Paper · 2016 · Journal of Plant Sciences

Growth and Ecophysiological Processes in Seedlings of Dipteryx odorata (Aubl.) Willd Submitted to Two Water Conditions

Bruno Moitinho Maltarolo; Ellen Gleyce da Silva Lima; Vitor Resende do Nascimento; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cumaru is a tree originally from the Amazon. The objective was to analyze the parameters of gas exchange, relative water content, growth and biomass production in leaves and roots of Cumaru plants (Dipteryx odorata) submitted to drought. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse at the Federal Rural University of Amazonia (UFRA), Belem-Para. The experimental design was completely randomized in split plot in time (four times evaluation and two water conditions: control and drought), with 5 repetitions, totaling 40 experimental units. Were applied Analysis of variance, standard deviations, statistical analyzes and the means were compared by Tukey test at 5% significance. Drought caused reduced in diameter, leaf biomass, transpiration, RWC at 7th day of treatment and increased stomatal resistance. The cumaru was not effective in retaining water in the system. The stomatal closure mechanism secured decreased transpiration in the plant loses less water, entertaining this mechanism also affect plant growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced diameter in Dipteryx odorata at day 7.

Taxon
Dipteryx odorataDipteryx odoratat0
Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
diametere0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
7th day of treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dipteryx odorata
Dipteryx odorata · Taxonvincentvosriberalta · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Dipteryx odorata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought caused reduced in diameter, leaf biomass, transpiration, RWC at 7th day of treatment and increased stomatal resistance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced leaf biomass in Dipteryx odorata at day 7.

Taxon
Dipteryx odorataDipteryx odoratat0
Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
leaf biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
7th day of treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dipteryx odorata
Dipteryx odorata · Taxonvincentvosriberalta · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Dipteryx odorata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought caused reduced in diameter, leaf biomass, transpiration, RWC at 7th day of treatment and increased stomatal resistance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced transpiration in Dipteryx odorata at day 7.

Taxon
Dipteryx odorataDipteryx odoratat0
Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
transpiratione0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
7th day of treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dipteryx odorata
Dipteryx odorata · Taxonvincentvosriberalta · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Dipteryx odorata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought caused reduced in diameter, leaf biomass, transpiration, RWC at 7th day of treatment and increased stomatal resistance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced RWC in Dipteryx odorata at day 7.

Taxon
Dipteryx odorataDipteryx odoratat0
Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
RWCe0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
7th day of treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dipteryx odorata
Dipteryx odorata · Taxonvincentvosriberalta · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Dipteryx odorata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought caused reduced in diameter, leaf biomass, transpiration, RWC at 7th day of treatment and increased stomatal resistance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased stomatal resistance in Dipteryx odorata.

Taxon
Dipteryx odorataDipteryx odoratat0
Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
stomatal resistancee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dipteryx odorata
Dipteryx odorata · Taxonvincentvosriberalta · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Dipteryx odorata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought caused reduced in diameter, leaf biomass, transpiration, RWC at 7th day of treatment and increased stomatal resistance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–808 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cumaru did not retain water effectively under drought.

Outcome
retaining watere1
Direction
not effectivee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dipteryx odorata
Dipteryx odorata · Taxonvincentvosriberalta · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The cumaru was not effective in retaining water in the system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–871 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal closure was interpreted as reducing transpiration and water loss.

Taxon
Dipteryx odorataDipteryx odoratat0
Outcome
decreased transpiratione2
Direction
decreasede2
Qualifier
stomatal closure mechanisme2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dipteryx odorata
Dipteryx odorata · Taxonvincentvosriberalta · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Dipteryx odorata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–70 · show in text ↑
e2

“The stomatal closure mechanism secured decreased transpiration in the plant loses less water, entertaining this mechanism also affect plant growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1019 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal closure also affected plant growth.

Taxon
Dipteryx odorataDipteryx odoratat0
Outcome
plant growthe2
Qualifier
stomatal closure mechanisme2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dipteryx odorata
Dipteryx odorata · Taxonvincentvosriberalta · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Dipteryx odorata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–70 · show in text ↑
e2

“The stomatal closure mechanism secured decreased transpiration in the plant loses less water, entertaining this mechanism also affect plant growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1019 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: water · Dipteryx odorata (cumaru)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.