Paper · 2014 · HortScience

Stomatal Development and Associated Photosynthetic Characteristics of Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) Plug Seedlings during Light Storage

Qingqing Duan; Ye Lin; Wu Jiang; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Illumination during storage was proven to extend the storability of seedlings, but little attention has been given to the underlying mechanism. To determine how light conditions affect photosynthetic status in watermelon [ Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. and Nakai] plug seedlings, differences of stomatal development and relative photosynthetic characteristics of expanding new leaves when stored for 8 days at 15 °C in light at a photosynthetic photon flux ( PPF ) of 15 μmol·m −2 ·s −1 or darkness were investigated. The stomatal density (SD) increased with time to a peak and then decreased from the start of storage in light to the subsequent transplantation. Dark storage retarded the stomatal development and delayed the appearance of the peak of SD. Compared with those under dark storage, light-stored seedlings showed significantly higher SD and stomatal index (SI) in leaves accompanied by higher maximal photochemical efficiency of PSII (F v /F m ) and quantum yield of PSII (ΦPSII). During storage in darkness, F v /F m and ΦPSII declined steeply with increasing storage duration but recovered gradually to reach the same level of those in light at the fourth day after transplanting. Seedlings stored in light for 8 days showed higher net photosynthesis rate (Pn), stomatal conductance ( g S ), intercellular CO 2 concentration (Ci), and transpiration rate (Tr) than in darkness. The post-storage recovery of Pn, g S , and Tr were closely related to the SI, which ensured the fast recovery of photosynthesis during the early stage of transplanting. In agreement with the change of SD, no differences in Pn, g S , Ci, and Tr between light and dark storage were observed after 8 days of transplantation. Seedlings stored in light appeared vigorous and the shoot dry weight was significantly higher than that of dark-stored ones. Although seedlings in dark storage had a poor appearance during storage, they showed inhibited regrowth potentials during the subsequent transplanting stage. This study exhibited that light in short-term storage contributed to maintaining stomatal development as well as photosynthetic efficiency in watermelon, which could also extend to post-storage for ensuring the transplant quality of seedlings after removal from storage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal density rose to a peak and then declined from light storage through transplanting.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
storage in lighte0
Outcome
stomatal density (SD)e0
Direction
increased with time to a peak and then decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The stomatal density (SD) increased with time to a peak and then decreased from the start of storage in light to the subsequent transplantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–666 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dark storage delayed stomatal development and its density peak.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Dark storagee0
Outcome
stomatal developmente0
Direction
retardede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dark storage retarded the stomatal development and delayed the appearance of the peak of SD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–759 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Light stored seedlings had significantly higher stomatal density and index than dark stored seedlings.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
light-stored seedlingse0
Outcome
SD and stomatal index (SI)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
dark storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with those under dark storage, light-stored seedlings showed significantly higher SD and stomatal index (SI) in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–888 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light stored seedlings had higher PSII maximal efficiency and quantum yield than dark stored seedlings.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
light-stored seedlingse0
Outcome
maximal photochemical efficiency of PSII (F v /F m ) and quantum yield of PSII (ΦPSII)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
dark storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with those under dark storage, light-stored seedlings showed significantly higher SD and stomatal index (SI) in leaves accompanied by higher maximal photochemical efficiency of PSII (F v /F m ) and quantum yield of PSII (ΦPSII)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In darkness, PSII efficiency and quantum yield declined with storage duration and recovered to light stored levels four days after transplanting.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
storage in darknesse0
Outcome
F v /F m and ΦPSIIe0
Direction
declined steeplye0
Qualifier
recovered gradually to reach the same level of those in light at the fourth day after transplantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During storage in darkness, F v /F m and ΦPSII declined steeply with increasing storage duration but recovered gradually to reach the same level of those in light at the fourth day after transplanting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1199 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight days of light storage produced higher net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and intercellular CO2 than dark storage.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
stored in light for 8 dayse0
Outcome
net photosynthesis rate (Pn), stomatal conductance ( g S ), intercellular CO 2 concentration (Ci)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
darknesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings stored in light for 8 days showed higher net photosynthesis rate (Pn), stomatal conductance ( g S ), intercellular CO 2 concentration (Ci), and transpiration rate (Tr) than in darkness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1395 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight days of light storage produced higher transpiration than dark storage.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
stored in light for 8 dayse0
Outcome
transpiration rate (Tr)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
darknesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings stored in light for 8 days showed higher net photosynthesis rate (Pn), stomatal conductance ( g S ), intercellular CO 2 concentration (Ci), and transpiration rate (Tr) than in darkness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1395 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–100 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recovery of photosynthesis, conductance and transpiration after storage was closely related to stomatal index.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Outcome
post-storage recovery of Pn, g S , and Tre0
Qualifier
closely related to the SIe0
Comparator
SIe0

Not reportedOrgan / stageDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The post-storage recovery of Pn, g S , and Tr were closely related to the SI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1473 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight days after transplantation, photosynthesis, conductance, intercellular CO2 and transpiration no longer differed by storage light.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
lighte0
Outcome
Pn, g S , Ci, and Tre0
Direction
no differencese0
Qualifier
after 8 days of transplantatione0
Comparator
dark storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no differences in Pn, g S , Ci, and Tr between light and dark storage were observed after 8 days of transplantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1602–1717 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Light stored seedlings appeared vigorous and had significantly higher shoot dry weight than dark stored seedlings.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Organ / stage
shoote0
Treatment
stored in lighte0
Outcome
shoot dry weighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
dark-stored onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings stored in light appeared vigorous and the shoot dry weight was significantly higher than that of dark-stored ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1719–1842 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dark stored seedlings had inhibited regrowth after transplantation.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Outcome
inhibited regrowth potentialse0
Direction
inhibitede0
Qualifier
during the subsequent transplanting stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they showed inhibited regrowth potentials during the subsequent transplanting stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1917–2000 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–100 · show in text ↑

light · growth · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

33 papers: 21 positive, 12 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

light · physiology: gas exchange · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

storage · physiology: photosynthesis · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

storage · growth · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

light · physiology: photosynthesis · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.