Paper · 2017 · Agricultural Research Journal

Effect of aba on response of cotton genotypes in terms of morphophysiological parameters and osmolytes against salinity stress

Kamini Devi; M K Sangha; P Kumar; et al.

12
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In the present study, effect of seed priming with abscissic acid (ABA 5 µM) on response of cotton seedlings (tolerant and susceptible to salinity stress (18 dS/m) was investigated. Fifteen day old seedlings registered decrease in shoot length (50.6%) and root length (41.6%), shoot weight (50%) and root weight (41%), leaf relative water content (26%), chlorophyll content (56%) and Fv/Fm (12.9%) in susceptible cotton genotypes to greater degree than the tolerant ones in response to salinity. However proline, glycine, betaine, and total sugars registered an increase. The increase was even more with ABA priming (with salinity) in susceptible seedling leaves. ABA treatment also had positive effect on the physiological and growth parameters. Thus, ABA seed pre-treatment ameliorated the negative impact of salinity stress in susceptible cotton seedlings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under salinity stress, shoot length decreased by 50.6% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones.

Material
susceptible cotton genotypese1
Treatment
salinitye1
Outcome
shoot lengthe1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
50.6%e1
Comparator
tolerant onese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Fifteen day old seedlings registered decrease in shoot length (50.6%) and root length (41.6%), shoot weight (50%) and root weight (41%), leaf relative water content (26%), chlorophyll content (56%) and Fv/Fm (12.9%) in susceptible cotton genotypes to greater degree than the tolerant ones in response to salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under salinity stress, root length decreased by 41.6% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones.

Material
susceptible cotton genotypese1
Treatment
salinitye1
Outcome
root lengthe1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
41.6%e1
Comparator
tolerant onese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Fifteen day old seedlings registered decrease in shoot length (50.6%) and root length (41.6%), shoot weight (50%) and root weight (41%), leaf relative water content (26%), chlorophyll content (56%) and Fv/Fm (12.9%) in susceptible cotton genotypes to greater degree than the tolerant ones in response to salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under salinity stress, shoot weight decreased by 50% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones.

Material
susceptible cotton genotypese1
Treatment
salinitye1
Outcome
shoot weighte1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
50%e1
Comparator
tolerant onese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Fifteen day old seedlings registered decrease in shoot length (50.6%) and root length (41.6%), shoot weight (50%) and root weight (41%), leaf relative water content (26%), chlorophyll content (56%) and Fv/Fm (12.9%) in susceptible cotton genotypes to greater degree than the tolerant ones in response to salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under salinity stress, root weight decreased by 41% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones.

Material
susceptible cotton genotypese1
Treatment
salinitye1
Outcome
root weighte1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
41%e1
Comparator
tolerant onese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Fifteen day old seedlings registered decrease in shoot length (50.6%) and root length (41.6%), shoot weight (50%) and root weight (41%), leaf relative water content (26%), chlorophyll content (56%) and Fv/Fm (12.9%) in susceptible cotton genotypes to greater degree than the tolerant ones in response to salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under salinity stress, leaf relative water content decreased by 26% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones.

Material
susceptible cotton genotypese1
Treatment
salinitye1
Outcome
leaf relative water contente1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
26%e1
Comparator
tolerant onese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Fifteen day old seedlings registered decrease in shoot length (50.6%) and root length (41.6%), shoot weight (50%) and root weight (41%), leaf relative water content (26%), chlorophyll content (56%) and Fv/Fm (12.9%) in susceptible cotton genotypes to greater degree than the tolerant ones in response to salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under salinity stress, chlorophyll content decreased by 56% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones.

Material
susceptible cotton genotypese1
Treatment
salinitye1
Outcome
chlorophyll contente1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
56%e1
Comparator
tolerant onese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Fifteen day old seedlings registered decrease in shoot length (50.6%) and root length (41.6%), shoot weight (50%) and root weight (41%), leaf relative water content (26%), chlorophyll content (56%) and Fv/Fm (12.9%) in susceptible cotton genotypes to greater degree than the tolerant ones in response to salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under salinity stress, Fv/Fm decreased by 12.9% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones.

Material
susceptible cotton genotypese1
Treatment
salinitye1
Outcome
Fv/Fme1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
12.9%e1
Comparator
tolerant onese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Fifteen day old seedlings registered decrease in shoot length (50.6%) and root length (41.6%), shoot weight (50%) and root weight (41%), leaf relative water content (26%), chlorophyll content (56%) and Fv/Fm (12.9%) in susceptible cotton genotypes to greater degree than the tolerant ones in response to salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline, glycine and betaine increased in cotton in response to salinity.

Treatment
salinitye2
Outcome
proline, glycine, betainee1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–45 · show in text ↑
e1

“proline, glycine, betaine, and total sugars registered an increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–569 · show in text ↑
e2

“in response to salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total sugars increased in cotton in response to salinity.

Treatment
salinitye2
Outcome
total sugarse1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–45 · show in text ↑
e1

“proline, glycine, betaine, and total sugars registered an increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–569 · show in text ↑
e2

“in response to salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The increase in osmolytes was even greater with ABA priming under salinity in susceptible seedling leaves.

Treatment
ABA priminge1
Outcome
The increasee1
Direction
even moree1
Qualifier
in susceptible seedling leavese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–45 · show in text ↑
e1

“The increase was even more with ABA priming (with salinity) in susceptible seedling leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA treatment had a positive effect on physiological and growth parameters of cotton.

Treatment
ABA treatmente1
Outcome
physiological and growth parameterse1
Direction
positive effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–45 · show in text ↑
e1

“ABA treatment also had positive effect on the physiological and growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–744 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA seed pre-treatment ameliorated the negative impact of salinity stress in susceptible cotton seedlings.

Treatment
ABA seed pre-treatmente1
Outcome
negative impact of salinity stresse1
Direction
amelioratede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ABA seed pre-treatment ameliorated the negative impact of salinity stress in susceptible cotton seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–857 · show in text ↑

(+)-abscisic acid · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

salinity · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

16 papers: 1 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

salinity · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

26 papers: 4 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

salinity · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 8 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

salinity · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

108 papers: 16 positive, 92 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

104 papers more in this group

See all 108 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.