Paper · 2017 · AGRICULTURE UPDATE

Effect of foliar spray of water soluble fertilizers on total dry matter production (g plant-1) nutrient uptake and economics in pigeonpea

C.M. MAMATHASHREE; M.B. PATIL; H.D. SHILPA

11
claims
33
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture, Bijapur, toknow the effect of foliar spray of water soluble fertilizers on growth and yield of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Mill sp.] Kharif, 2013-14. The experiment was laid out with twelve treatments replicated thrice in Randomized Block Design. The data on total dry matter production of pigeonpea at harvest stage as influenced by foliar spray of water soluble fertilizers. Water soluble fertilizers had significant influences on total dry matter production at harvest.Significantly higher total dry matter production was recorded with the application of water soluble fertilizer 19:19:19 at 2% (142.7 g plant -1 ) compared to all other treatments, except the foliar spray of 0:52:34 at 2% (129.1 g plant -1 ). The lower total dry matter production was recorded in control (86.2 g plant -1 ) compared to other treatments. foliar spray of 0:52:34 at 2% recorded higher uptake of nutrients (N, P and K) 128.3, 30.2, 45.3 kg ha -1 , respectively. Foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 2% recorded significantly higher net returns (Rs. 33,976 ha -1 ) and it was followed by foliar spray of 0:52:34 at 2% (Rs. 28,518.78 ha -1 ) Foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 2% recorded significantly higher B : C ratio (2.7) and it was on par with foliar spray of 0:52:34 @ 2% (2.5) and the least B : C ratio was recorded in foliar spray of 28:28:0 at 1% (1.7).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water soluble fertilizers significantly influenced total dry matter production of pigeonpea at harvest.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
water soluble fertilizerse2
Outcome
total dry matter productione2
Setting
College of Agriculture, Bijapure0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture, Bijapur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“effect of foliar spray of water soluble fertilizers on growth and yield of pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 82–166 · show in text ↑
e2

“Water soluble fertilizers had significant influences on total dry matter production at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–535 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray of water soluble fertilizer 19:19:19 at 2% gave significantly higher total dry matter (142.7 g plant -1) than all other treatments except foliar spray of 0:52:34 at 2%.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
application of water soluble fertilizer 19:19:19 at 2%e2
Outcome
total dry matter productione2
Direction
highere2
Value
142.7 g plant -1e2
Comparator
all other treatments, except the foliar spray of 0:52:34 at 2%e2
Setting
College of Agriculture, Bijapure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture, Bijapur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“effect of foliar spray of water soluble fertilizers on growth and yield of pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 82–166 · show in text ↑
e2

“Significantly higher total dry matter production was recorded with the application of water soluble fertilizer 19:19:19 at 2% (142.7 g plant -1 ) compared to all other treatments, except the foliar spray of 0:52:34 at 2% (129.1 g plant -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–776 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control plots had lower total dry matter (86.2 g plant -1) than other treatments.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
controle2
Outcome
total dry matter productione2
Direction
lowere2
Value
86.2 g plant -1e2
Comparator
other treatmentse2
Setting
College of Agriculture, Bijapure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture, Bijapur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“effect of foliar spray of water soluble fertilizers on growth and yield of pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 82–166 · show in text ↑
e2

“The lower total dry matter production was recorded in control (86.2 g plant -1 ) compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–887 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray of 0:52:34 at 2% increased N uptake of pigeonpea (128.3 kg ha-1).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
foliar spray of 0:52:34 at 2%e2
Outcome
uptake of nutrients (N, P and K)e2
Direction
highere2
Value
128.3e2
Setting
College of Agriculture, Bijapure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture, Bijapur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“effect of foliar spray of water soluble fertilizers on growth and yield of pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 82–166 · show in text ↑
e2

“foliar spray of 0:52:34 at 2% recorded higher uptake of nutrients (N, P and K) 128.3, 30.2, 45.3 kg ha -1 , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1009 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray of 0:52:34 at 2% increased P uptake of pigeonpea (30.2 kg ha-1).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
foliar spray of 0:52:34 at 2%e2
Outcome
uptake of nutrients (N, P and K)e2
Direction
highere2
Value
30.2e2
Setting
College of Agriculture, Bijapure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture, Bijapur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“effect of foliar spray of water soluble fertilizers on growth and yield of pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 82–166 · show in text ↑
e2

