springe4
Treatment
elevated CO 2e4
Outcome
stomatal indexe4
Direction
increasede4
Comparator
control plantse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plantago lanceolata
Plantago lanceolata · Taxonsannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using Plantago lanceolata L. seed collected from a naturally high CO 2 spring and adjacent ambient CO 2 control site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–384 · show in text ↑
e4

“An unusual phenotype of increased stomatal index in spring but not control plants in elevated CO 2 correlated with altered expression of stomatal patterning genes between spring and control plants for three loci ( YODA , CDKB 1;1 and SCRM 2 ) and between ambient and elevated CO 2 for four loci ( ER , YODA , MYB 88 and BCA 1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1722 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal patterning gene expression was altered between spring and control plants at three loci (YODA, CDKB1;1 and SCRM2).

Taxon
Plantago lanceolata L.Plantago lanceolatae0
Material
spring and control plantse4
Gene
YODA , CDKB 1;1 and SCRM 2e4
Outcome
expression of stomatal patterning genese4
Direction
alterede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plantago lanceolata
Plantago lanceolata · Taxonsannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using Plantago lanceolata L. seed collected from a naturally high CO 2 spring and adjacent ambient CO 2 control site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–384 · show in text ↑
e4

“An unusual phenotype of increased stomatal index in spring but not control plants in elevated CO 2 correlated with altered expression of stomatal patterning genes between spring and control plants for three loci ( YODA , CDKB 1;1 and SCRM 2 ) and between ambient and elevated CO 2 for four loci ( ER , YODA , MYB 88 and BCA 1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1722 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal patterning gene expression was altered between ambient and elevated CO2 at four loci (ER, YODA, MYB88 and BCA1).

Taxon
Plantago lanceolata L.Plantago lanceolatae0
Treatment
elevated CO 2e4
Gene
ER , YODA , MYB 88 and BCA 1e4
Outcome
expression of stomatal patterning genese4
Direction
alterede4
Comparator
ambiente4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plantago lanceolata
Plantago lanceolata · Taxonsannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using Plantago lanceolata L. seed collected from a naturally high CO 2 spring and adjacent ambient CO 2 control site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–384 · show in text ↑
e4

“An unusual phenotype of increased stomatal index in spring but not control plants in elevated CO 2 correlated with altered expression of stomatal patterning genes between spring and control plants for three loci ( YODA , CDKB 1;1 and SCRM 2 ) and between ambient and elevated CO 2 for four loci ( ER , YODA , MYB 88 and BCA 1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1722 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

SCRM2 and CDKB1;1, when upregulated, may be key controllers of stomatal adaptation to elevated CO2.

Taxon
Plantago lanceolata L.Plantago lanceolatae0
Gene
SCRM 2e5
Outcome
stomatal adaptation to elevated CO 2e5
Qualifier
when upregulatede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plantago lanceolata
Plantago lanceolata · Taxonsannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using Plantago lanceolata L. seed collected from a naturally high CO 2 spring and adjacent ambient CO 2 control site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–384 · show in text ↑
e5

“We propose that the two positive regulators of stomatal number ( SCRM 2 ) and CDKB 1;1 when upregulated act as key controllers of stomatal adaptation to elevated CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1724–1890 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring plants showed significant transcriptome reprogramming of photosynthesis and dark respiration.

Taxon
Plantago lanceolata L.Plantago lanceolatae0
Material
spring plantse6
Outcome
transcriptome reprogramming of photosynthetic and dark respiratione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plantago lanceolata
Plantago lanceolata · Taxonsannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using Plantago lanceolata L. seed collected from a naturally high CO 2 spring and adjacent ambient CO 2 control site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–384 · show in text ↑
e6

“Combined with significant transcriptome reprogramming of photosynthetic and dark respiration and enhanced growth in spring plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1893–2022 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring plants showed enhanced growth.

Taxon
Plantago lanceolata L.Plantago lanceolatae0
Material
spring plantse6
Outcome
growthe6
Direction
enhancede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plantago lanceolata
Plantago lanceolata · Taxonsannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using Plantago lanceolata L. seed collected from a naturally high CO 2 spring and adjacent ambient CO 2 control site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–384 · show in text ↑
e6

“Combined with significant transcriptome reprogramming of photosynthetic and dark respiration and enhanced growth in spring plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1893–2022 · show in text ↑