Paper · 2017 · Pure and Applied Biology

Effect of farmyard manure and rhizobium inoculation on growth of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) variety “karak-03”

Nangial Khan

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The experiment was performed at the Agronomy Farm in The University of Agriculture Peshawar, Pakistan during winter 2015 using simple randomized completely block design (RCBD) with three replications. The experiment contained a total of 32 treatment units. FYM application at four levels (0, 5, 10, and 15 ton ha -1 ) with variety (Inoculated and non-inoculated) were included in experiment. FYM application @ 15 ton ha -1 resulted in a significant growth than5 ton ha -1 , 10 ton ha -1 and the control. Similarly inoculated seeds produced better crop growth as compared to non-inoculated seed. The parameters such as plant height and nodule per plant were significantly affected by both the FYM and inoculation, while days required for emerging 50% plants and emergence per m 2 were also significantly affected but only by FYM. Higher plant height (74.33) and nodule per plant (68.24) was counted in plots treated with FYM @ 15 ton ha -1 as compared to other levels. Similarly Higher plant height (73.54) and nodule per plant (69.50) was counted in plots with inoculated seeds. Hence application of FYM @15t ha -1 and inoculation with Rhizobium strains are the recommended practices for better growth and crop stand of chickpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM at 15 t/ha gave significantly higher growth than 5 t/ha, 10 t/ha and the control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
FYM application @ 15 ton ha -1e1
Outcome
growthe1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Comparator
5 ton ha -1 , 10 ton ha -1 and the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“FYM application @ 15 ton ha -1 resulted in a significant growth than5 ton ha -1 , 10 ton ha -1 and the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium-inoculated seeds produced better chickpea crop growth than non-inoculated seed.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
inoculated seedse2
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume7symbiont
Outcome
crop growthe2
Direction
bettere2
Comparator
non-inoculated seede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–73 · show in text ↑
e2

“Similarly inoculated seeds produced better crop growth as compared to non-inoculated seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–593 · show in text ↑
e7

“application of FYM @15t ha -1 and inoculation with Rhizobium strains are the recommended practices for better growth and crop stand of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1228 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM and inoculation significantly affected chickpea plant height and nodule number per plant.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
FYM and inoculatione3
Outcome
plant height and nodule per plante3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–73 · show in text ↑
e3

“The parameters such as plant height and nodule per plant were significantly affected by both the FYM and inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–711 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM significantly affected days to 50% emergence and emergence per m2 in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
FYMe4
Outcome
days required for emerging 50% plants and emergence per m 2e4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–73 · show in text ↑
e4

“while days required for emerging 50% plants and emergence per m 2 were also significantly affected but only by FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–827 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height was higher at 74.33 under FYM at 15 t/ha than at other levels.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
FYM @ 15 ton ha -1e5
Outcome
plant heighte5
Direction
Highere5
Value
74.33e5
Comparator
other levelse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–73 · show in text ↑
e5

“Higher plant height (74.33) and nodule per plant (68.24) was counted in plots treated with FYM @ 15 ton ha -1 as compared to other levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–966 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodule number per plant was higher at 68.24 under FYM at 15 t/ha than at other levels.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
FYM @ 15 ton ha -1e5
Outcome
nodule per plante5
Direction
Highere5
Value
68.24e5
Comparator
other levelse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–73 · show in text ↑
e5

“Higher plant height (74.33) and nodule per plant (68.24) was counted in plots treated with FYM @ 15 ton ha -1 as compared to other levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–966 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height was higher at 73.54 in plots with inoculated seeds.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
inoculated seedse6
Outcome
plant heighte6
Direction
Highere6
Value
73.54e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–73 · show in text ↑
e6

“Similarly Higher plant height (73.54) and nodule per plant (69.50) was counted in plots with inoculated seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1077 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodule number per plant was higher at 69.50 in plots with inoculated seeds.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
inoculated seedse6
Outcome
nodule per plante6
Direction
Highere6
Value
69.50e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–73 · show in text ↑
e6

“Similarly Higher plant height (73.54) and nodule per plant (69.50) was counted in plots with inoculated seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1077 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

FYM at 15 t/ha with Rhizobium inoculation is recommended for better chickpea growth and crop stand.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume7
Treatment
application of FYM @15t ha -1 and inoculation with Rhizobium strainse7
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume7symbiont
Outcome
growth and crop stande7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“application of FYM @15t ha -1 and inoculation with Rhizobium strains are the recommended practices for better growth and crop stand of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1228 · show in text ↑

fertilization · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

48 papers: 43 positive, 5 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

inoculation · Rhizobium · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 32 positive, 1 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 99 positive, 6 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 110 positive, 4 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

110 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

inoculation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

152 papers: 135 positive, 17 negative or no effect

134 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

148 papers more in this group

See all 152 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.