Paper · 2016 · Tropical Agriculture

Grain yield N uptake and crude protein production in winter sorghum [Sorghum bicolor L Moench] as influenced by tillage practices and integrated nutrient management in the Vertisols of semiarid tropical India 121

S.L. Patil; M. N. Sheelavantar

16
claims
27
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the winter seasons of 1994-1995 and 1995-1996 to study the effect of tillage and N management on winter sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] under dryland conditions in Vertisols of Bijapur, Karnataka State, India. The grain, stover, total N uptake at harvest, and crude protein production increased from shallow tillage (7.5 cm) to deep tillage (30 cm) and N application up to 50 kg ha-1 compared to lower N rates. Among the different organic materials, i.e., farmyard manure (at 2.5 t ha-1), vermicompost (at 1.0 t ha-1), and Leucaena sp. loppings (at 2.5 t ha-1), application of Leucaena sp. loppings proved beneficial with greater sorghum production. Deep tillage compared to shallow tillage, produced greater grain (45%), stover (33%), total N uptake (79%), and crude protein production (80%) at harvest. Incorporation of Leucaena sp. loppings increased the sorghum grain yield, total N uptake, and crude protein production by 9 and 19% over vermicompost. Application of organic materials and 25 kg N ha-1 was beneficial with mild to severe drought at reproductive stages of crop growth during 1994-1995. During 1995-1996, when rainfall distribution was uniform, application of organic materials along with increase in N up to 50 kg ha-1 proved beneficial with greater N uptake, crude protein, and sorghum grain production. In the pooled data, application of 50 kg N ha-1 produced significantly greater grain yield (23%), stover yield (20%), total N uptake (63%), and crude protein production (64%) compared to the control. Deep tillage with application of Leucaena sp. loppings and 25 kg N ha-1 during drought years were beneficial, whereas further application of 25 kg N ha-1 at 30 days after sowing proved beneficial during normal rainfall situations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage increased grain yield by 45% versus shallow tillage.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Deep tillagee0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
greatere0
Value
45%e0
Comparator
shallow tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deep tillage compared to shallow tillage, produced greater grain (45%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–766 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage increased stover by 33%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Deep tillagee0
Outcome
stovere0
Direction
greatere0
Value
33%e0
Comparator
shallow tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deep tillage compared to shallow tillage, produced greater grain (45%), stover (33%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–780 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage increased total nitrogen uptake by 79%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Deep tillagee0
Outcome
total N uptakee0
Direction
greatere0
Value
79%e0
Comparator
shallow tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deep tillage compared to shallow tillage, produced greater grain (45%), stover (33%), total N uptake (79%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–802 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage increased crude protein production by 80%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Deep tillagee0
Outcome
crude protein productione0
Direction
greatere0
Value
80%e0
Comparator
shallow tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deep tillage compared to shallow tillage, produced greater grain (45%), stover (33%), total N uptake (79%), and crude protein production (80%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–838 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leucaena loppings gave greater sorghum production among organic materials.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Leucaena sp. loppingse0
Outcome
sorghum productione0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of Leucaena sp. loppings proved beneficial with greater sorghum production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leucaena loppings increased grain yield over vermicompost.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Leucaena sp. loppingse0
Outcome
sorghum grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
vermicomposte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Incorporation of Leucaena sp. loppings increased the sorghum grain yield, total N uptake, and crude protein production by 9 and 19% over vermicompost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1000 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leucaena loppings increased total nitrogen uptake over vermicompost.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Leucaena sp. loppingse0
Outcome
total N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
vermicomposte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Incorporation of Leucaena sp. loppings increased the sorghum grain yield, total N uptake, and crude protein production by 9 and 19% over vermicompost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1000 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leucaena loppings increased crude protein production over vermicompost.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Leucaena sp. loppingse0
Outcome
crude protein productione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
vermicomposte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Incorporation of Leucaena sp. loppings increased the sorghum grain yield, total N uptake, and crude protein production by 9 and 19% over vermicompost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1000 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifty kilograms nitrogen per hectare increased pooled grain yield by 23% versus control.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
50 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
23%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 50 kg N ha-1 produced significantly greater grain yield (23%), stover yield (20%), total N uptake (63%), and crude protein production (64%) compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1568 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifty kilograms nitrogen per hectare increased pooled stover yield by 20%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
50 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
20%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 50 kg N ha-1 produced significantly greater grain yield (23%), stover yield (20%), total N uptake (63%), and crude protein production (64%) compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1568 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifty kilograms nitrogen per hectare increased pooled total nitrogen uptake by 63%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
50 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
total N uptakee0
Direction
greatere0
Value
63%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 50 kg N ha-1 produced significantly greater grain yield (23%), stover yield (20%), total N uptake (63%), and crude protein production (64%) compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1568 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifty kilograms nitrogen per hectare increased pooled crude protein production by 64%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
50 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
crude protein productione0
Direction
greatere0
Value
64%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 50 kg N ha-1 produced significantly greater grain yield (23%), stover yield (20%), total N uptake (63%), and crude protein production (64%) compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1568 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic materials plus 25 kilograms nitrogen per hectare were beneficial during drought.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
organic materials and 25 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
beneficiale0
Qualifier
mild to severe droughte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of organic materials and 25 kg N ha-1 was beneficial with mild to severe drought at reproductive stages of crop growth during 1994-1995”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic materials plus nitrogen up to 50 kilograms per hectare benefited uptake, protein, and grain production with uniform rainfall.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
organic materials along with increase in N up to 50 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
N uptake, crude protein, and sorghum grain productione0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of organic materials along with increase in N up to 50 kg ha-1 proved beneficial with greater N uptake, crude protein, and sorghum grain production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1368 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage with Leucaena loppings and nitrogen was beneficial in drought years.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
Deep tillage with application of Leucaena sp. loppings and 25 kg N ha-1e0
Qualifier
drought yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deep tillage with application of Leucaena sp. loppings and 25 kg N ha-1 during drought years were beneficial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1678 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–67 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Additional nitrogen at 30 days after sowing was beneficial under normal rainfall.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
further application of 25 kg N ha-1 at 30 days after sowinge0
Qualifier
normal rainfall situationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“further application of 25 kg N ha-1 at 30 days after sowing proved beneficial during normal rainfall situations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1688–1799 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–67 · show in text ↑

Leucaena · nutrient: content · SorghumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Leucaena · yield · SorghumResults agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · SorghumResults differ

47 papers: 43 positive, 4 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

tillage · yield · SorghumResults differ

123 papers: 102 positive, 21 negative or no effect

101 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

tillage · quality: protein · SorghumPositive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

tillage · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results

52 papers: 46 positive, 6 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

nitrogen · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

290 papers: 264 positive, 26 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

286 papers more in this group

See all 290 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.