Paper · 2017 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Climate change impacts modeling on winter wheat yield under full and deficit irrigation in Myandoab-Iran

Nasrin Azad; Javad Behmanesh; Vahid Rezaverdinejad; et al.

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
36
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this research, impact of climate change on wheat yield was simulated using SWAP in Myandoab, Iran. Field data of wheat in 2004–2005 and 2005–2006 periods were used for calibration and validation of the SWAP, respectively. The HadCM3 outputs, for A1B, A2 and B1 scenarios and 2046–2065 periods, were used in SWAP and wheat yield in mentioned period was compared with base period. Three irrigation levels, based on meeting 100, 70 and 50% of the crop ET demand, were used to study the climate change effects on wheat yield in full and deficit irrigation conditions. The results showed that temperature and reference evapotranspiration will increase in 2055s. Temperature increase cause to decrease crop growing period and crop evapotranspiration. The results showed that the negative impact of temperature increase has dominated to the positive impact of CO2 concentration and the yield is reduced. For full irrigation situation, the reduction will be 24.1, 22.4 and 20.8% in A1B, A2 and B1, respectively. Reduction in yield can be related to the shorter maturity period of the crop. The results showed that under deficit irrigation, the yield is also decreased but this decrease rate of yield is higher in full irrigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature and reference evapotranspiration are projected to increase in the 2055s for wheat at Myandoab.

Outcome
temperature and reference evapotranspiratione2
Qualifier
will increase in 2055se2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“impact of climate change on wheat yield was simulated using SWAP in Myandoab, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–100 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results showed that temperature and reference evapotranspiration will increase in 2055s”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–658 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature increase is projected to decrease the crop growing period and crop evapotranspiration of wheat.

Treatment
Temperature increasee3
Outcome
crop growing period and crop evapotranspiratione3
Direction
decreasee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“impact of climate change on wheat yield was simulated using SWAP in Myandoab, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–100 · show in text ↑
e3

“Temperature increase cause to decrease crop growing period and crop evapotranspiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–746 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

The negative impact of temperature increase dominates the positive impact of CO2 concentration, so the wheat yield is reduced.

Treatment
temperature increasee4
Outcome
the yield is reducede4
Direction
reducede4
Qualifier
the positive impact of CO2 concentratione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“impact of climate change on wheat yield was simulated using SWAP in Myandoab, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–100 · show in text ↑
e4

“the negative impact of temperature increase has dominated to the positive impact of CO2 concentration and the yield is reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–898 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Under full irrigation, the projected wheat yield reduction in the A1B scenario is 24.1 for 2046-2065.

Treatment
full irrigatione6
Outcome
wheat yielde5
Direction
reductione6
Value
24.1e6
Qualifier
A1Be6
Comparator
base periode5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“impact of climate change on wheat yield was simulated using SWAP in Myandoab, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–100 · show in text ↑
e5

“wheat yield in mentioned period was compared with base period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–380 · show in text ↑
e6

“For full irrigation situation, the reduction will be 24.1, 22.4 and 20.8% in A1B, A2 and B1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1005 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Under full irrigation, the projected wheat yield reduction in the A2 scenario is 22.4 for 2046-2065.

Treatment
full irrigatione6
Outcome
wheat yielde5
Direction
reductione6
Value
22.4e6
Qualifier
A2e6
Comparator
base periode5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“impact of climate change on wheat yield was simulated using SWAP in Myandoab, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–100 · show in text ↑
e5

“wheat yield in mentioned period was compared with base period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–380 · show in text ↑
e6

“For full irrigation situation, the reduction will be 24.1, 22.4 and 20.8% in A1B, A2 and B1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1005 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Under full irrigation, the projected wheat yield reduction in the B1 scenario is 20.8% for 2046-2065.

Treatment
full irrigatione6
Outcome
wheat yielde5
Direction
reductione6
Value
20.8%e6
Qualifier
B1e6
Comparator
base periode5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“impact of climate change on wheat yield was simulated using SWAP in Myandoab, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–100 · show in text ↑
e5

“wheat yield in mentioned period was compared with base period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–380 · show in text ↑
e6

“For full irrigation situation, the reduction will be 24.1, 22.4 and 20.8% in A1B, A2 and B1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1005 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Under deficit irrigation, the projected wheat yield is also decreased.

Treatment
deficit irrigatione7
Outcome
yielde7
Direction
decreasede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“impact of climate change on wheat yield was simulated using SWAP in Myandoab, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–100 · show in text ↑
e7

“under deficit irrigation, the yield is also decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1162 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

The rate of wheat yield decrease is higher under full irrigation than under deficit irrigation.

Treatment
full irrigatione0
Outcome
decrease rate of yielde0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“impact of climate change on wheat yield was simulated using SWAP in Myandoab, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“this decrease rate of yield is higher in full irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1223 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest the wheat yield reduction may be related to the shorter maturity period of the crop.

Outcome
Reduction in yielde0
Qualifier
shorter maturity periode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“impact of climate change on wheat yield was simulated using SWAP in Myandoab, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“Reduction in yield can be related to the shorter maturity period of the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1083 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

190 papers in the same direction as this paper · 798 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.