Paper · 2017 · Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Science

PHENOTYPIC PERFORMANCE OF CIHERANG SUB1 NEAR ISOGENIC LINE AS AN ADAPTIVE VARIETY FOR FLOODING CONDITIONS

Yudhistira Nugraha; Nurul Hidayatun; Trisnaningsih Trisnaningsih; et al.

10
claims
16
verbatim quotes
11
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Marker assisted back crossing (MABC) is a molecular tool that can help breeders in reducing backcrossed generation. However, effectiveness of this method still needs further approval using actual phenotypic performances. The International Rice Research Institute had developed Ciherang near isogenic line (NIL) of submergence tolerance, Sub1. The study aimed to evaluate phenotypic performances of Ciherang Sub1 NIL in the greenhouse and field conditions. The study was conducted in ten locations using five submergence-tolerant varieties and a control treatment under normal conditions. The results showed that the average grain yields and some agronomic traits of Ciherang Sub1 were not significantly different compared with those of Ciherang (recurrent parent). However, under 10- and 15-days of submergence. Ciherang Sub1 was significantly different to Ciherang. The survival rate of Ciherang Sub1 was higher than Ciherang after 14-days submerged in the greenhouse tank experiment. Response of Ciherang Sub1 to brown planthopper biotype 1, 2 and 3, Xanthomonas oryzae pathotype III, IV and VIII, and rice tungro virus inocula from Subang, Magelang and Lanrang were also comparable with its recurrent parent. Quality and physico-chemical properties of rice (milled rice) of Ciherang Sub1 were not different with those of Ciherang. Similarity level of phenotypic traits of Ciherang Sub1 compared to Ciherang was more than 87.5%. This finding proved that a single backcross method can produce progeny identic with its parent. This MABC line can be recommended to farmers in flood-prone area where the Ciherang is preferred.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ciherang Sub1 grain yield and agronomic traits did not differ significantly from Ciherang.

Material
Ciherang Sub1e0
Outcome
average grain yields and some agronomic traitse0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
Ciherange0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the average grain yields and some agronomic traits of Ciherang Sub1 were not significantly different compared with those of Ciherang (recurrent parent).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–764 · show in text ↑
e1

“Quality and physico-chemical properties of rice (milled rice) of Ciherang Sub1 were not different with those of Ciherang.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under 10- and 15-day submergence, Ciherang Sub1 differed significantly from Ciherang, with no endpoint specified.

Material
Ciherang Sub1e0
Treatment
10- and 15-days of submergencee0
Outcome
significantly differente0
Comparator
Ciherange0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, under 10- and 15-days of submergence. Ciherang Sub1 was significantly different to Ciherang.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–866 · show in text ↑
e1

“Quality and physico-chemical properties of rice (milled rice) of Ciherang Sub1 were not different with those of Ciherang.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ciherang Sub1 had higher survival than Ciherang after 14-day greenhouse submergence.

Material
Ciherang Sub1e0
Treatment
14-days submergede0
Outcome
survival ratee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Ciherange0
Setting
greenhouse tank experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The survival rate of Ciherang Sub1 was higher than Ciherang after 14-days submerged in the greenhouse tank experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–985 · show in text ↑
e1

“Quality and physico-chemical properties of rice (milled rice) of Ciherang Sub1 were not different with those of Ciherang.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1333 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ciherang Sub1 responses to brown planthopper biotypes 1, 2 and 3 were comparable to its parent.

Material
Ciherang Sub1e0
Interactor
brown planthopperNilaparvata lugense0pest
Outcome
Responsee0
Direction
comparablee0
Qualifier
biotype 1, 2 and 3e0
Comparator
recurrent parente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nilaparvata lugens
Nilaparvata lugens · InteractorNatasha Wright, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org - See more at: http://www.forestryimages.org/browse/detail.cfm?imgnum=51900 · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Response of Ciherang Sub1 to brown planthopper biotype 1, 2 and 3, Xanthomonas oryzae pathotype III, IV and VIII, and rice tungro virus inocula from Subang, Magelang and Lanrang were also comparable with its recurrent parent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1211 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ciherang Sub1 responses to Xanthomonas oryzae pathotypes III, IV and VIII were comparable to its parent.

Material
Ciherang Sub1e0
Interactor
Xanthomonas oryzaeXanthomonas oryzaee0pathogen
Outcome
Responsee0
Direction
comparablee0
Qualifier
pathotype III, IV and VIIIe0
Comparator
recurrent parente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Response of Ciherang Sub1 to brown planthopper biotype 1, 2 and 3, Xanthomonas oryzae pathotype III, IV and VIII, and rice tungro virus inocula from Subang, Magelang and Lanrang were also comparable with its recurrent parent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1211 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ciherang Sub1 responses to rice tungro virus inocula were comparable to its parent.

Material
Ciherang Sub1e0
Interactor
rice tungro viruse0pathogen
Outcome
Responsee0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
recurrent parente0
Setting
Subang, Magelang and Lanrange0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Response of Ciherang Sub1 to brown planthopper biotype 1, 2 and 3, Xanthomonas oryzae pathotype III, IV and VIII, and rice tungro virus inocula from Subang, Magelang and Lanrang were also comparable with its recurrent parent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1211 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ciherang Sub1 milled rice quality and physicochemical properties did not differ from Ciherang.

Material
Ciherang Sub1e0
Organ / stage
milled ricee0
Outcome
Quality and physico-chemical propertiese0
Direction
not differente0
Comparator
Ciherange0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Quality and physico-chemical properties of rice (milled rice) of Ciherang Sub1 were not different with those of Ciherang.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1333 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ciherang Sub1 phenotypic similarity to Ciherang exceeded 87.5%.

Material
Ciherang Sub1e0
Outcome
Similarity level of phenotypic traitse0
Direction
more thane0
Value
87.5%e0
Comparator
Ciherange0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarity level of phenotypic traits of Ciherang Sub1 compared to Ciherang was more than 87.5%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1430 · show in text ↑
e1

“Quality and physico-chemical properties of rice (milled rice) of Ciherang Sub1 were not different with those of Ciherang.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1333 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that a single backcross can produce progeny identical to its parent.

Treatment
single backcross methode0
Outcome
progeny identic with its parente0
Comparator
parente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This finding proved that a single backcross method can produce progeny identic with its parent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1526 · show in text ↑
e1

“Quality and physico-chemical properties of rice (milled rice) of Ciherang Sub1 were not different with those of Ciherang.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1333 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The MABC line is recommended for farmers in flood-prone areas preferring Ciherang.

Outcome
MABC linee0
Qualifier
in flood-prone area where the Ciherang is preferrede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This MABC line can be recommended to farmers in flood-prone area where the Ciherang is preferred.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1624 · show in text ↑
e1

“Quality and physico-chemical properties of rice (milled rice) of Ciherang Sub1 were not different with those of Ciherang.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1333 · show in text ↑

flooding · survival · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.