Abstract
Experimental studies have shown that AEW (Acidic Electrolyzed Water) plays a strong role in killing grape virus, and it has instantaneous, broad-spectrum, efficient, safe and non-residual fungicidal properties. The results show that spraying AEW, and spraying alkaline electrolyzed water first and then AEW, can play a good role in controlling the virus damage of grape downy mildew, Botrytis cinerea, anthracnose, grape Alternaria spot, and anthrachose of grape, with foliar control effect of 93.5%, 96.2%, 93.20%, 100% and 87.9%, respectively, and ear control effect of 88%, 92% , 84%, 84% and 72%, respectively. AEW can replace pesticide, and can promote the average grape weight and sugar degree.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
AEW killed grape virus and had fungicidal properties.
- Taxon
- grapee0
- Treatment
- AEW (Acidic Electrolyzed Water)e0
- Interactor
- grape viruse0pathogen
- Outcome
- killing grape viruse0
- Direction
- killinge0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“AEW (Acidic Electrolyzed Water) plays a strong role in killing grape virus, and it has instantaneous, broad-spectrum, efficient, safe and non-residual fungicidal properties”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar control effect for grape downy mildew was 93.5%.
- Taxon
- grapee0
- Organ / stage
- foliare0
- Treatment
- spraying AEWe1
- Interactor
- grape downy mildewe0pathogen
- Outcome
- grape downy mildewe0
- Direction
- control effecte0
- Value
- 93.5%e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“grape downy mildew, Botrytis cinerea, anthracnose, grape Alternaria spot, and anthrachose of grape, with foliar control effect of 93.5%, 96.2%, 93.20%, 100% and 87.9%”
e1“spraying AEW, and spraying alkaline electrolyzed water first and then AEW”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar control effect for Botrytis cinerea was 96.2%.
- Taxon
- grapee0
- Organ / stage
- foliare0
- Treatment
- spraying AEWe1
- Interactor
- Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinereae0pathogen - Outcome
- Botrytis cinereae0
- Direction
- control effecte0
- Value
- 96.2%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“grape downy mildew, Botrytis cinerea, anthracnose, grape Alternaria spot, and anthrachose of grape, with foliar control effect of 93.5%, 96.2%, 93.20%, 100% and 87.9%”
e1“spraying AEW, and spraying alkaline electrolyzed water first and then AEW”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar control effect for anthracnose was 93.20%.
- Taxon
- grapee0
- Organ / stage
- foliare0
- Treatment
- spraying AEWe1
- Interactor
- anthracnosee0pathogen
- Outcome
- anthracnosee0
- Direction
- control effecte0
- Value
- 93.20%e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“grape downy mildew, Botrytis cinerea, anthracnose, grape Alternaria spot, and anthrachose of grape, with foliar control effect of 93.5%, 96.2%, 93.20%, 100% and 87.9%”
e1“spraying AEW, and spraying alkaline electrolyzed water first and then AEW”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar control effect for grape Alternaria spot was 100%.
- Taxon
- grapee0
- Organ / stage
- foliare0
- Treatment
- spraying AEWe1
- Interactor
- grape Alternaria spote0pathogen
- Outcome
- grape Alternaria spote0
- Direction
- control effecte0
- Value
- 100%e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“grape downy mildew, Botrytis cinerea, anthracnose, grape Alternaria spot, and anthrachose of grape, with foliar control effect of 93.5%, 96.2%, 93.20%, 100% and 87.9%”
e1“spraying AEW, and spraying alkaline electrolyzed water first and then AEW”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar control effect for anthrachose of grape was 87.9%.
- Taxon
- grapee0
- Organ / stage
- foliare0
- Treatment
- spraying AEWe1
- Interactor
- anthrachose of grapee0pathogen
- Outcome
- anthrachose of grapee0
- Direction
- control effecte0
- Value
- 87.9%e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“grape downy mildew, Botrytis cinerea, anthracnose, grape Alternaria spot, and anthrachose of grape, with foliar control effect of 93.5%, 96.2%, 93.20%, 100% and 87.9%”
e1“spraying AEW, and spraying alkaline electrolyzed water first and then AEW”
Claim · model-written summary
Ear control effect for grape downy mildew was 88%.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“ear control effect of 88%, 92% , 84%, 84% and 72%, respectively”
e1“AEW (Acidic Electrolyzed Water) plays a strong role in killing grape virus”
e2“spraying AEW, and spraying alkaline electrolyzed water first and then AEW”
e3“grape downy mildew, Botrytis cinerea, anthracnose, grape Alternaria spot, and anthrachose of grape”
Claim · model-written summary
Ear control effect for Botrytis cinerea was 92%.
- Taxon
- grapee1
- Treatment
- spraying AEWe2
- Interactor
- Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae3pathogene0
- Outcome
- ear control effecte0
- Direction
- control effecte0
- Value
- 92%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“ear control effect of 88%, 92% , 84%, 84% and 72%, respectively”
e1“AEW (Acidic Electrolyzed Water) plays a strong role in killing grape virus”
e2“spraying AEW, and spraying alkaline electrolyzed water first and then AEW”
e3“grape downy mildew, Botrytis cinerea, anthracnose, grape Alternaria spot, and anthrachose of grape”
Claim · model-written summary
Ear control effect for anthracnose was 84%.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“ear control effect of 88%, 92% , 84%, 84% and 72%, respectively”
e1“AEW (Acidic Electrolyzed Water) plays a strong role in killing grape virus”
e2“spraying AEW, and spraying alkaline electrolyzed water first and then AEW”
e3“grape downy mildew, Botrytis cinerea, anthracnose, grape Alternaria spot, and anthrachose of grape”
Claim · model-written summary
Ear control effect for grape Alternaria spot was 84%.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“ear control effect of 88%, 92% , 84%, 84% and 72%, respectively”
e1“AEW (Acidic Electrolyzed Water) plays a strong role in killing grape virus”
e2“spraying AEW, and spraying alkaline electrolyzed water first and then AEW”
e3“grape downy mildew, Botrytis cinerea, anthracnose, grape Alternaria spot, and anthrachose of grape”
Claim · model-written summary
Ear control effect for anthrachose of grape was 72%.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“ear control effect of 88%, 92% , 84%, 84% and 72%, respectively”
e1“AEW (Acidic Electrolyzed Water) plays a strong role in killing grape virus”
e2“spraying AEW, and spraying alkaline electrolyzed water first and then AEW”
e3“grape downy mildew, Botrytis cinerea, anthracnose, grape Alternaria spot, and anthrachose of grape”
Claim · model-written summary
AEW promoted average grape weight.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“AEW can replace pesticide, and can promote the average grape weight and sugar degree”
Claim · model-written summary
AEW promoted grape sugar degree.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“AEW can replace pesticide, and can promote the average grape weight and sugar degree”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest AEW can replace pesticide.
Verbatim
e0“AEW can replace pesticide”
e1“AEW (Acidic Electrolyzed Water) plays a strong role in killing grape virus”
The same questions in other papers
application · Botrytis cinerea · VitisPositive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →application · control · VitisPositive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →application · disease · VitisPositive and negative results
49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
52 papers more in this group
See all 56 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.