“foliar spray of 0:52:34 at 2% recorded higher uptake of nutrients (N, P and K) 128.3, 30.2, 45.3 kg ha -1 , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1009 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray of 0:52:34 at 2% increased K uptake of pigeonpea (45.3 kg ha-1).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
foliar spray of 0:52:34 at 2%e2
Outcome
uptake of nutrients (N, P and K)e2
Direction
highere2
Value
45.3e2
Setting
College of Agriculture, Bijapure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture, Bijapur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“effect of foliar spray of water soluble fertilizers on growth and yield of pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 82–166 · show in text ↑
e2

“foliar spray of 0:52:34 at 2% recorded higher uptake of nutrients (N, P and K) 128.3, 30.2, 45.3 kg ha -1 , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1009 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 2% gave significantly higher net returns (Rs. 33,976 ha-1).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
Foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 2%e2
Outcome
net returnse2
Direction
highere2
Value
Rs. 33,976 ha -1e2
Setting
College of Agriculture, Bijapure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture, Bijapur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“effect of foliar spray of water soluble fertilizers on growth and yield of pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 82–166 · show in text ↑
e2

“Foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 2% recorded significantly higher net returns (Rs. 33,976 ha -1 ) and it was followed by foliar spray of 0:52:34 at 2% (Rs. 28,518.78 ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray of 0:52:34 at 2% ranked second in net returns (Rs. 28,518.78 ha-1) after 19:19:19 at 2%.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
foliar spray of 0:52:34 at 2%e2
Outcome
net returnse2
Direction
followed bye2
Value
Rs. 28,518.78 ha -1e2
Setting
College of Agriculture, Bijapure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture, Bijapur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“effect of foliar spray of water soluble fertilizers on growth and yield of pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 82–166 · show in text ↑
e2

“Foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 2% recorded significantly higher net returns (Rs. 33,976 ha -1 ) and it was followed by foliar spray of 0:52:34 at 2% (Rs. 28,518.78 ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 2% gave significantly higher B:C ratio (2.7).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
Foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 2%e2
Outcome
B : C ratioe2
Direction
highere2
Value
2.7e2
Setting
College of Agriculture, Bijapure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture, Bijapur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“effect of foliar spray of water soluble fertilizers on growth and yield of pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 82–166 · show in text ↑
e2

“Foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 2% recorded significantly higher B : C ratio (2.7) and it was on par with foliar spray of 0:52:34 @ 2% (2.5) and the least B : C ratio was recorded in foliar spray of 28:28:0 at 1% (1.7)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1394 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray of 0:52:34 at 2% was on par with 19:19:19 at 2% in B:C ratio (2.5).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
foliar spray of 0:52:34 @ 2%e2
Outcome
B : C ratioe2
Direction
on par withe2
Value
2.5e2
Comparator
Foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 2%e2
Setting
College of Agriculture, Bijapure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture, Bijapur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“effect of foliar spray of water soluble fertilizers on growth and yield of pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 82–166 · show in text ↑
e2

“Foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 2% recorded significantly higher B : C ratio (2.7) and it was on par with foliar spray of 0:52:34 @ 2% (2.5) and the least B : C ratio was recorded in foliar spray of 28:28:0 at 1% (1.7)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1394 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray of 28:28:0 at 1% gave the least B:C ratio (1.7).

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
foliar spray of 28:28:0 at 1%e2
Outcome
B : C ratioe2
Direction
leaste2
Value
1.7e2
Setting
College of Agriculture, Bijapure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture, Bijapur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“effect of foliar spray of water soluble fertilizers on growth and yield of pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 82–166 · show in text ↑
e2

“Foliar spray of 19:19:19 at 2% recorded significantly higher B : C ratio (2.7) and it was on par with foliar spray of 0:52:34 @ 2% (2.5) and the least B : C ratio was recorded in foliar spray of 28:28:0 at 1% (1.7)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1394 · show in text ↑

application · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 87 positive, 6 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

89 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 159 positive, 7 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.