Paper · 2017 · Journal of AgriSearch

Evaluation of Fertilizer potential of sea weed (Kappaphycus and Gracilaria) saps in potato crop in North Eastern hill region of India: Evaluation of Fertilizer Potential of Sea Weed Saps in Potato Crop

S. K. Yadav; S. S. Lal; T. K. Bag; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during summer season of 2013 at Central Potato Research Station, Shillong, Meghalaya to study the effect of sea weed saps on growth and productivity of potato in the north eastern hill region of India. The trial was laid out in randomized block design, replicated thrice, with 10 treatments. The number of shoot per plant was found to be non significant and vary from 2.8 to 3.0. The maximum plant at harvest was recorded under application 7.5 Kappaphycus Spray + 100% RDF while lowest under 6.25% + 50% RDF. Maximum small size tuber was found with application of 10 % Gracilaria spray + RDF which was at par to 2.5 % Kappaphycus spray + RDF and 7.5 % Gracilaria spray + RDF but significantly superior to other treatment. However, the highest medium size tube of potato was noticed under 6.25% Kappaphycus spray along with 50% recommended dose of fertilizer. Highest large size tuber was recorded with application of 5% Kappaphycus spray + RDF followed by 2.5% Kappaphycus spray along with RDF as well as 7.5 % Gracilaria spray + RDF which was at par but significantly superior to rest of treatment. Application of 2.5% Kappaphycus spray + 100% RDF recorded the highest productivity of potato (27.1 t/ha) followed by 100% RDF + Kappaphycus spray @ 5.0% (26.6 t/ha) which were at par to each other but significantly superior to the rest of treatment. Based on the economic yield of potato, it may be concluded that the application of 2.5 % Kappaphycus spray + 100% RDF was found to be more profitable under rainfed condition of Meghalaya.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot number did not differ significantly among treatments and ranged from 2.8 to 3.0.

Outcome
number of shoot per plante0
Value
2.8 to 3.0e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of shoot per plant was found to be non significant and vary from 2.8 to 3.0.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–412 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant count at harvest was greatest under 7.5 Kappaphycus Spray + 100% RDF and lowest under 6.25% + 50% RDF.

Treatment
7.5 Kappaphycus Spray + 100% RDFe0
Outcome
plant at harveste0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
6.25% + 50% RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum plant at harvest was recorded under application 7.5 Kappaphycus Spray + 100% RDF while lowest under 6.25% + 50% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–541 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Small tubers were most numerous under 10 % Gracilaria spray + RDF, equal to two other sprays and above other treatments.

Treatment
10 % Gracilaria spray + RDFe0
Outcome
small size tubere0
Direction
Maximume0
Qualifier
at par to 2.5 % Kappaphycus spray + RDF and 7.5 % Gracilaria spray + RDFe0
Comparator
other treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum small size tuber was found with application of 10 % Gracilaria spray + RDF which was at par to 2.5 % Kappaphycus spray + RDF and 7.5 % Gracilaria spray + RDF but significantly superior to other treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–754 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium tubers were highest under 6.25% Kappaphycus spray with 50% fertilizer.

Treatment
6.25% Kappaphycus spray along with 50% recommended dose of fertilizere0
Outcome
medium size tube of potatoe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest medium size tube of potato was noticed under 6.25% Kappaphycus spray along with 50% recommended dose of fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–891 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Large tubers were highest under 5% Kappaphycus spray + RDF, equal to two other sprays and above the remaining treatments.

Treatment
5% Kappaphycus spray + RDFe0
Outcome
large size tubere0
Direction
Higheste0
Qualifier
2.5% Kappaphycus spray along with RDF as well as 7.5 % Gracilaria spray + RDF which was at pare0
Comparator
rest of treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest large size tuber was recorded with application of 5% Kappaphycus spray + RDF followed by 2.5% Kappaphycus spray along with RDF as well as 7.5 % Gracilaria spray + RDF which was at par but significantly superior to rest of treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1132 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato productivity was highest at 27.1 t/ha with 2.5% Kappaphycus spray + 100% RDF.

Treatment
2.5% Kappaphycus spray + 100% RDFe0
Outcome
productivity of potatoe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
27.1 t/hae0
Comparator
rest of treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 2.5% Kappaphycus spray + 100% RDF recorded the highest productivity of potato (27.1 t/ha) followed by 100% RDF + Kappaphycus spray @ 5.0% (26.6 t/ha) which were at par to each other but significantly superior to the rest of treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato productivity with 5.0% Kappaphycus spray + full RDF was 26.6 t/ha, statistically equal to the 2.5% treatment and superior to remaining treatments.

Treatment
100% RDF + Kappaphycus spray @ 5.0%e0
Outcome
productivity of potatoe0
Direction
superiore0
Value
26.6 t/hae0
Qualifier
at par to each othere0
Comparator
rest of treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 2.5% Kappaphycus spray + 100% RDF recorded the highest productivity of potato (27.1 t/ha) followed by 100% RDF + Kappaphycus spray @ 5.0% (26.6 t/ha) which were at par to each other but significantly superior to the rest of treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1382 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded 2.5 % Kappaphycus spray + 100% RDF was more profitable under rainfed Meghalaya conditions.

Treatment
2.5 % Kappaphycus spray + 100% RDFe0
Outcome
more profitablee0
Setting
Meghalayae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of 2.5 % Kappaphycus spray + 100% RDF was found to be more profitable under rainfed condition of Meghalaya.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1447–1570 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–95 · show in text ↑

Kappaphycus · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 71 positive, 7 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

fertilization · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

140 papers: 122 positive, 18 negative or no effect

121 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

136 papers more in this group

See all 140 papers →

application · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

191 papers: 177 positive, 14 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

187 papers more in this group

See all 191 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

450 papers: 394 positive, 56 negative or no effect

393 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

446 papers more in this group

See all 450 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.