Abstract
A study was initiated near Garden City, KS, in fall of 2015 and spring of 2016 comparing the weed control of several herbicide treatments and their time of application for kochia control in fallow. All herbicide treatments applied in December 2015 provided 99 or 100% kochia control in early spring. However, control declined to less than 60% with these treatments by June 8, 2016. Spring-applied herbicides were generally more efficacious than winter-applied herbicides on June 8, with the best control from treatments of Clarity (dicamba) plus atrazine with or without Zidua (pyroxasulfone) (88 to 89%).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Herbicide treatments applied in December 2015 provided 99 or 100% kochia control in early spring.
- Treatment
- All herbicide treatments applied in December 2015e1
- Outcome
- kochia control in early springe1
- Value
- 99 or 100%e1
BassiaOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“All herbicide treatments applied in December 2015 provided 99 or 100% kochia control in early spring”
Claim · model-written summary
Control of kochia by the December 2015 herbicide treatments declined to below 60% by June 8, 2016.
- Treatment
- All herbicide treatments applied in December 2015e1
- Outcome
- controle2
- Direction
- declinede2
- Value
- less than 60%e2
- Qualifier
- by June 8, 2016e2
- Comparator
- 99 or 100% kochia control in early springe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“All herbicide treatments applied in December 2015 provided 99 or 100% kochia control in early spring”
e2“control declined to less than 60% with these treatments by June 8, 2016”
Claim · model-written summary
Spring-applied herbicides were generally more efficacious for kochia control than winter-applied herbicides on June 8.
- Treatment
- Spring-applied herbicidese1
- Outcome
- controle1
- Direction
- more efficaciouse1
- Qualifier
- on June 8e1
- Comparator
- winter-applied herbicidese1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Kochia Control in Fallow”
e1“Spring-applied herbicides were generally more efficacious than winter-applied herbicides on June 8, with the best control from treatments of Clarity (dicamba) plus atrazine with or without Zidua (pyroxasulfone) (88 to 89%)”
Claim · model-written summary
The best kochia control on June 8 came from Clarity plus atrazine with or without Zidua, at 88 to 89%.
- Treatment
- Clarity (dicamba) plus atrazine with or without Zidua (pyroxasulfone)e1
- Outcome
- best controle1
- Direction
- beste1
- Value
- 88 to 89%e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Kochia Control in Fallow”
e1“Spring-applied herbicides were generally more efficacious than winter-applied herbicides on June 8, with the best control from treatments of Clarity (dicamba) plus atrazine with or without Zidua (pyroxasulfone) (88 to 89%)”
The same questions in other papers
atrazine · control · BassiaPositive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →dicamba · control · BassiaPositive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →herbicide · control · BassiaPositive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.