Paper · 2017 · Current Agriculture Research Journal

Herbicidal Potential of Callistemon viminalis Essential Oil against Echinochloa crus-galli L., Amaranthus viridis and Phalaris minor

Gajendra Singh Vishwakarma; Shilpa Sharma; Sunil Mittal

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Experimental studies were carried out under invitro conditions to examine the effect of Callistemon viminalis essential oil (EO) against the Echinochloa crus-galli L., Amaranthus viridis and Phalaris minor. EO composition was analysed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, revealing that EO was rich in monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes like eucalyptol, D-limonene, α-terpineol and caryophyllene oxide. EO applied in the concentration range of 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 μl against Amaranthus viridis, Echinochloa crus-galli L. and Phalaris minor drastically affected the germination of all test plants and inhibited root and shoot development. Not only seedling growth, even the chlorophyll content also reduced appreciably. This led to the demonstration that Callistemon viminalis EO was negatively affecting the photosynthetic process. Upregulation of antioxidant enzymes activities indicated that these enzymes were providing protection against Callistemon viminalis EO induced stress. Amaranthus viridis was reported to be more sensitive in comparison to Echinochloa crus-galli L. and Phalaris minor.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The oil contained abundant monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes.

Taxon
Callistemon viminalisCallistemon viminalist0
Outcome
rich in monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes like eucalyptol, D-limonene, α-terpineol and caryophyllene oxidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Callistemon viminalis
Callistemon viminalis · TaxonPëter 1968 User:Peter Greenwell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“EO was rich in monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes like eucalyptol, D-limonene, α-terpineol and caryophyllene oxide.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–403 · show in text ↑
t0

“Callistemon viminalis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Callistemon oil impaired germination and root and shoot development of Amaranthus viridis.

Taxon
Amaranthus viridisAmaranthus viridise0
Treatment
EO applied in the concentration range of 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 μle0
Outcome
germination of all test plants and inhibited root and shoot developmente0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus viridis
Amaranthus viridis · TaxonJoydeep · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“EO applied in the concentration range of 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 μl against Amaranthus viridis, Echinochloa crus-galli L. and Phalaris minor drastically affected the germination of all test plants and inhibited root and shoot development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Callistemon oil impaired germination and root and shoot development of Echinochloa crus-galli L..

Taxon
Echinochloa crus-galli L.Echinochloa crus-gallie0
Treatment
EO applied in the concentration range of 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 μle0
Outcome
germination of all test plants and inhibited root and shoot developmente0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Echinochloa crus-galli
Echinochloa crus-galli · TaxonMichael Becker · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“EO applied in the concentration range of 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 μl against Amaranthus viridis, Echinochloa crus-galli L. and Phalaris minor drastically affected the germination of all test plants and inhibited root and shoot development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Callistemon oil impaired germination and root and shoot development of Phalaris minor.

Taxon
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0
Treatment
EO applied in the concentration range of 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 μle0
Outcome
germination of all test plants and inhibited root and shoot developmente0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“EO applied in the concentration range of 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 μl against Amaranthus viridis, Echinochloa crus-galli L. and Phalaris minor drastically affected the germination of all test plants and inhibited root and shoot development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling chlorophyll content declined after oil exposure.

Taxon
Amaranthus viridisAmaranthus viridist0
Treatment
Callistemon viminalis Essential Oilt0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus viridis
Amaranthus viridis · TaxonJoydeep · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Not only seedling growth, even the chlorophyll content also reduced appreciably.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“Callistemon viminalis Essential Oil against Echinochloa crus-galli L., Amaranthus viridis and Phalaris minor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–132 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil negatively affected photosynthesis.

Taxon
Callistemon viminalisCallistemon viminalise0
Treatment
Callistemon viminalis EOe0
Outcome
photosynthetic processe0
Qualifier
negatively affectinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Callistemon viminalis
Callistemon viminalis · TaxonPëter 1968 User:Peter Greenwell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Callistemon viminalis EO was negatively affecting the photosynthetic process.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–828 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidant enzyme activities were upregulated and interpreted as protection from oil stress.

Taxon
Amaranthus viridisAmaranthus viridist0
Treatment
Callistemon viminalis EO induced stresse0
Outcome
antioxidant enzymes activitiese0
Direction
Upregulatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus viridis
Amaranthus viridis · TaxonJoydeep · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Upregulation of antioxidant enzymes activities indicated that these enzymes were providing protection against Callistemon viminalis EO induced stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Amaranthus viridis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amaranthus viridis was more sensitive than the other two species.

Taxon
Amaranthus viridisAmaranthus viridise0
Outcome
sensitivee0
Direction
more sensitivee0
Comparator
Echinochloa crus-galli L. and Phalaris minore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus viridis
Amaranthus viridis · TaxonJoydeep · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amaranthus viridis was reported to be more sensitive in comparison to Echinochloa crus-galli L. and Phalaris minor.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1095 · show in text ↑

botanical · physiology: pigments · Amaranthus viridis (slender amaranth)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · growth · Amaranthus viridis (slender amaranth)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

botanical · growth · Phalaris minor (littleseed canarygrass)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

botanical · growth · Echinochloa crus-galli (barnyard grass)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 45 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.