Paper · 2008 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

An evaluation of yield in "intercropping of maize and potato"

K H Jamshidi; D Mazaheri; Jalal Saba

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract To find out how maize and potato can grow and develop in an intercropping system rather than each grown alone in a sole cropping system the following factorial experiment was performend in the frame-work of a randomized complete block three replications in the experimental farm of the faculty of agriculture, Zanjan University in year 2004. Different potato to maize ratios of (1:0), i.e. sole potato;(3:1) meaning 75% potato plus 25% maize; (1:1), that is half and half of each crop; 25 percent potato together with maize of 75% (1:3); and finally sole cropping of maize (0:1) were employed. Two plant population treatments of 3.8 and 5.3 plants/ m2 were assigned to each crop. There was an increase observed in the radiation absorption and in Leaf Area Index (LAI) with an increase in plant density from 3.8 to 5.3 plant per square meter. Maximum potato yield (20390 kg/ha) was obtained from 3:1 crop ratio and maximum yield of maize (8898 kg/ha) from the 1:1 ratio of intercropping system. In the case of potato the new cropping system (intercropping) there were significant (? = 0.05) observed in yield, mean number of branches per plant, as well as in mean weight of potato tubers. In maize, the cropping system revealed a significant effect on yield, mean number of ears per plant as well as on mean number of seeds per year. Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) was shown to be more than one for all the treatments indicating more profitability and superiority of intercropping to sole cropping system. The highest LER for either one of the crops in intercropping system was 1.58. This was obtained for potato in the 3:1 ratio treatment while for maize it was obtained for the treatment of 1:1 ratio. Key Words: Sole cropping; Intercropping; Land Equivalent Ratio (LER); Dominance; Substitution

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher density increased radiation absorption.

Taxon
maize and potatoSolanum tuberosumZea mayst0
Treatment
increase in plant density from 3.8 to 5.3 plant per square metere0
Outcome
radiation absorptione0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
3.8e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was an increase observed in the radiation absorption and in Leaf Area Index (LAI) with an increase in plant density from 3.8 to 5.3 plant per square meter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher density increased leaf area index.

Taxon
maize and potatoSolanum tuberosumZea mayst0
Treatment
increase in plant density from 3.8 to 5.3 plant per square metere0
Outcome
Leaf Area Index (LAI)e0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
3.8e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was an increase observed in the radiation absorption and in Leaf Area Index (LAI) with an increase in plant density from 3.8 to 5.3 plant per square meter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato yield reached a maximum of 20390 kg/ha at the 3:1 crop ratio.

Treatment
3:1 crop ratioe0
Outcome
potato yielde0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
20390 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum potato yield (20390 kg/ha) was obtained from 3:1 crop ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–918 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield reached a maximum of 8898 kg/ha at the 1:1 intercrop ratio.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
1:1 ratio of intercropping systeme0
Outcome
yield of maizee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
8898 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum yield of maize (8898 kg/ha) from the 1:1 ratio of intercropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cropping system had a significant effect on potato yield, branch number and tuber weight.

Treatment
intercroppinge1
Outcome
yield, mean number of branches per plant, as well as in mean weight of potato tuberse0
Value
? = 0.05e0
Comparator
sole croppinge2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant (? = 0.05) observed in yield, mean number of branches per plant, as well as in mean weight of potato tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1195 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum yield of maize (8898 kg/ha) from the 1:1 ratio of intercropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1001 · show in text ↑
e2

“rather than each grown alone in a sole cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cropping system significantly affected maize yield, ears per plant and seeds per year.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
cropping systeme0
Outcome
yield, mean number of ears per plant as well as on mean number of seeds per yeare0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cropping system revealed a significant effect on yield, mean number of ears per plant as well as on mean number of seeds per year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1340 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All intercropping treatments had land equivalent ratio above one.

Taxon
maize and potatoSolanum tuberosumZea mayst0
Outcome
Land Equivalent Ratio (LER)e0
Direction
more than onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) was shown to be more than one for all the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1422 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest potato land equivalent ratio was 1.58 at the 3:1 ratio.

Treatment
3:1 ratio treatmente0
Outcome
LERe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.58e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest LER for either one of the crops in intercropping system was 1.58. This was obtained for potato in the 3:1 ratio treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1644 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest maize land equivalent ratio was 1.58 at the 1:1 ratio.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
1:1 ratioe0
Outcome
LERe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.58e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest LER for either one of the crops in intercropping system was 1.58. This was obtained for potato in the 3:1 ratio treatment while for maize it was obtained for the treatment of 1:1 ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1708 · show in text ↑

density · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

density · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 34 positive, 10 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

density · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

197 papers: 119 positive, 78 negative or no effect

118 papers in the same direction as this paper · 76 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

193 papers more in this group

See all 197 papers →

density · nutrient: content · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.