Paper · 2015 · Ochrana prírody Slovenska/Ekológia

Yields and Yield Components of Maize (Zea Mays L.) and Soybean (Glycine Max) as Affected by Different Tillage Methods

Ivka Kvaternjak; Ivica Kisić; Marta Birkás; et al.

11
claims
13
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract At the experiment station of the Krizevci College of Agriculture, yield and yield components of maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max) grown in rotation under five different methods of tillage were investigated. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of different tillage methods on yield and yield components of maize and soybean. The results and the determined number of plants per hectare of maize and soybean show that more favorable conditions for germination are in variants where ploughing performed in the autumn (variants C, D and E). During a four-year study, the minimum number of plants per hectare of maize and soybean was found in variant A. The dry season in panicle stage of maize in 2006 has lowered yields compared to 2008, and the drought in 2007 during the seed-filling period reduced the yield and the 1000 kernel weight of soybean compared with 2009 in all variants of tillage methods. The highest grain yield of maize was recorded in variant B. During 2006, with the unfavorable weather conditions, the lowest grain yield of maize was recorded in variant E with intensive tillage treatment. The highest yield of soybean was recorded in variant E, but there were no statistically significant differences compared to variants with the reduction of additional tillage interventions (variant B, C and D). With respect to maize grain and soybean seed yield, variant A was the lowest. Considering the achieved yields of maize grain, there is a possibility of reducing additional tillage interventions, whilst for achieving higher yield of soybean seed intensive tillage is recommended.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autumn ploughing (variants C, D and E) gave more favorable conditions for germination of maize and soybean.

Taxon
maize and soybeanGlycine maxZea mayse0
Treatment
ploughing performed in the autumne0
Outcome
conditions for germinatione0
Direction
more favorablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“determined number of plants per hectare of maize and soybean show that more favorable conditions for germination are in variants where ploughing performed in the autumn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–547 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variant A had the minimum number of plants per hectare for maize and soybean.

Taxon
maize and soybeanGlycine maxZea mayse1
Treatment
variant Ae1
Outcome
number of plants per hectaree1
Direction
minimume1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the minimum number of plants per hectare of maize and soybean was found in variant A”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–681 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The dry season in panicle stage lowered maize yields in 2006 compared with 2008.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
dry season in panicle stagee2
Outcome
yieldse2
Direction
lowerede2
Comparator
2008e2
Setting
2006e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The dry season in panicle stage of maize in 2006 has lowered yields compared to 2008”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought in 2007 during the seed-filling period reduced soybean yield and 1000 kernel weight compared with 2009.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe3
Treatment
drought in 2007 during the seed-filling periode3
Outcome
the yield and the 1000 kernel weighte3
Direction
reducede3
Comparator
2009e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“the drought in 2007 during the seed-filling period reduced the yield and the 1000 kernel weight of soybean compared with 2009”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–898 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variant B gave the highest grain yield of maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse4
Treatment
variant Be4
Outcome
grain yield of maizee4
Direction
higheste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The highest grain yield of maize was recorded in variant B”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–993 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variant E with intensive tillage gave the lowest grain yield of maize in 2006 under unfavorable weather.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse5
Treatment
variant E with intensive tillage treatmente5
Outcome
grain yield of maizee5
Direction
loweste5
Qualifier
unfavorable weather conditionse5
Setting
2006e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“During 2006, with the unfavorable weather conditions, the lowest grain yield of maize was recorded in variant E with intensive tillage treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variant E gave the highest soybean yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe6
Treatment
variant Ee6
Outcome
yield of soybeane6
Direction
higheste6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The highest yield of soybean was recorded in variant E”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean yield in variant E did not differ significantly from variants B, C and D.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe6
Treatment
variant Ee6
Outcome
yield of soybeane6
Direction
no_changeinferrede6
Comparator
variants with the reduction of additional tillage interventions (variant B, C and D)e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The highest yield of soybean was recorded in variant E”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1195 · show in text ↑
e7

“there were no statistically significant differences compared to variants with the reduction of additional tillage interventions (variant B, C and D)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1349 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variant A had the lowest seed yields of maize and soybean.

Taxon
maize and soybeanGlycine maxZea mayse1
Treatment
variant Ae1
Outcome
maize grain and soybean seed yielde2
Direction
loweste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the minimum number of plants per hectare of maize and soybean was found in variant A”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–681 · show in text ↑
e2

“With respect to maize grain and soybean seed yield, variant A was the lowest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1427 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Maize grain yields suggest that additional tillage interventions could be reduced.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse3
Outcome
reducing additional tillage interventionse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Considering the achieved yields of maize grain, there is a possibility of reducing additional tillage interventions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1544 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Intensive tillage is recommended for achieving higher soybean seed yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe4
Treatment
intensive tillagee4
Outcome
higher yield of soybean seede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“for achieving higher yield of soybean seed intensive tillage is recommended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1553–1628 · show in text ↑

tillage · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

84 papers: 52 positive, 32 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

80 papers more in this group

See all 84 papers →

drought · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

214 papers: 35 positive, 179 negative or no effect

178 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

210 papers more in this group

See all 214 papers →

tillage · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 196 positive, 87 negative or no effect

195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

drought · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

353 papers: 53 positive, 300 negative or no effect

299 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Water deficiency increased individual grain weight by 37.0%.

    The impact of source restriction on yield formation of corn (Zea mays L.) due to water deficiency · 2010 · compared with moderate irrigation until physiological maturity (W1)

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
  3. positive

349 papers more in this group

See all 353 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.