Paper · 2017 · Acta agriculturae Slovenica

Yield and its attributes responses of drought tolerant upland ‘NERICA’ rice to different nutrient supplying treatments in rainforest transitory agroecology

Olalekan Suleiman Sakariyawo; Mufutau ATAYESE; Kehinde OKELEYE; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A screen house trial was conducted to evaluate reproductive growth responses of drought tolerant upland rice cultivars (NERICAs 1-4, WAB 56-104 and Moroberekan) to arbuscular mycorrhizal (AMF) inoculation under water deficit. A field trial was organized in randomized complete block test with three replicates, conducted in the late cropping season of 2012. We evaluated upland rice cultivars to different nutrient sources (AMF, AMF + 60 kg N ha-1 + 30 kg K ha-1, 60 kg N ha-1+ 30 kg K ha-1 and control). In the screen house inoculated rice had higher (P < 0.05) grain yield plant-1 (19.29 g plant-1) and its attributes than non-inoculated, except number of grain per panicle (108). On the field combination of AMF + 60 kg N ha-1 + 30 kg K ha-1 produced higher (P < 0.05) reproductive growth. Varietal variability (P < 0.05) was observed on AM colonisation and reproductive growth in both trials, with ‘NERICA 2’was the most promising cultivar under tested agroecology condition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased rice grain yield per plant in the screen house to 19.29 g plant-1.

Treatment
arbuscular mycorrhizal (AMF) inoculatione1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
grain yield plant-1e0
Direction
highere0
Value
19.29 g plant-1e0
Comparator
non-inoculatede0
Setting
screen housee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the screen house inoculated rice had higher (P < 0.05) grain yield plant-1 (19.29 g plant-1) and its attributes than non-inoculated, except number of grain per panicle (108).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–682 · show in text ↑
e1

“arbuscular mycorrhizal (AMF) inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased rice yield attributes other than grain number per panicle in the screen house.

Treatment
arbuscular mycorrhizal (AMF) inoculatione1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
its attributese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non-inoculatede0
Setting
screen housee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the screen house inoculated rice had higher (P < 0.05) grain yield plant-1 (19.29 g plant-1) and its attributes than non-inoculated, except number of grain per panicle (108).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–682 · show in text ↑
e1

“arbuscular mycorrhizal (AMF) inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain number per panicle was an exception to the higher attributes under AMF inoculation, with 108 reported.

Treatment
arbuscular mycorrhizal (AMF) inoculatione2
Interactor
AMFe2symbiont
Outcome
number of grain per paniclee0
Value
108e0
Comparator
non-inoculatede1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“except number of grain per panicle (108)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–681 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculated rice had higher (P < 0.05) grain yield plant-1 (19.29 g plant-1) and its attributes than non-inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–639 · show in text ↑
e2

“arbuscular mycorrhizal (AMF) inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Field application of AMF with nitrogen and potassium produced higher reproductive growth.

Treatment
AMF + 60 kg N ha-1 + 30 kg K ha-1e0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
reproductive growthe0
Direction
highere0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the field combination of AMF + 60 kg N ha-1 + 30 kg K ha-1 produced higher (P < 0.05) reproductive growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–792 · show in text ↑
e1

“A screen house trial was conducted to evaluate reproductive growth responses of drought tolerant upland rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–118 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice cultivars differed significantly in AM colonisation in both trials.

Material
upland rice cultivarse1
Interactor
AMe0symbiont
Outcome
AM colonisatione0
Direction
Varietal variabilitye0
Setting
both trialse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Varietal variability (P < 0.05) was observed on AM colonisation and reproductive growth in both trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–895 · show in text ↑
e1

“A screen house trial was conducted to evaluate reproductive growth responses of drought tolerant upland rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–118 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice cultivars differed significantly in reproductive growth in both trials.

Material
upland rice cultivarse1
Outcome
reproductive growthe0
Direction
Varietal variabilitye0
Setting
both trialse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Varietal variability (P < 0.05) was observed on AM colonisation and reproductive growth in both trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–895 · show in text ↑
e1

“A screen house trial was conducted to evaluate reproductive growth responses of drought tolerant upland rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NERICA 2 was the most promising rice cultivar in the tested agroecology.

Material
NERICA 2e0
Outcome
most promising cultivare0
Direction
most promisinge0
Setting
tested agroecology conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘NERICA 2’was the most promising cultivar under tested agroecology condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–978 · show in text ↑
e1

“A screen house trial was conducted to evaluate reproductive growth responses of drought tolerant upland rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–118 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

61 papers: 57 positive, 4 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 37 positive, 4 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

inoculation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

418 papers: 382 positive, 36 negative or no effect

381 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

414 papers more in this group

See all 418 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

401 papers in the same direction as this paper · 101 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.