Paper · 1986 · Journal of Environmental Horticulture

Root Regeneration, Starch Content, and Root Promoting Activity in Tilia cordata Cultivars at Three Different Digging-Planting Times

Wm. Robert Witherspoon; Glen P. Lumis

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Three-year-old, 250 cm (8 ft) bareroot-dug Tilia cordata cultivars were planted at three different digging-planting times: (1) fall-dug and fall-planted, (2) fall-dug and spring-planted following winter storage, and (3) spring-dug and spring-planted. Fall-dug, fall-planted trees had a significantly higher number of new roots initiated than trees from either of the other two digging-planting times. Differences in root starch content were not significant enough to account for the reduced amounts of root regeneration in the two spring-planted groups. Extracts from cut root tips of spring-dug, spring-planted trees had the greatest ability to promote rooting of mung bean cuttings. This result did not correspond to the actual field performance of the trees. Other factors that may have influenced the root regeneration of spring-planted trees are discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall-dug, fall-planted trees initiated significantly more new roots than either spring-planted group.

Taxon
Tilia cordataTilia cordatat0
Treatment
Fall-dug, fall-plantede0
Outcome
number of new roots initiatede0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
either of the other two digging-planting timese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tilia cordata
Tilia cordata · TaxonImreKiss · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fall-dug, fall-planted trees had a significantly higher number of new roots initiated than trees from either of the other two digging-planting times.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–400 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tilia cordata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root starch differences were not significant enough to explain reduced regeneration in spring-planted trees.

Taxon
Tilia cordataTilia cordatat0
Outcome
root starch contente0
Direction
not significant enoughe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tilia cordata
Tilia cordata · TaxonImreKiss · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences in root starch content were not significant enough to account for the reduced amounts of root regeneration in the two spring-planted groups.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–553 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tilia cordata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring-dug, spring-planted root tip extracts promoted mung bean cutting rooting most strongly.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
Extracts from cut root tips of spring-dug, spring-planted treese0
Outcome
rooting of mung bean cuttingse0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Extracts from cut root tips of spring-dug, spring-planted trees had the greatest ability to promote rooting of mung bean cuttings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–684 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root-promoting extract activity did not correspond to field performance of Tilia trees.

Taxon
Tilia cordataTilia cordatat0
Outcome
did not correspond to the actual field performancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tilia cordata
Tilia cordata · TaxonImreKiss · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This result did not correspond to the actual field performance of the trees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–761 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tilia cordata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–79 · show in text ↑

sowing time · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

botanical · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 59 positive, 43 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.