Paper · 1970 · Fiziologiya Rastenii

The Influence of red and blue light on the rate of photosynthesis and the CO2 compensation point at various oxygen concentrations.

N. P. Voskresenskaya

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Apparent photosynthesis of attached leaves of Phaseolzzs vulgaris, Vicia faba, Pisum sativum, and Nicotiana tabacum at various intensities of blue and red light was measured by infrared C02 gas analyzer in a closed system. Si~nultaneously the COz compensation point was measured. It was found that light-limited photosynthetic rate in blue light was equal to or more than that in red light. Inhibition of photosynthesis, which sometimes occurred at light-saturated intensities of blue light, could be avoided by addition of red light, prolonged exposure of the plants to blue light, or by lowering the Oz concentration. Accordi~lgly, the increase of photosynthetic rate due to change of Oz concentration from 21 to 3% O2 is higher in blue light only when photosynthesis is inhibited by blue light at 217, 02 . The data on the action of blue and red light on the CO2 co~npensation point seems to exclude the activation of photorespiration by blue light. The possible effects of blue light on apparent photosynthesis are discussed on the basis of the results presented.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light-limited photosynthesis in blue light equalled or exceeded that under red light.

Taxon
Phaseolzzs vulgarist0
Treatment
blue lighte0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
equal to or more thane0
Qualifier
light-limitede0
Comparator
red lighte0

Verbatim

e0

“light-limited photosynthetic rate in blue light was equal to or more than that in red light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–389 · show in text ↑
t0

“attached leaves of Phaseolzzs vulgaris, Vicia faba, Pisum sativum, and Nicotiana tabacum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding red light could avoid inhibition caused by saturating blue light.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabat0
Treatment
addition of red lighte0
Outcome
Inhibition of photosynthesise0
Direction
avoidede0
Comparator
blue lighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inhibition of photosynthesis, which sometimes occurred at light-saturated intensities of blue light, could be avoided by addition of red light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–533 · show in text ↑
t0

“attached leaves of Phaseolzzs vulgaris, Vicia faba, Pisum sativum, and Nicotiana tabacum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prolonged blue-light exposure could avoid inhibition at saturating blue light.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
prolonged exposure of the plants to blue lighte0
Outcome
Inhibition of photosynthesise0
Direction
avoidede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inhibition of photosynthesis, which sometimes occurred at light-saturated intensities of blue light, could be avoided by addition of red light, prolonged exposure of the plants to blue light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–581 · show in text ↑
t0

“attached leaves of Phaseolzzs vulgaris, Vicia faba, Pisum sativum, and Nicotiana tabacum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lowering oxygen concentration could avoid blue-light inhibition of photosynthesis.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacumNicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
lowering the Oz concentratione0
Outcome
Inhibition of photosynthesise0
Direction
avoidede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inhibition of photosynthesis, which sometimes occurred at light-saturated intensities of blue light, could be avoided by addition of red light, prolonged exposure of the plants to blue light, or by lowering the Oz concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–618 · show in text ↑
t0

“attached leaves of Phaseolzzs vulgaris, Vicia faba, Pisum sativum, and Nicotiana tabacum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A shift from 21 to 3% O2 increased photosynthetic rate more in blue light only when blue light inhibited photosynthesis at 21% oxygen.

Taxon
Phaseolzzs vulgarist0
Treatment
change of Oz concentration from 21 to 3% O2e0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
only when photosynthesis is inhibited by blue lighte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the increase of photosynthetic rate due to change of Oz concentration from 21 to 3% O2 is higher in blue light only when photosynthesis is inhibited by blue light at 217, 02”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–807 · show in text ↑
t0

“attached leaves of Phaseolzzs vulgaris, Vicia faba, Pisum sativum, and Nicotiana tabacum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–115 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The light responses of the CO2 compensation point seemed to exclude activation of photorespiration by blue light.

Taxon
Phaseolzzs vulgarist0
Treatment
blue lighte0
Outcome
activation of photorespiratione0
Qualifier
seems to excludee0

Verbatim

e0

“The data on the action of blue and red light on the CO2 co~npensation point seems to exclude the activation of photorespiration by blue light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“attached leaves of Phaseolzzs vulgaris, Vicia faba, Pisum sativum, and Nicotiana tabacum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–115 · show in text ↑

light · physiology: photosynthesis · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

light · physiology: photosynthesis · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 10 positive, 14 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.