Paper · 2015 · Scientific Research and Essays

Front line demonstrations on need based plant protection in pulses for enhancing productivity and profitability under farmers condition

K Tripathi A; S Yadav K; P Srivastava V

16
claims
37
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Pulses have high nutritional value and worldwide commercial importance because these are rich source of protein and fibers. The productivity of pulses is lower in comparison to potential yield due to several biotic and abiotic stress. To show the productivity potential and profitability of need based plant protection in pulse crops (Black gram, Pigeonpea, Gram, pea and Lentil) total 74 front line demonstrations (FLDs) were conducted in 08 villages of Chhatarpur and Sagar districts of Madhya Pradesh under rain fed and partially irrigated condition. The pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera) population in Pigeonpea decreased by 56.6% with increase in seed yield (17.26%), net return Rs. 27430 and B:C ratio 5.03 with improved technology (IT) while larval population of pod borer in chick pea reduced by 80 per cent (from 1.5 to 0.3 per plant) with increase in yield of 28.1%. Yellow mosaic disease incidence in blackgram decreased significantly by application of Improved Technology by 61.5% (32.8 to 12.3%) which ultimately gave 50.7% higher grain yield. Seed treatment and soil application of Trichoderma viride decreased incidence of wilt disease by 68.6% in lentil and 68.1% in Gram, which also increased seed yield by 20.7 and 37.3% respectively. The management practice also gave net return of Rs. 15,230 and B:C ratio 3.37 in lentil crop and Rs. 25,650 net return and B:C ratio 4.0 in Gram as compared to FP plots (Rs. 11520 net profit and B:C ratio 3.08 for lentil and Rs. 17300 net profit and 3.27 B:C ratio for chickpea ). Key words: Pigeonpea, gram, blackgram, IPM, Trichoderma viride, demonstration.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With improved technology, the pod borer Helicoverpa armigera population in pigeonpea decreased by 56.6%.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
improved technology (IT)e2
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae1pest
Outcome
pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera) populatione1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
56.6%e1
Setting
Chhatarpur and Sagar districts of Madhya Pradeshe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were conducted in 08 villages of Chhatarpur and Sagar districts of Madhya Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–503 · show in text ↑
e1

“The pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera) population in Pigeonpea decreased by 56.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–633 · show in text ↑
e2

“with improved technology (IT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With improved technology, pigeonpea seed yield increased by 17.26%.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
improved technology (IT)e3
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae1pest
Outcome
seed yielde2
Direction
increasee2
Value
17.26%e2
Setting
Chhatarpur and Sagar districts of Madhya Pradeshe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were conducted in 08 villages of Chhatarpur and Sagar districts of Madhya Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–503 · show in text ↑
e1

“The pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera) population in Pigeonpea decreased by 56.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–633 · show in text ↑
e2

“with increase in seed yield (17.26%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–670 · show in text ↑
e3

“with improved technology (IT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–741 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea net return was Rs. 27430 with improved technology.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Outcome
net returne1
Value
Rs. 27430e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera) population in Pigeonpea decreased by 56.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–633 · show in text ↑
e1

“net return Rs. 27430 and B:C ratio 5.03 with improved technology (IT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–741 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea B:C ratio was 5.03 with improved technology.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Outcome
B:C ratioe1
Value
5.03e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera) population in Pigeonpea decreased by 56.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–633 · show in text ↑
e1

“net return Rs. 27430 and B:C ratio 5.03 with improved technology (IT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With improved technology, the pod borer larval population in chickpea was reduced by 80 per cent.

Taxon
chick peaCicer arietinume2
Treatment
improved technology (IT)e1
Interactor
pod borere2pest
Outcome
larval population of pod borere2
Direction
reducede2
Value
80 per cente2
Setting
Chhatarpur and Sagar districts of Madhya Pradeshe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were conducted in 08 villages of Chhatarpur and Sagar districts of Madhya Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–503 · show in text ↑
e1

“with improved technology (IT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–741 · show in text ↑
e2

“larval population of pod borer in chick pea reduced by 80 per cent (from 1.5 to 0.3 per plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–842 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With improved technology, chickpea yield increased by 28.1%.

