Paper · 2017 · Agronomy Journal

Compost Legacy Down‐Regulates Biological Nitrogen Fixation in a Long‐Term Field Experiment

Sieg Snapp; Brook Wilke; Lowell E. Gentry; et al.

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Core Ideas Compost‐based management enhanced soil organic matter in a Michigan Alfisol. Nitrogen fixation rates in soybean and red clover varied with management history. Weather markedly influenced the quantity of N fixed in three crop systems. Soil labile pool influence on N fixation can act as an internal regulator. Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) is a fundamental process relied on in agriculture, yet few field studies have examined regulation through soil inorganic N feedbacks or considered seasonal effects. In a Michigan long‐term field experiment we examined soil labile C and N pools and impact on BNF in two species, over multiple years. The 15 N natural abundance method was used to quantify BNF, with nodulated and non‐nodulated soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] isolines and red clover ( Trifolium pratense L.). Soil organic C status of plots was consistent with a gradient established through historical inputs: 0.8% (fertilizer management) to 0.9% (+ cover crop) to 1.2% (+ compost + cover crop). The fraction of nitrogen derived from atmosphere (fNdfa) in red clover and soybean over 3 yr was 61 to 58% with compost management, and 71 to 72% with fertilizer. This represented a downregulation of 19% (red clover) and 15% (soybean) in compost and cover crop managed plots, relative to inorganic fertilizer. In addition to management effects, we found that weather markedly influenced the total amount of N fixation over the 3 yr of the study. A mesic season supported vigorous soybean growth and 195 kg N ha −1 BNF, compared to 95 and 90 kg N ha −1 BNF in a dry and an excessively wet season. This study found that compost‐based management increased pools of labile C and N that internally downregulated BNF, while enhancing soybean yield compared to conventional management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Historical compost and cover crop inputs increased soil organic carbon to 1.2% versus 0.8% under fertilizer management.

Treatment
+ compost + cover crope0
Outcome
Soil organic C statuse0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
1.2%e0
Qualifier
0.8%e0
Comparator
fertilizer managemente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Soil organic C status of plots was consistent with a gradient established through historical inputs: 0.8% (fertilizer management) to 0.9% (+ cover crop) to 1.2% (+ compost + cover crop)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–1016 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost management reduced the red clover atmospheric nitrogen fraction by 19% relative to inorganic fertilizer.

Taxon
red cloverTrifolium pratensee0
Treatment
compost and cover crop managed plotse0
Outcome
downregulatione0
Direction
downregulatione0
Value
19%e0
Comparator
inorganic fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium pratense
Trifolium pratense · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This represented a downregulation of 19% (red clover) and 15% (soybean) in compost and cover crop managed plots, relative to inorganic fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost management reduced the soybean atmospheric nitrogen fraction by 15% relative to inorganic fertilizer.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
compost and cover crop managed plotse0
Outcome
downregulatione0
Direction
downregulatione0
Value
15%e0
Comparator
inorganic fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This represented a downregulation of 19% (red clover) and 15% (soybean) in compost and cover crop managed plots, relative to inorganic fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1326 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weather markedly influenced nitrogen fixation across three years.

Outcome
total amount of N fixatione0
Qualifier
over the 3 yr of the studye0

Not reportedTaxonSettingDirection

Verbatim

e0

“weather markedly influenced the total amount of N fixation over the 3 yr of the study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1462 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A mesic season supported 195 kg N ha −1 soybean nitrogen fixation, versus 95 in a dry season and 90 in an excessively wet season.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
BNFe0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
195 kg N ha −1e0
Qualifier
95 and 90 kg N ha −1 BNFe0
Comparator
a dry and an excessively wet seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A mesic season supported vigorous soybean growth and 195 kg N ha −1 BNF, compared to 95 and 90 kg N ha −1 BNF in a dry and an excessively wet season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1612 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost management enhanced soybean yield compared with conventional management.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
compost‐based managemente0
Outcome
soybean yielde0
Direction
enhancinge0
Comparator
conventional managemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compost‐based management increased pools of labile C and N that internally downregulated BNF, while enhancing soybean yield compared to conventional management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1636–1795 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost management increased labile C and N pools that downregulated nitrogen fixation.

Treatment
compost‐based managemente0
Outcome
BNFe0
Qualifier
increased pools of labile C and Ne0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“compost‐based management increased pools of labile C and N that internally downregulated BNF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1636–1728 · show in text ↑

fertilization · molecular: expression · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

1,192 papers: 1,021 positive, 171 negative or no effect

1,020 papers in the same direction as this paper · 155 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1,188 papers more in this group

See all 1,192 papers →

fertilization · molecular: expression · Trifolium pratense (red clover)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.