Paper · 1990 · HortScience

CHEMICAL THINNING OF `GRANNY SMITH' APPLE

Warren C. Micke; Joseph A. Grant; Maxwell V. Norton; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Under California conditions `Granny Smith' apple does not “self-thin” sufficiently to promote good return bloom nor to provide fruit size desired for the fresh market. Preliminary studies conducted during 1985-87 indicated that 1-naphthyl N-methylcarbamate (carbaryl), 1-naphthaleneacetic Acid (NAA), and 1-naphthaleneacetamide (NAD) could be useful for thinning `Granny Smith'. Detailed studies conducted in 1988 and 89 using dilute handgun applications demonstrated that all 3 materials provided reasonable thinning as shown by fruit set counts. NAA and NAD tended to slow fruit growth as compared to carbaryl. Carbaryl tended to uniformly thin clusters while NAA and NAD were more likely to remove all the fruit from some clusters and few fruit from others, especially in 1988. Compared to the control, all materials applied in 1988 improved return bloom in 1989 with carbaryl having a slightly greater effect than NAA and NAD. As a result of these studies carbaryl at 1.7 to 2.2 kg (active ingredient) per ha as a dilute application is being suggested for grower trials in California.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbaryl, NAA and NAD all gave reasonable thinning of Granny Smith apple in 1988 and 1989

Material
Granny Smithe0
Treatment
all 3 materialse1
Outcome
thinninge1
Direction
reasonablee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Granny Smith' apple does not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“Detailed studies conducted in 1988 and 89 using dilute handgun applications demonstrated that all 3 materials provided reasonable thinning as shown by fruit set counts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–546 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA and NAD tended to slow fruit growth compared with carbaryl

Treatment
NAA and NADe2
Outcome
fruit growthe2
Direction
tended to slowe2
Comparator
carbaryle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Granny Smith' apple does not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–57 · show in text ↑
e2

“NAA and NAD tended to slow fruit growth as compared to carbaryl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–611 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbaryl tended to uniformly thin clusters compared with NAA and NAD

Treatment
Carbaryle3
Outcome
thin clusterse3
Direction
uniformly thine3
Comparator
NAA and NADe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Granny Smith' apple does not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–57 · show in text ↑
e3

“Carbaryl tended to uniformly thin clusters while NAA and NAD were more likely to remove all the fruit from some clusters and few fruit from others, especially in 1988”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–779 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA and NAD were more likely than carbaryl to remove all the fruit from some clusters

Treatment
NAA and NADe3
Outcome
remove all the fruit from some clusterse3
Direction
more likelye3
Comparator
Carbaryle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Granny Smith' apple does not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–57 · show in text ↑
e3

“Carbaryl tended to uniformly thin clusters while NAA and NAD were more likely to remove all the fruit from some clusters and few fruit from others, especially in 1988”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–779 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All materials applied in 1988 improved return bloom in 1989 compared with the control

Treatment
all materials applied in 1988e4
Outcome
return bloom in 1989e4
Direction
improvede4
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Granny Smith' apple does not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–57 · show in text ↑
e4

“Compared to the control, all materials applied in 1988 improved return bloom in 1989 with carbaryl having a slightly greater effect than NAA and NAD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–929 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbaryl had a slightly greater effect on return bloom than NAA and NAD

Treatment
carbaryle4
Outcome
return bloome4
Direction
slightly greater effecte4
Comparator
NAA and NADe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Granny Smith' apple does not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–57 · show in text ↑
e4

“Compared to the control, all materials applied in 1988 improved return bloom in 1989 with carbaryl having a slightly greater effect than NAA and NAD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–929 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Carbaryl at 1.7 to 2.2 kg active ingredient per ha as a dilute application is suggested for grower trials in California

Outcome
carbaryl at 1.7 to 2.2 kg (active ingredient) per ha as a dilute applicatione5
Setting
Californiae5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Granny Smith' apple does not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–57 · show in text ↑
e5

“carbaryl at 1.7 to 2.2 kg (active ingredient) per ha as a dilute application is being suggested for grower trials in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1087 · show in text ↑

carbaryl · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

42 papers: 32 positive, 10 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

43 papers: 31 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetamide · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetamide · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

carbaryl · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.