Paper · 2000 · HortScience

125 Effect of Postharvest Curing on Respiration and Quality in Garlic Bulbs During Cold Storage

Y.J. Yang; K.A. Lee

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Garlic ( Allium stivum L. cv. `Seosan') grown in Kyungbuk, Korea were harvested on June 1999 and dried in the field for 2 to 3 days. Bulbs were selected for uniformity in size and maturity and divided into two groups. One group was further dried in the shade at 25 °C for curing before storage at 0 °C. The other group was stored at 0 °C immediately without additional drying. Respiration of garlic bulbs dried additionally for 3 months was low, ranging from 1.5 to 3.0 CO 2 mL/kg per h for 95 days in storage; ethylene was not detected until 60 days in storage. Non-curing samples showed rapid increase of carbon dioxide production after 50 days of storage, this might be related to incidence of fungal decay. Ethylene showed maximum value at 45 days in storage, thereafter remained level of 5.6-6.3 μL/kg per h. All treatments did not show sprouting during storage period, but incidence of decay was significantly reduced by additional drying. The beneficial effect of curing for 3 months at 25 °C was maintenance of low water content in garlic bulbs, which resulted in reduction of decay.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Respiration of additionally dried garlic bulbs was low, 1.5 to 3.0 CO2 mL/kg per h over 95 days in storage.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Organ / stage
bulbse1
Treatment
dried additionally for 3 monthse1
Outcome
Respiratione1
Value
1.5 to 3.0 CO 2 mL/kg per he1
Qualifier
for 95 days in storagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Garlic Bulbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“Respiration of garlic bulbs dried additionally for 3 months was low, ranging from 1.5 to 3.0 CO 2 mL/kg per h for 95 days in storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–509 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-curing garlic bulbs showed a rapid increase of carbon dioxide production after 50 days of storage.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
Non-curinge2
Outcome
carbon dioxide productione2
Direction
increasee2
Qualifier
after 50 days of storagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Garlic Bulbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
e2

“Non-curing samples showed rapid increase of carbon dioxide production after 50 days of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–657 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethylene reached its maximum value at 45 days in storage.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Outcome
Ethylenee3
Qualifier
maximum value at 45 days in storagee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Garlic Bulbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
e3

“Ethylene showed maximum value at 45 days in storage, thereafter remained level of 5.6-6.3 μL/kg per h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–812 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethylene was not detected in garlic bulbs until 60 days in storage.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Outcome
ethylenee4
Qualifier
not detected until 60 days in storagee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Garlic Bulbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
e4

“ethylene was not detected until 60 days in storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–561 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After its maximum at 45 days, ethylene remained at 5.6-6.3 μL/kg per h in garlic bulbs.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Outcome
Ethylenee3
Value
5.6-6.3 μL/kg per he3
Qualifier
thereafter remained levele3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Garlic Bulbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
e3

“Ethylene showed maximum value at 45 days in storage, thereafter remained level of 5.6-6.3 μL/kg per h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–812 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No garlic bulbs in any treatment showed sprouting during storage.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Outcome
sproutinge5
Qualifier
during storage periode5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Garlic Bulbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
e5

“All treatments did not show sprouting during storage period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–873 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional drying significantly reduced the incidence of decay of garlic bulbs compared with storage without additional drying.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
additional dryinge6
Outcome
incidence of decaye6
Direction
reducede6
Comparator
without additional dryinge7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Garlic Bulbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
e6

“incidence of decay was significantly reduced by additional drying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–944 · show in text ↑
e7

“The other group was stored at 0 °C immediately without additional drying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–375 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Curing for 3 months at 25 °C maintained low water content in garlic bulbs, which the authors state resulted in reduced decay.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
curing for 3 months at 25 °Ce7
Outcome
reduction of decaye7
Qualifier
maintenance of low water contente7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Garlic Bulbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
e7

“The beneficial effect of curing for 3 months at 25 °C was maintenance of low water content in garlic bulbs, which resulted in reduction of decay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1090 · show in text ↑

processing · disease · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.