Abstract
Rice is one of the staple crops in Burkina Faso. However, the local production covers only 47% of the population demands. One of the main reasons of the poor productivity in Burkina Faso is iron toxicity which is related mainly to the activity of Iron Reducing Bacteria in the rice field’s ecosystems. In order to control the harmful effects of Iron Reducing Bacterial populations and to improve rice productivity, a pots experiment was conducted at the experimental site of the University Ouaga I Pr. Joseph KI-ZERBO. An iron toxic soil from Kou Valley (West of Burkina Faso) and two rice varieties, BOUAKE-189 and ROK-5, sensitive and tolerant to iron toxicity, respectively, were used for the experiment. The pots were drained for 14 days (D2) and amended with chemical fertilizers (NPK + Urea and NPK + Urea + Ca + Mg + Zn complexes). Control pots without drainage and fertilization (D0/NF) were prepared similarly. The kinetics of Iron Reducing Bacterial populations and ferrous iron content in soil near rice roots were monitored throughout the cultural cycle using MPN and colorimetric methods, respectively. The total iron content was evaluated in rice plant using a spectrometric method. Data obtained were analyzed in relation to drainage and fertilization mode, rice growth stage and rice yield using the Student’s t-test and XLSTAT 2014 statistical software. The experiment showed that the combined application of subsurface drainage and NPK + Urea + Ca + Mg + Zn fertilization, reduced significantly the number of IRB in the soil near rice roots for both rice varieties (p = 0.050 and p = 0.020) increased the leaf tissue tolerance to excess amounts of Fe, and rice yield.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Combined subsurface drainage and NPK + Urea + Ca + Mg + Zn fertilization significantly reduced the number of iron-reducing bacteria in soil near the roots of both rice varieties.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae1
- Treatment
- combined application of subsurface drainage and NPK + Urea + Ca + Mg + Zn fertilizatione6
- Interactor
- Iron Reducing Bacteriae7other
- Outcome
- number of IRB in the soil near rice rootse1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Qualifier
- p = 0.050 and p = 0.020e1
- Comparator
- Control pots without drainage and fertilizatione5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“reduced significantly the number of IRB in the soil near rice roots for both rice varieties (p = 0.050 and p = 0.020)”
e6“the combined application of subsurface drainage and NPK + Urea + Ca + Mg + Zn fertilization”
e5“Control pots without drainage and fertilization (D0/NF) were prepared similarly”
e7“related mainly to the activity of Iron Reducing Bacteria”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined drainage and fertilization increased leaf tissue tolerance of rice to excess Fe.
- Taxon
- Rice
Oryza sativae4
- Treatment
- combined application of subsurface drainage and NPK + Urea + Ca + Mg + Zn fertilizatione6
- Outcome
- leaf tissue tolerance to excess amounts of Fee2
- Direction
- increasede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Rice is one of the staple crops in Burkina Faso”
e6“the combined application of subsurface drainage and NPK + Urea + Ca + Mg + Zn fertilization”
e2“increased the leaf tissue tolerance to excess amounts of Fe”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined drainage and fertilization increased rice yield.
- Taxon
- Rice
Oryza sativae4
- Treatment
- combined application of subsurface drainage and NPK + Urea + Ca + Mg + Zn fertilizatione6
- Outcome
- rice yielde3
- Direction
- increasede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Rice is one of the staple crops in Burkina Faso”
e6“the combined application of subsurface drainage and NPK + Urea + Ca + Mg + Zn fertilization”
e3“increased the leaf tissue tolerance to excess amounts of Fe, and rice yield”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →magnesium atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ
38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
39 papers more in this group
See all 43 papers →zinc atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ
388 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
415 papers more in this group
See all 419 papers →calcium atom · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
calcium atom · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
magnesium atom · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →zinc atom · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →calcium atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
25 papers more in this group
See all 29 papers →8 of 15 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.