Abstract
Three-year-old, 250 cm (8 ft) bareroot-dug Tilia cordata cultivars were planted at three different digging-planting times: (1) fall-dug and fall-planted, (2) fall-dug and spring-planted following winter storage, and (3) spring-dug and spring-planted. Fall-dug, fall-planted trees had a significantly higher number of new roots initiated than trees from either of the other two digging-planting times. Differences in root starch content were not significant enough to account for the reduced amounts of root regeneration in the two spring-planted groups. Extracts from cut root tips of spring-dug, spring-planted trees had the greatest ability to promote rooting of mung bean cuttings. This result did not correspond to the actual field performance of the trees. Other factors that may have influenced the root regeneration of spring-planted trees are discussed.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Fall-dug, fall-planted trees initiated significantly more new roots than either spring-planted group.
- Taxon
- Tilia cordata
Tilia cordatat0 - Treatment
- Fall-dug, fall-plantede0
- Outcome
- number of new roots initiatede0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- either of the other two digging-planting timese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Fall-dug, fall-planted trees had a significantly higher number of new roots initiated than trees from either of the other two digging-planting times.”
t0“Tilia cordata”
Claim · model-written summary
Root starch differences were not significant enough to explain reduced regeneration in spring-planted trees.
- Taxon
- Tilia cordata
Tilia cordatat0 - Outcome
- root starch contente0
- Direction
- not significant enoughe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Differences in root starch content were not significant enough to account for the reduced amounts of root regeneration in the two spring-planted groups.”
t0“Tilia cordata”
Claim · model-written summary
Spring-dug, spring-planted root tip extracts promoted mung bean cutting rooting most strongly.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatae0 - Treatment
- Extracts from cut root tips of spring-dug, spring-planted treese0
- Outcome
- rooting of mung bean cuttingse0
- Direction
- greateste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Extracts from cut root tips of spring-dug, spring-planted trees had the greatest ability to promote rooting of mung bean cuttings.”
Claim · model-written summary
Root-promoting extract activity did not correspond to field performance of Tilia trees.
- Taxon
- Tilia cordata
Tilia cordatat0 - Outcome
- did not correspond to the actual field performancee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“This result did not correspond to the actual field performance of the trees.”
t0“Tilia cordata”
The same questions in other papers
sowing time · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →botanical · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
98 papers more in this group
See all 102 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.