Taxon
chick peaCicer arietinume2
Treatment
improved technology (IT)e1
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
increasee3
Value
28.1%e3
Setting
Chhatarpur and Sagar districts of Madhya Pradeshe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were conducted in 08 villages of Chhatarpur and Sagar districts of Madhya Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–503 · show in text ↑
e1

“with improved technology (IT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–741 · show in text ↑
e2

“larval population of pod borer in chick pea reduced by 80 per cent (from 1.5 to 0.3 per plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–842 · show in text ↑
e3

“with increase in yield of 28.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–874 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Improved Technology decreased yellow mosaic disease incidence in blackgram significantly by 61.5%.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungoe1
Treatment
Improved Technologye1
Outcome
Yellow mosaic disease incidencee1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
61.5%e1
Setting
Chhatarpur and Sagar districts of Madhya Pradeshe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were conducted in 08 villages of Chhatarpur and Sagar districts of Madhya Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–503 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yellow mosaic disease incidence in blackgram decreased significantly by application of Improved Technology by 61.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–991 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improved Technology gave 50.7% higher grain yield in blackgram.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungoe1
Treatment
Improved Technologye1
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
50.7%e2
Setting
Chhatarpur and Sagar districts of Madhya Pradeshe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were conducted in 08 villages of Chhatarpur and Sagar districts of Madhya Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–503 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yellow mosaic disease incidence in blackgram decreased significantly by application of Improved Technology by 61.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–991 · show in text ↑
e2

“which ultimately gave 50.7% higher grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma viride treatment decreased wilt incidence in lentil by 68.6%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
Seed treatment and soil application of Trichoderma viridee1
Interactor
Trichoderma virideTrichoderma viridee1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
incidence of wilt diseasee1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
68.6%e1
Setting
Chhatarpur and Sagar districts of Madhya Pradeshe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were conducted in 08 villages of Chhatarpur and Sagar districts of Madhya Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–503 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seed treatment and soil application of Trichoderma viride decreased incidence of wilt disease by 68.6% in lentil and 68.1% in Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma viride treatment decreased wilt incidence in gram by 68.1%.

Taxon
Grame1
Treatment
Seed treatment and soil application of Trichoderma viridee1
Interactor
Trichoderma virideTrichoderma viridee1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
incidence of wilt diseasee1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
68.1%e1
Setting
Chhatarpur and Sagar districts of Madhya Pradeshe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were conducted in 08 villages of Chhatarpur and Sagar districts of Madhya Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–503 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seed treatment and soil application of Trichoderma viride decreased incidence of wilt disease by 68.6% in lentil and 68.1% in Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma viride treatment increased lentil seed yield by 20.7%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
Seed treatment and soil application of Trichoderma viridee1
Interactor
Trichoderma virideTrichoderma viridee1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
seed yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
20.7e2
Setting
Chhatarpur and Sagar districts of Madhya Pradeshe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were conducted in 08 villages of Chhatarpur and Sagar districts of Madhya Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–503 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seed treatment and soil application of Trichoderma viride decreased incidence of wilt disease by 68.6% in lentil and 68.1% in Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1186 · show in text ↑
e2

“which also increased seed yield by 20.7 and 37.3% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1250 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma viride treatment increased gram seed yield by 37.3%.

Taxon
Grame1
Treatment
Seed treatment and soil application of Trichoderma viridee1
Interactor
Trichoderma virideTrichoderma viridee1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
seed yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
37.3e2
Setting
Chhatarpur and Sagar districts of Madhya Pradeshe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were conducted in 08 villages of Chhatarpur and Sagar districts of Madhya Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–503 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seed treatment and soil application of Trichoderma viride decreased incidence of wilt disease by 68.6% in lentil and 68.1% in Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1186 · show in text ↑
e2

“which also increased seed yield by 20.7 and 37.3% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1250 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lentil net return under the management practice was Rs. 15,230.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Outcome
net returne0
Value
Rs. 15,230e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gave net return of Rs. 15,230 and B:C ratio 3.37 in lentil crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1344 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lentil B:C ratio under the management practice was 3.37.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Value
3.37e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gave net return of Rs. 15,230 and B:C ratio 3.37 in lentil crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1344 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gram net return under the management practice was Rs. 25,650, compared with FP plots.

Taxon
Grame0
Outcome
net returne0
Value
Rs. 25,650e0
Comparator
FP plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“Rs. 25,650 net return and B:C ratio 4.0 in Gram as compared to FP plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1420 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gram B:C ratio under the management practice was 4.0, compared with FP plots.

Taxon
Grame0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Value
4.0e0
Comparator
FP plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“Rs. 25,650 net return and B:C ratio 4.0 in Gram as compared to FP plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1420 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma viride · disease · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Trichoderma viride · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 57 positive, 4 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

application · disease · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

seed treatment · disease · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.