Paper · 1999 · HortTechnology

Heat Treatment Affects Postharvest Quality of Kale and Collard, but not of Brussels Sprouts

Chien Y. Wang

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Mature leaves of kale ( Brassica oleracea L., Alboglabra group) and collard ( Brassica oleracea L., Acephala group), and Brussels sprouts ( Brassica oleracea L., Gemmifera group) were heated by moist air at 40, 45, 50, or 55 °C for durations of 0, 30, 60, or 90 minutes. Heating of kale at 45 °C for 30 minutes was effective in maintaining better postharvest quality, delaying yellowing, and reducing losses of sugars and organic acids during subsequent storage at 15 °C. Exposure of collard at 40 °C for 60 minutes also delayed yellowing and maintained turgidity of the leaves. Other treatments were either less beneficial, not effective, or caused injury. Heat injury occurred when temperature and duration exceeded the tolerance levels. In some cases, heat-injured tissues remained green but developed fungal infection. Heat treatments had no measurable effects on the rate of senescence or storage quality of Brussels sprouts.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heating kale at 45 °C for 30 minutes maintained better postharvest quality.

Treatment
Heating of kale at 45 °C for 30 minutese0
Outcome
postharvest qualitye0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heating of kale at 45 °C for 30 minutes was effective in maintaining better postharvest quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–366 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The kale heat treatment delayed yellowing.

Treatment
Heating of kale at 45 °C for 30 minutese0
Outcome
yellowinge0
Direction
delayinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heating of kale at 45 °C for 30 minutes was effective in maintaining better postharvest quality, delaying yellowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–386 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The kale heat treatment reduced sugar and organic acid losses during storage at 15 °C.

Treatment
Heating of kale at 45 °C for 30 minutese0
Outcome
losses of sugars and organic acidse0
Direction
reducinge0
Qualifier
during subsequent storage at 15 °Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heating of kale at 45 °C for 30 minutes was effective in maintaining better postharvest quality, delaying yellowing, and reducing losses of sugars and organic acids during subsequent storage at 15 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–470 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heating collard at 40 °C for 60 minutes delayed yellowing and maintained leaf turgidity.

Taxon
collarde0
Treatment
Exposure of collard at 40 °C for 60 minutese0
Outcome
yellowing and maintained turgidity of the leavese0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure of collard at 40 °C for 60 minutes also delayed yellowing and maintained turgidity of the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–577 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other heat treatments were less beneficial, ineffective or injurious.

Taxon
Kale and Collarde0t0
Treatment
Other treatmentse0t0
Outcome
less beneficial, not effective, or caused injurye0t0
Direction
less beneficiale0t0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Other treatments were either less beneficial, not effective, or caused injury”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–656 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kale and Collard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat injury occurred beyond tolerance levels of temperature and duration.

Taxon
Kale and Collarde0t0
Outcome
Heat injurye0t0
Qualifier
temperature and duration exceeded the tolerance levelse0t0

Verbatim

e0

“Heat injury occurred when temperature and duration exceeded the tolerance levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–738 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kale and Collard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some heat-injured tissues stayed green but developed fungal infection.

Taxon
Kale and Collarde0t0
Outcome
fungal infectione0t0
Qualifier
heat-injured tissues remained greene0t0

Verbatim

e0

“In some cases, heat-injured tissues remained green but developed fungal infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–821 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kale and Collard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat treatment did not measurably change Brussels sprouts senescence or storage quality.

Treatment
Heat treatmentse0
Outcome
rate of senescence or storage qualitye0
Direction
no measurable effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera
Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera · TaxonEric Hunt · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heat treatments had no measurable effects on the rate of senescence or storage quality of Brussels sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–929 · show in text ↑

Brassica oleracea var. viridis · disease · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

heat · quality: postharvest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

heat · quality: general · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

heat · molecular: metabolites · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

heat · disease · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.