Paper · 2013 · CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (Fondazione Edmund Mach)

Relevance of the plant genotype for biocontrol tools based on resistance induction

H. Banani; Benedetta Roatti; B. Ezzahi; et al.

13
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Downy mildew caused by Plasmopara viticola is a serious disease of grapevine, and its control is based on the intense application of chemical fungicide. We previously shown Trichoderma harzianum T39 (T39) and benzothiadiazole-7-carbothioic acid S-methyl ester (BTH) reduce downy mildew severity in the Pinot Noir grapevine variety by enhancing plant resistance. However, the effect of the plant genotype on the resistance induction mechanisms was not yet analyzed in grapevine. The aim of this study was to characterize the physiological and molecular properties of the T39-induced resistance in different grapevine varieties used for table and wine grape production, in order to further optimize the use of this agent for downy mildew control. Rooted cutting from 14 grapevine varieties were grown under greenhouse conditions. T39 conidia, BTH and water (control) were applied to grapevine leaves and Plasmopara viticola sporangia were then inoculated. Here we showed that T39 treatment significantly reduces downy mildew symptoms in the different grapevine varieties. However, different levels of T39 efficacy were observed: T39 efficacy was particularly high in Negroamaro plants, but it was lower in Primitivo than in Pinot Noir plants, indicating that the plant genotype is a key determinant of T39-induced resistance. Moreover, the efficacy of resistance activated by BTH was higher than T39 and was not affected by the grapevine genotype. Gene expression analysis of four defence marker genes confirms the complex effect of the plant genotype on the molecular mechanism activated by pathogen inoculation and by T39 treatment in different varieties. In Pinot Noir and Primitivo varieties, T39-induced resistance is based on a dual effect: direct induction of PR-2 and PR-4 genes and enhanced expression of these genes after pathogen inoculation. Correlation between gene expression and T39 efficacy was observed in Primitivo and Pinot Noir plants, but more complex regulation or additional defence genes are implicated in the T39-induced resistance in the variety Sugraone and Negroamaro. Grapevine varieties have different reaction to the same stimuli, indicating that specific receptors are probably involved in the regulation of the plant response. The evidence reported here suggests that a good resistance inducer should be applied on a highly responsive cultivar in order to maximize the effect of the biocontrol agent.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T39 significantly reduced downy mildew symptoms across grapevine varieties.

Taxon
grapevineVitise0
Treatment
T39 treatmente0
Outcome
downy mildew symptomse0
Direction
reducese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Here we showed that T39 treatment significantly reduces downy mildew symptoms in the different grapevine varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1069 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T39 efficacy was particularly high in Negroamaro plants.

Taxon
Negroamaroe0
Outcome
T39 efficacye0
Direction
particularly highe0

Verbatim

e0

“T39 efficacy was particularly high in Negroamaro plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1182 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T39 efficacy was lower in Primitivo than Pinot Noir plants.

Taxon
Primitivoe0
Material
Primitivoe0
Outcome
lowere0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
Pinot Noire0

Verbatim

e0

“it was lower in Primitivo than in Pinot Noir plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BTH activated resistance more effectively than T39.

Treatment
BTHe0
Outcome
efficacy of resistancee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
T39e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the efficacy of resistance activated by BTH was higher than T39”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1397 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BTH efficacy was unaffected by grapevine genotype.

Taxon
grapevineVitise0
Material
grapevine genotypee0
Outcome
was not affectede0
Direction
not affectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was not affected by the grapevine genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1444 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gene expression confirmed a complex genotype effect on responses to pathogen inoculation and T39 treatment.

Material
plant genotypee0
Treatment
T39 treatmente0
Outcome
Gene expressione0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Gene expression analysis of four defence marker genes confirms the complex effect of the plant genotype on the molecular mechanism activated by pathogen inoculation and by T39 treatment in different varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1655 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Pinot Noir and Primitivo, T39 directly induced PR-2 and PR-4 genes.

Material
Pinot Noir and Primitivoe0
Treatment
T39-inducede0
Gene
PR-2 and PR-4e0
Outcome
direct induction of PR-2 and PR-4 genese0
Direction
inductione0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In Pinot Noir and Primitivo varieties, T39-induced resistance is based on a dual effect: direct induction of PR-2 and PR-4 genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Pinot Noir and Primitivo, T39 enhanced PR-2 and PR-4 expression after pathogen inoculation.

Treatment
pathogen inoculatione0
Outcome
expression of these genese0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced expression of these genes after pathogen inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1789–1850 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gene expression correlated with T39 efficacy in Primitivo and Pinot Noir.

Taxon
Primitivo and Pinot Noire0
Material
Primitivo and Pinot Noire0
Gene
gene expressione0
Outcome
T39 efficacye0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Correlation between gene expression and T39 efficacy was observed in Primitivo and Pinot Noir plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1852–1952 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors implicate complex regulation or additional defence genes in Sugraone and Negroamaro T39 resistance.

Taxon
Sugraone and Negroamaroe0
Gene
additional defence genese0
Outcome
T39-induced resistancee0

Verbatim

e0

“more complex regulation or additional defence genes are implicated in the T39-induced resistance in the variety Sugraone and Negroamaro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1958–2093 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grapevine varieties reacted differently to the same stimuli.

Taxon
GrapevineVitise0
Outcome
different reaction to the same stimulie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grapevine varieties have different reaction to the same stimuli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2095–2158 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest specific receptors probably regulate plant responses.

Gene
specific receptorse0
Outcome
regulation of the plant responsee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“specific receptors are probably involved in the regulation of the plant response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2176–2256 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend applying a resistance inducer to a highly responsive cultivar.

Outcome
applied on a highly responsive cultivare0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“a good resistance inducer should be applied on a highly responsive cultivar in order to maximize the effect of the biocontrol agent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2299–2430 · show in text ↑

acibenzolar-S-methyl · disease · VitisResults differ

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

inoculation · molecular: expression · VitisPositive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.