Paper · 2017 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Response of 2A Clone grape to GA3 sprays for berry thinning as influenced by cane regulation on two training systems under tropical conditions

S.D. Shikhamany; Sanjay K. Jeughale; Kailas N. Khapre

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

With an aim to minimize manual thinning in 2A Clone of ‘Thompson Seedless’ grapevine trained on bower and extended Y trellis and grafted on “Dogridge” rootstock, investigations were carried out in growers’ vineyards around Nashik, Maharashtra during 2013–14. Gibberellic acid (GA3) was sprayed at 10 ppm thrice or 15 ppm twice. Since the response to GA3 for berry thinning is stage specific, attempts were made to induce uniform bud break by retaining the canes of uniform diameter, consequently achieve uniformity in the stage of panicles that is ideal for GA3 sprays. Efficacy of GA3 sprays in reducing the cluster compactness on different training systems (bower or extended Y trellis) and with cane regulation was assessed. Less cane diameter but more uniform bud break was observed on extended Y trellis and cane regulated vines. Uniformity in the stage of panicle was not influenced by either the training system or cane regulation. Clusters were less compact in spite of the larger berries on Y trellis with two sprays of GA3 @ 15 ppm. Although this combination was highly effective in reducing the cluster compactness, clusters in all the treatments were in the range of loose to wellfilled. Cane regulation coupled with two sprays of GA3 @ 15 ppm or retention of all canes coupled with three sprays @ 10 ppm resulted in more yield. These interactions were more pronounced on bower. Total soluble solids content and berry specific gravity were more on extended Y trellis while the titratable acids content was less on this trellis in cane-regulated vines. Taking cluster compactness, yield and quality into consideration, two sprays of GA3 at 15 ppm on extended Y trellis but three sprays @ 10 ppm on bower, with or without cane regulation were found best.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two sprays of GA3 at 15 ppm made grape clusters less compact on the Y trellis.

Taxon
grapet0
Material
2A Clonet0
Treatment
two sprays of GA3 @ 15 ppme1
Outcome
Clusterse1
Direction
less compacte1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“2A Clone grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“Clusters were less compact in spite of the larger berries on Y trellis with two sprays of GA3 @ 15 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1041 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cane regulation with two sprays of GA3 at 15 ppm resulted in more yield in grape.

Taxon
grapet0
Material
2A Clonet0
Treatment
Cane regulation coupled with two sprays of GA3 @ 15 ppme2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
moree2
Qualifier
more pronounced on bowere3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“2A Clone grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–26 · show in text ↑
e2

“Cane regulation coupled with two sprays of GA3 @ 15 ppm or retention of all canes coupled with three sprays @ 10 ppm resulted in more yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1339 · show in text ↑
e3

“These interactions were more pronounced on bower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1389 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Retention of all canes with three sprays of GA3 at 10 ppm resulted in more yield in grape.

Taxon
grapet0
Material
2A Clonet0
Treatment
retention of all canes coupled with three sprays @ 10 ppme2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
moree2
Qualifier
more pronounced on bowere3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“2A Clone grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–26 · show in text ↑
e2

“Cane regulation coupled with two sprays of GA3 @ 15 ppm or retention of all canes coupled with three sprays @ 10 ppm resulted in more yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1339 · show in text ↑
e3

“These interactions were more pronounced on bower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1389 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total soluble solids content and berry specific gravity were higher on the extended Y trellis in grape.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
extended Y trellise4
Outcome
Total soluble solids content and berry specific gravitye4
Direction
moree4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“2A Clone grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–26 · show in text ↑
e4

“Total soluble solids content and berry specific gravity were more on extended Y trellis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1478 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Titratable acid content was lower in cane-regulated grape vines.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
cane-regulated vinese5
Outcome
titratable acids contente5
Direction
lesse5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“2A Clone grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–26 · show in text ↑
e5

“the titratable acids content was less on this trellis in cane-regulated vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1562 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Two sprays of GA3 at 15 ppm on extended Y trellis were found best for grape.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
two sprays of GA3 at 15 ppm on extended Y trellise6
Outcome
found beste6

Verbatim

t0

“2A Clone grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–26 · show in text ↑
e6

“two sprays of GA3 at 15 ppm on extended Y trellis but three sprays @ 10 ppm on bower, with or without cane regulation were found best”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1763 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Three sprays of GA3 at 10 ppm on bower were found best for grape.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
three sprays @ 10 ppm on bowere6
Outcome
found beste6

Verbatim

t0

“2A Clone grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–26 · show in text ↑
e6

“two sprays of GA3 at 15 ppm on extended Y trellis but three sprays @ 10 ppm on bower, with or without cane regulation were found best”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1763 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · molecular: metabolites · VitisResults differ

30 papers: 23 positive, 7 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Gibberellic acid · yield · VitisResults differ

47 papers: 39 positive, 8 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results

51 papers: 46 positive, 5 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

application · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

87 papers: 80 positive, 7 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

83 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.