Paper · 2016 · Journal of AgriSearch

Improving wheat and soil productivity through integrated nutrient management and efficient planting system

A. K. SINGH; H. B. Sharma; B. L. Meena; et al.

13
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to developed improved wheat and soil production system through integrated nutrient management (INM) and efficient planting system (EPS) in split plot design (SPD) with 20 treatment combinations. Treatments were consist of two planting systems (conventional and FIRB) and 10 fertility treatments viz., control, RDF, 75% RDF + FYM, 75% RDF + FYM + Zn, 75% RDF + FYM + Biofertilizer (BF) , 75% RDF + FYM + BF + Zn, RDF + FYM, RDF + FYM + Zn, RDF + FYM + BF and RDF + FYM + BF + Zn. The yield contributing characters of wheat viz., number of spikes / plant and number of grains/ spike were recorded significantly higher when the crop was supplied with combined application of RDF or 75% RDF along with FYM, biofertilizer and zinc over control and treatment receiving RDF only. In case of wheat yield, 10.8 and 11.3 per cent higher yield were registered with FIRB planting system over conventional system during 2007-08 and 2008-09. However in case of integrated nutrient management, RDF + FYM + BF + Zn treatment produced 50.39 and 52.73 q/ha wheat yield respectively. The grain and straw yields increased significantly with treatment RDF + FYM + Zn over control and RDF alone. The increase in grain yield with application of RDF + FYM + BF + Zn over RDF alone was 16.8 and 14.1 per cent during 2007-08 and 2008-09, respectively. The treatment receiving fertilizer showed a higher harvest index over unfertilized control. No significant difference between planting systems was recorded in respect of available nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and organic carbon status of soil after harvest of crop during both the years of investigation. However, a higher net positive NPK balance under FIRB planting was observed over conventional planting system. A lower bulk density in the surface soil was observed under FIRB planting system as compared to conventional planting system during both years of field study. The FIRB system of planting and combined application of RDF or 75% RDF along with FYM, biofertilizers and zinc not only gave higher productivity and profitability of wheat but also have positive effect on soil physico-chemical properties which resulted into better rhizospheroc environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined RDF or 75% RDF with manure, biofertilizer and zinc raised wheat spikes and grains per spike versus control and RDF alone.

Treatment
combined application of RDF or 75% RDF along with FYM, biofertilizer and zince0
Outcome
number of spikes / plant and number of grains/ spikee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control and treatment receiving RDF onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield contributing characters of wheat viz., number of spikes / plant and number of grains/ spike were recorded significantly higher when the crop was supplied with combined application of RDF or 75% RDF along with FYM, biofertilizer and zinc over control and treatment receiving RDF only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–805 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FIRB increased wheat yield 10.8% in 2007–08 versus conventional planting.

Treatment
FIRB planting systeme0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
10.8e0
Qualifier
2007-08e0
Comparator
conventional systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10.8 and 11.3 per cent higher yield were registered with FIRB planting system over conventional system during 2007-08 and 2008-09.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–960 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FIRB increased wheat yield 11.3% in 2008–09 versus conventional planting.

Treatment
FIRB planting systeme0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
11.3 per cente0
Qualifier
2008-09e0
Comparator
conventional systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10.8 and 11.3 per cent higher yield were registered with FIRB planting system over conventional system during 2007-08 and 2008-09.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–960 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF + FYM + BF + Zn yielded 50.39 q/ha wheat in the first year.

Treatment
RDF + FYM + BF + Zne0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Value
50.39e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RDF + FYM + BF + Zn treatment produced 50.39 and 52.73 q/ha wheat yield respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1097 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF + FYM + BF + Zn yielded 52.73 q/ha wheat in the second year.

Treatment
RDF + FYM + BF + Zne0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Value
52.73 q/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RDF + FYM + BF + Zn treatment produced 50.39 and 52.73 q/ha wheat yield respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1097 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF + FYM + Zn raised grain and straw yields versus control and RDF alone.

Treatment
RDF + FYM + Zne0
Outcome
grain and straw yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control and RDF alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain and straw yields increased significantly with treatment RDF + FYM + Zn over control and RDF alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1206 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF + FYM + BF + Zn increased grain yield 16.8% over RDF alone in 2007–08.

Treatment
RDF + FYM + BF + Zne0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
16.8e0
Qualifier
2007-08e0
Comparator
RDF alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in grain yield with application of RDF + FYM + BF + Zn over RDF alone was 16.8 and 14.1 per cent during 2007-08 and 2008-09, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1358 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF + FYM + BF + Zn increased grain yield 14.1% over RDF alone in 2008–09.

Treatment
RDF + FYM + BF + Zne0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
14.1 per cente0
Qualifier
2008-09e0
Comparator
RDF alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in grain yield with application of RDF + FYM + BF + Zn over RDF alone was 16.8 and 14.1 per cent during 2007-08 and 2008-09, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1358 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer treatments raised harvest index versus unfertilized control.

Treatment
fertilizere0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
unfertilized controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment receiving fertilizer showed a higher harvest index over unfertilized control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1450 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting system had no significant effect on postharvest available soil N, P, K or organic carbon.

Treatment
planting systemse0
Outcome
available nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and organic carbon status of soile0
Direction
No significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant difference between planting systems was recorded in respect of available nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and organic carbon status of soil after harvest of crop during both the years of investigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1666 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FIRB increased positive soil NPK balance versus conventional planting.

Treatment
FIRB plantinge0
Outcome
net positive NPK balancee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
conventional planting systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a higher net positive NPK balance under FIRB planting was observed over conventional planting system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1676–1777 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FIRB reduced surface soil bulk density versus conventional planting.

Treatment
FIRB planting systeme0
Outcome
bulk density in the surface soile0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
conventional planting systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A lower bulk density in the surface soil was observed under FIRB planting system as compared to conventional planting system during both years of field study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1778–1936 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors conclude FIRB with combined nutrient inputs improved wheat productivity, profitability and soil properties.

Outcome
FIRB system of planting and combined application of RDF or 75% RDF along with FYM, biofertilizers and zince0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The FIRB system of planting and combined application of RDF or 75% RDF along with FYM, biofertilizers and zinc not only gave higher productivity and profitability of wheat but also have positive effect on soil physico-chemical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1937–2174 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.