Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Food Science & Technology

Quality aspects of fresh‐cut ‘long‐storage tomato’ as affected by package, calcium chloride and storage time

Cristina Patanè; Angelo Malvuccio; Alessandro Saita; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary In this research, some quality changes during storage at 4 °C were assessed in fresh‐cut fruits of a ‘long‐storage tomato’ landrace, packaged in biocompostable materials ( PLA Ingeo tray/NatureFlex™ film) or in conventional plastics ( PET tray + polypropylene film). The effects of dipping in CaCl 2 on the shelf‐life extension were also assessed. Plants were cultivated both off‐season (greenhouse) and in‐season (open field). CO 2 and O 2 concentration, fruit weight loss, firmness, colour, microbial load were measured at 0, 4, 7, 12 days of storage. Headspace gas changes and fruit weight loss were minimised in conventional package. BIO package prevented water condensation, led to max 5% weight loss and made fruits less susceptible to spoilage. Dipping in CaCl 2 induced better firmness, especially in biopackage. Off‐season fruits had overall lower quality than in‐season fruits; however, these may contribute to extend the production season, with interesting marketing implications for the agri‐food industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional packaging minimized headspace gas changes and fruit weight loss.

Treatment
conventional packagee0
Outcome
Headspace gas changes and fruit weight losse0
Direction
minimisede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
e0

“Headspace gas changes and fruit weight loss were minimised in conventional package.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biocompostable packaging prevented water condensation.

Treatment
BIO packagee0
Outcome
water condensatione0
Direction
preventede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
e0

“BIO package prevented water condensation, led to max 5% weight loss and made fruits less susceptible to spoilage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biocompostable packaging led to at most 5% fruit weight loss.

Treatment
BIO packagee0
Outcome
weight losse0
Value
5%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
e0

“BIO package prevented water condensation, led to max 5% weight loss and made fruits less susceptible to spoilage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biocompostable packaging made fruits less susceptible to spoilage.

Treatment
BIO packagee0
Outcome
spoilagee0
Direction
less susceptiblee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
e0

“BIO package prevented water condensation, led to max 5% weight loss and made fruits less susceptible to spoilage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium chloride dipping improved firmness, especially in biopackaging.

Treatment
Dipping in CaCl 2e0
Outcome
firmnesse0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
especially in biopackagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
e0

“Dipping in CaCl 2 induced better firmness, especially in biopackage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–828 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Off-season fruits had lower overall quality than in-season fruits.

Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
in‐season fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
e0

“Off‐season fruits had overall lower quality than in‐season fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–894 · show in text ↑

calcium dichloride · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

application · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 51 positive, 10 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

158 papers: 141 positive, 17 negative or no effect

140 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

154 papers more in this group

See all 158 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.