Paper · 2017 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Response of wheat genotypes to zinc fertilization for improving productivity and quality

Prakash Chand Ghasal; Yashbir Singh Shivay; Vijay Pooniya; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
40
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of zinc (Zn) fertilization on yield potentiality and quality of promising wheat varieties during winter seasons of 2013–14 and 2014–15 at the research farm of the Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi. Among genotypes, HD 2967 genotype proved as best in realizing the highest grain yield (4.89 Mg ha−1), net returns and benefit–cost ratio besides increased protein (13.4%) and wet gluten (29.4%) content in grain. Highest grain Zn concentration and recovery efficiency (RE) recorded in HD 2851 and HD 2687, respectively. HD 2932 registered lowest grain hardiness index (GHI) followed by PBW 343, indicating their better bread-making quality. With respect to Zn fertilization, application of 1.25 kg Zn Zn–ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (Zn–EDTA) + 0.5% foliar spray at maximum tillering and booting stages resulted in the highest yields, grain Zn concentration and RE followed by 2.5 kg Zn (ZnSO4·7H2O) + 0.5% foliar spray at both stages. These treatments are also superior most with respect to grain quality parameters such as protein, wet gluten and starch content. From profitability viewpoint, 2.5 kg Zn (ZnSO4·7H2O) + 0.5% two foliar sprays were most remunerative with maximum net returns and benefit–cost ratio.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HD 2967 had the highest grain yield, 4.89 Mg ha−1.

Material
HD 2967e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.89 Mg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HD 2967 genotype proved as best in realizing the highest grain yield (4.89 Mg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–371 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HD 2967 had the highest net returns and benefit–cost ratio.

Material
HD 2967e0
Outcome
net returns and benefit–cost ratioe0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HD 2967 genotype proved as best in realizing the highest grain yield (4.89 Mg ha−1), net returns and benefit–cost ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–407 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HD 2967 had increased grain protein content of 13.4%.

Material
HD 2967e0
Outcome
proteine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.4%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HD 2967 genotype proved as best in realizing the highest grain yield (4.89 Mg ha−1), net returns and benefit–cost ratio besides increased protein (13.4%) and wet gluten (29.4%) content in grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–481 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HD 2967 had increased grain wet gluten content of 29.4%.

Material
HD 2967e0
Outcome
wet glutene0
Direction
increasede0
Value
29.4%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HD 2967 genotype proved as best in realizing the highest grain yield (4.89 Mg ha−1), net returns and benefit–cost ratio besides increased protein (13.4%) and wet gluten (29.4%) content in grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–481 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HD 2851 had the highest grain zinc concentration.

Material
HD 2851e0
Outcome
grain Zn concentratione0
Direction
Higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest grain Zn concentration and recovery efficiency (RE) recorded in HD 2851 and HD 2687, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–589 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HD 2687 had the highest zinc recovery efficiency.

Material
HD 2687e0
Outcome
recovery efficiencye0
Direction
Higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest grain Zn concentration and recovery efficiency (RE) recorded in HD 2851 and HD 2687, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–589 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HD 2932 had the lowest grain hardiness index.

Material
HD 2932e0
Outcome
grain hardiness indexe0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HD 2932 registered lowest grain hardiness index (GHI) followed by PBW 343, indicating their better bread-making quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–710 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PBW 343 followed HD 2932 for low grain hardiness index.

Material
PBW 343e0
Outcome
grain hardiness indexe0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HD 2932 registered lowest grain hardiness index (GHI) followed by PBW 343, indicating their better bread-making quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–710 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc EDTA plus foliar spray gave the highest yields, grain zinc and recovery efficiency.

Treatment
1.25 kg Zn Zn–ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (Zn–EDTA) + 0.5% foliar spraye0
Outcome
yields, grain Zn concentration and REe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
2.5 kg Zn (ZnSO4·7H2O) + 0.5% foliar spraye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 1.25 kg Zn Zn–ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (Zn–EDTA) + 0.5% foliar spray at maximum tillering and booting stages resulted in the highest yields, grain Zn concentration and RE followed by 2.5 kg Zn (ZnSO4·7H2O) + 0.5% foliar spray at both stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The zinc treatments were superior for protein, wet gluten and starch content.

Treatment
These treatmentse0
Outcome
protein, wet gluten and starch contente0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These treatments are also superior most with respect to grain quality parameters such as protein, wet gluten and starch content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc sulfate plus two foliar sprays gave the greatest net returns and benefit–cost ratio.

Treatment
2.5 kg Zn (ZnSO4·7H2O) + 0.5% two foliar sprayse0
Outcome
net returns and benefit–cost ratioe0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2.5 kg Zn (ZnSO4·7H2O) + 0.5% two foliar sprays were most remunerative with maximum net returns and benefit–cost ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1290 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

1310384 · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

acetic acid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.