Paper · 2016 · Agricultural Sciences

Effect of Combined Application of Subsurface Drainage and Mineral Fertilization on Iron-Reducing Bacterial Populations’ Developments and Fe2+ Uptake by Two Rice Varieties in an Iron Toxic Paddy Soil of Burkina Faso (West Africa)

Cécile Harmonie Otoidobiga; Honoré Kam; Adama Bagayogo; et al.

3
claims
10
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Rice is one of the staple crops in Burkina Faso. However, the local production covers only 47% of the population demands. One of the main reasons of the poor productivity in Burkina Faso is iron toxicity which is related mainly to the activity of Iron Reducing Bacteria in the rice field’s ecosystems. In order to control the harmful effects of Iron Reducing Bacterial populations and to improve rice productivity, a pots experiment was conducted at the experimental site of the University Ouaga I Pr. Joseph KI-ZERBO. An iron toxic soil from Kou Valley (West of Burkina Faso) and two rice varieties, BOUAKE-189 and ROK-5, sensitive and tolerant to iron toxicity, respectively, were used for the experiment. The pots were drained for 14 days (D2) and amended with chemical fertilizers (NPK + Urea and NPK + Urea + Ca + Mg + Zn complexes). Control pots without drainage and fertilization (D0/NF) were prepared similarly. The kinetics of Iron Reducing Bacterial populations and ferrous iron content in soil near rice roots were monitored throughout the cultural cycle using MPN and colorimetric methods, respectively. The total iron content was evaluated in rice plant using a spectrometric method. Data obtained were analyzed in relation to drainage and fertilization mode, rice growth stage and rice yield using the Student’s t-test and XLSTAT 2014 statistical software. The experiment showed that the combined application of subsurface drainage and NPK + Urea + Ca + Mg + Zn fertilization, reduced significantly the number of IRB in the soil near rice roots for both rice varieties (p = 0.050 and p = 0.020) increased the leaf tissue tolerance to excess amounts of Fe, and rice yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined subsurface drainage and NPK + Urea + Ca + Mg + Zn fertilization significantly reduced the number of iron-reducing bacteria in soil near the roots of both rice varieties.

Treatment
combined application of subsurface drainage and NPK + Urea + Ca + Mg + Zn fertilizatione6
Interactor
Iron Reducing Bacteriae7other
Outcome
number of IRB in the soil near rice rootse1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
p = 0.050 and p = 0.020e1
Comparator
Control pots without drainage and fertilizatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“reduced significantly the number of IRB in the soil near rice roots for both rice varieties (p = 0.050 and p = 0.020)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1491–1608 · show in text ↑
e6

“the combined application of subsurface drainage and NPK + Urea + Ca + Mg + Zn fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1489 · show in text ↑
e5

“Control pots without drainage and fertilization (D0/NF) were prepared similarly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–918 · show in text ↑
e7

“related mainly to the activity of Iron Reducing Bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–269 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined drainage and fertilization increased leaf tissue tolerance of rice to excess Fe.

Treatment
combined application of subsurface drainage and NPK + Urea + Ca + Mg + Zn fertilizatione6
Outcome
leaf tissue tolerance to excess amounts of Fee2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Rice is one of the staple crops in Burkina Faso”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–47 · show in text ↑
e6

“the combined application of subsurface drainage and NPK + Urea + Ca + Mg + Zn fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1489 · show in text ↑
e2

“increased the leaf tissue tolerance to excess amounts of Fe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1668 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined drainage and fertilization increased rice yield.

Treatment
combined application of subsurface drainage and NPK + Urea + Ca + Mg + Zn fertilizatione6
Outcome
rice yielde3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Rice is one of the staple crops in Burkina Faso”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–47 · show in text ↑
e6

“the combined application of subsurface drainage and NPK + Urea + Ca + Mg + Zn fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1489 · show in text ↑
e3

“increased the leaf tissue tolerance to excess amounts of Fe, and rice yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1684 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

magnesium atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

43 papers: 39 positive, 4 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

419 papers: 389 positive, 30 negative or no effect

388 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

415 papers more in this group

See all 419 papers →

calcium atom · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

calcium atom · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

magnesium atom · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

zinc atom · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 21 positive, 3 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

calcium atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 27 positive, 2 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

8 of 15 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.