Paper · 2016 · Progressive Horticulture

Effect of irrigation and fertigation on cabbage with or without mulch

Kavita Sinha; B.D. Narzary

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out in the at Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat during the year 2012–2013 to study the effect of irrigation and fertigation on cabbage with or without mulch. The experiment was conducted in randomised block design with three replications. The treatment comprised of three level of irrigation viz., 100, 75, 50 percent OPE and three level of fertigation, viz., 100, 75, 50 percent RD of N and K based on recommended dose 120: 60: 60 kg ha-1. Phosphorus was applied as basal dose uniformly with or without mulch. 100% OPE, 100% RD of N and K with mulch recorded significantly the highest plant fresh weight (3.39 kg), head weight (3.03 kg), head diameter (22.00 cm), compactness (23.00) and yield (130.49 t ha-1). The minimum days (29.33) for head initiation and days to maturity (55) were recorded under 50% OPE, 50% RD of N and K with mulch treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined 100% OPE, 100% RD of N and K with mulch treatment gave the highest plant fresh weight.

Treatment
100% OPE, 100% RD of N and K with mulche0
Outcome
plant fresh weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.39 kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100% OPE, 100% RD of N and K with mulch recorded significantly the highest plant fresh weight (3.39 kg), head weight (3.03 kg), head diameter (22.00 cm), compactness (23.00) and yield (130.49 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–745 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined 100% OPE, 100% RD of N and K with mulch treatment gave the highest head weight.

Treatment
100% OPE, 100% RD of N and K with mulche0
Outcome
head weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.03 kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100% OPE, 100% RD of N and K with mulch recorded significantly the highest plant fresh weight (3.39 kg), head weight (3.03 kg), head diameter (22.00 cm), compactness (23.00) and yield (130.49 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–745 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined 100% OPE, 100% RD of N and K with mulch treatment gave the highest head diameter.

Treatment
100% OPE, 100% RD of N and K with mulche0
Outcome
head diametere0
Direction
higheste0
Value
22.00 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100% OPE, 100% RD of N and K with mulch recorded significantly the highest plant fresh weight (3.39 kg), head weight (3.03 kg), head diameter (22.00 cm), compactness (23.00) and yield (130.49 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–745 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined 100% OPE, 100% RD of N and K with mulch treatment gave the highest compactness.

Treatment
100% OPE, 100% RD of N and K with mulche0
Outcome
compactnesse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
23.00e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100% OPE, 100% RD of N and K with mulch recorded significantly the highest plant fresh weight (3.39 kg), head weight (3.03 kg), head diameter (22.00 cm), compactness (23.00) and yield (130.49 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–745 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined 100% OPE, 100% RD of N and K with mulch treatment gave the highest yield.

Treatment
100% OPE, 100% RD of N and K with mulche0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
130.49 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100% OPE, 100% RD of N and K with mulch recorded significantly the highest plant fresh weight (3.39 kg), head weight (3.03 kg), head diameter (22.00 cm), compactness (23.00) and yield (130.49 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–745 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% OPE, 50% RD of N and K with mulch treatment gave the minimum time to head initiation.

Treatment
50% OPE, 50% RD of N and K with mulche0
Outcome
days (29.33) for head initiatione0
Direction
minimume0
Value
29.33e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The minimum days (29.33) for head initiation and days to maturity (55) were recorded under 50% OPE, 50% RD of N and K with mulch treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–886 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% OPE, 50% RD of N and K with mulch treatment gave the minimum time to maturity.

Treatment
50% OPE, 50% RD of N and K with mulche0
Outcome
days to maturitye0
Direction
minimume0
Value
55e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The minimum days (29.33) for head initiation and days to maturity (55) were recorded under 50% OPE, 50% RD of N and K with mulch treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–886 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–47 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ

61 papers: 49 positive, 12 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ

164 papers: 144 positive, 20 negative or no effect

143 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

160 papers more in this group

See all 164 papers →

nitrogen · phenology · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

mulching · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

potassium · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 30 positive, 5 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 90 positive, 13 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

mulching · phenology · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

potassium · phenology · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.