Paper · 2001

Nitrate Reductase Activity in ipt-Expressing Tobacco.

Matej Lexa; Todor Genkov; Břetislav Brzobohatý

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Using a novel system for expressing ipt gene in tobacco, we were able to increase cytokinins in plant tissue. This enabled us to study new regulatory aspects of nitrate (NO3-) reduction. We have grown plants with elevated cytokinins on MS with variable NO3- and benzyladenine (BA). We determined nitrate reductase activity (NRA) in this plant material. Initially, we found that ipt-expressing plants always display lower NRA than wild-type SR1 plants. We also found that long-term exposure of tobacco to cytokinins caused up to 60% decrease in NRA. However, addition of BA to N-starved plants caused induction of NRA to levels up to 100% higher than those before induction. In ipt-expressing plants this effect was only present if BA was administered together with NO3-. Exposure to 40mM NO3- caused up to 550% induction of NRA. This effect was always more pronounced in wild-type plants. We propose that regulation of NR by NO3- and cytokinins is a result of overlaying regulatory processes, with short-term ones having positive effect on NRA and those acting over extended periods having inhibitory effects on NRA.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ipt expression system increased cytokinin levels in tobacco tissue.

Treatment
expressing ipt genee0
Gene
ipt genee0
Outcome
cytokinins in plant tissuee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using a novel system for expressing ipt gene in tobacco, we were able to increase cytokinins in plant tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ipt-expressing tobacco plants consistently showed lower NRA than wild-type SR1.

Material
ipt-expressing plantse0
Outcome
NRAe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
wild-type SR1 plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ipt-expressing plants always display lower NRA than wild-type SR1 plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–450 · show in text ↑
e1

“ipt gene in tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long-term cytokinin exposure decreased tobacco NRA by up to 60%.

Treatment
long-term exposure of tobacco to cytokininse0
Outcome
NRAe0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“long-term exposure of tobacco to cytokinins caused up to 60% decrease in NRA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–547 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BA addition induced NRA in nitrogen-starved tobacco by up to 100% above pre-induction levels.

Treatment
addition of BA to N-starved plantse0
Outcome
NRAe0
Direction
highere0
Value
100%e0
Comparator
those before inductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“addition of BA to N-starved plants caused induction of NRA to levels up to 100% higher than those before induction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–672 · show in text ↑
e1

“tobacco to cytokinins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–514 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BA induced NRA in ipt-expressing tobacco only when supplied with nitrate.

Material
ipt-expressing plantse0
Treatment
BA was administered together with NO3-e0
Outcome
this effect was only presente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In ipt-expressing plants this effect was only present if BA was administered together with NO3-”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–769 · show in text ↑
e1

“ipt gene in tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exposure to 40mM nitrate induced tobacco NRA by up to 550%.

Treatment
40mM NO3-e0
Outcome
NRAe0
Direction
inductione0
Value
550%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure to 40mM NO3- caused up to 550% induction of NRA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–827 · show in text ↑
e1

“ipt gene in tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate induction of NRA was stronger in wild-type tobacco than ipt-expressing plants.

Material
wild-type plantse0
Outcome
induction of NRAe1
Direction
more pronouncede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This effect was always more pronounced in wild-type plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–887 · show in text ↑
e1

“Exposure to 40mM NO3- caused up to 550% induction of NRA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–827 · show in text ↑
e2

“ipt gene in tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–55 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmixedbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose that short-term nitrate and cytokinin regulation positively affects NRA while prolonged processes inhibit it.

Outcome
NRAe0
Qualifier
overlaying regulatory processese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“regulation of NR by NO3- and cytokinins is a result of overlaying regulatory processes, with short-term ones having positive effect on NRA and those acting over extended periods having inhibitory effects on NRA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1115 · show in text ↑
e1

“ipt gene in tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–55 · show in text ↑

N-benzyladenine · physiology: enzyme activity · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

class · physiology: enzyme activity · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.