Paper · 2016 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Efficacy of biological, organic and inorganic substrates of nutrients on yield attributing characters, sensory evaluation and economics of strawberry cv. Chandler under Lucknow conditions

Rubee Lata; Deepa H. Dwivedi; R.B. Ram; et al.

4
claims
13
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted for two years to study the performance of strawberry cv. Chandler as affected by the biological, organic and inorganic nutrient substrates under sub-tropical conditions. Integrated application of strawberry runners with bio-fertilizers, farmyard manure and NPK significantly influenced the yield and yield attributing characters, sensory attributes and benefit: cost ratio of strawberry grown under saline soils of sub-tropical conditions of Uttar Pradesh. Treatment T8 [Azotobacter (50%) + Azospirillum (50%) + NPK (50%)] was most effective for commercial cultivation with higher yield (287.0 g/plant), better fruit quality, overall acceptability by the consumers and remunerative (B:C, 4.78:1.00) to the farmers compared to control (141.57 g/plant).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated application of strawberry runners with bio-fertilizers, farmyard manure and NPK significantly influenced yield and yield attributing characters, sensory attributes and benefit:cost ratio of strawberry.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Material
cv. Chandlere0
Treatment
Integrated application of strawberry runners with bio-fertilizers, farmyard manure and NPKe1
Outcome
yield and yield attributing characters, sensory attributes and benefit: cost ratioe1
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted for two years to study the performance of strawberry cv. Chandler as affected by the biological, organic and inorganic nutrient substrates under sub-tropical conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–201 · show in text ↑
e1

“Integrated application of strawberry runners with bio-fertilizers, farmyard manure and NPK significantly influenced the yield and yield attributing characters, sensory attributes and benefit: cost ratio of strawberry grown under saline soils of sub-tropical conditions of Uttar Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–488 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T8 (Azotobacter, Azospirillum and NPK at 50% each) gave higher strawberry yield (287.0 g/plant) than control (141.57 g/plant).

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Material
cv. Chandlere0
Treatment
Azotobacter (50%) + Azospirillum (50%) + NPK (50%)e2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
287.0 g/plante2
Qualifier
141.57 g/plante3
Comparator
controle3
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted for two years to study the performance of strawberry cv. Chandler as affected by the biological, organic and inorganic nutrient substrates under sub-tropical conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–201 · show in text ↑
e2

“Treatment T8 [Azotobacter (50%) + Azospirillum (50%) + NPK (50%)] was most effective for commercial cultivation with higher yield (287.0 g/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–635 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to control (141.57 g/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T8 gave better strawberry fruit quality and overall acceptability than control.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Material
cv. Chandlere0
Treatment
Azotobacter (50%) + Azospirillum (50%) + NPK (50%)e2
Outcome
fruit quality, overall acceptabilitye4
Direction
bettere4
Comparator
controle3
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted for two years to study the performance of strawberry cv. Chandler as affected by the biological, organic and inorganic nutrient substrates under sub-tropical conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–201 · show in text ↑
e2

“Treatment T8 [Azotobacter (50%) + Azospirillum (50%) + NPK (50%)] was most effective for commercial cultivation with higher yield (287.0 g/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–635 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to control (141.57 g/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–783 · show in text ↑
e4

“better fruit quality, overall acceptability by the consumers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T8 gave a benefit:cost ratio of 4.78:1.00 and was remunerative compared to control.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Material
cv. Chandlere0
Treatment
Azotobacter (50%) + Azospirillum (50%) + NPK (50%)e2
Outcome
B:Ce5
Direction
remunerativee5
Value
4.78:1.00e5
Comparator
controle3
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted for two years to study the performance of strawberry cv. Chandler as affected by the biological, organic and inorganic nutrient substrates under sub-tropical conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–201 · show in text ↑
e2

“Treatment T8 [Azotobacter (50%) + Azospirillum (50%) + NPK (50%)] was most effective for commercial cultivation with higher yield (287.0 g/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–635 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to control (141.57 g/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–783 · show in text ↑
e5

“remunerative (B:C, 4.78:1.00) to the farmers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–746 · show in text ↑

Azospirillum · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Azotobacter · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

31 papers: 31 positive, 0 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 16 positive, 5 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

fertilization · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

229 papers: 193 positive, 36 negative or no effect

192 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

225 papers more in this group

See all 229 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.