Paper · 2016 · IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science

Effects of Various Pre-Sowing Treatments on Seed Germination of Carob (Ceratonia Siliqua L.) From Al-Jabal Al-Akhdar Area (Balagrae, Al-Baida, Libya)

Sabah H. Lamlom; Eman M. Abdalrasol

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study was conducted on a wild carob genotype grown in Al-Jabal Al-Akhdar area (Balagrae, Al-Baida, Libya). Seeds belonging to three individual trees chosen at random were collected. Seven different pre-sowing treatments (soaking in distilled water, boiling water 100C, soaking in sulphuric acid, mechanical scarification, mechanical scarification & soaking in distilled water, mechanical scarification & soaking in sulphuric acid and untreated seeds) were applied and examined for their effectiveness to stimulate carob seed germination. The results showed that mechanical scarification & soaking in distilled water treatment was the most effective method in increasing the germination percentage by (94.33%) compared to untreated seeds (5.99%). Mechanical scarification & soaking in distilled water treatment significantly decreased the mean germination time value (MGT) by (2.83 days). An MGT value was significantly higher in control treatment (23.22 days).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical scarification plus soaking in distilled water was the most effective pre-sowing treatment, increasing carob germination percentage to 94.33% versus 5.99% in untreated seeds.

Treatment
mechanical scarification & soaking in distilled water treatmente0
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
94.33%e0
Qualifier
5.99%e0
Comparator
untreated seedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ceratonia siliqua
Ceratonia siliqua · TaxonEduardo Milla · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mechanical scarification & soaking in distilled water treatment was the most effective method in increasing the germination percentage by (94.33%) compared to untreated seeds (5.99%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–749 · show in text ↑
t0

“Carob (Ceratonia Siliqua L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical scarification plus soaking in distilled water significantly decreased mean germination time (2.83 days) versus a significantly higher value in the control (23.22 days).

Treatment
Mechanical scarification & soaking in distilled water treatmente0
Outcome
mean germination time valuee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
2.83 dayse0
Qualifier
23.22 dayse0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ceratonia siliqua
Ceratonia siliqua · TaxonEduardo Milla · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mechanical scarification & soaking in distilled water treatment significantly decreased the mean germination time value (MGT) by (2.83 days). An MGT value was significantly higher in control treatment (23.22 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–964 · show in text ↑
t0

“Carob (Ceratonia Siliqua L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Ceratonia siliqua (carob)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Ceratonia siliqua (carob)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · growth · Ceratonia siliqua (carob)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.